Good! He’ll only be 26 too! Good age!!Oh good, hopefully he can keep us in the PL seven years ago.
Huzzah!!!
Good! He’ll only be 26 too! Good age!!Oh good, hopefully he can keep us in the PL seven years ago.
Didn’t I read something from the City hierarchy earlier in the season suggesting increased commercial activity would cover wages. While Acun plus sales would provide transfer kitty? I have no idea if that is anywhere near plausible, but it was said.
Can the pretend accountants not worry about the finances.
I’m pretty sure proper accountants are employed by the new owners to make sure the profit and loss sheets balance. They don’t need the amateurs on here for assistance
Can the pretend accountants not worry about the finances.
I’m pretty sure proper accountants are employed by the new owners to make sure the profit and loss sheets balance. They don’t need the amateurs on here for assistance
I suppose a relationship with juve would massively help as the feeder club doesn't usually pay any wages of the loanees. Free players basically.
Well not necessarily, those details are usually kept private but I can't imagine we've paid a million pounds to get somebody to sign for us. We'll have paid something, but more likely there'll be generous promotion bonuses rather than flat out million pound payments.
Our wage budget last season was amongst the lowest. Wilks was our highest paid player if you're to believe some tenuous transfer sources and nobody was on more than £10k a week.
The KLP money was used for the bulk of the transfer costs, but it won't be the sole source of it. The club still generates income through sponsorships and other means too.
Can the pretend accountants not worry about the finances.
I’m pretty sure proper accountants are employed by the new owners to make sure the profit and loss sheets balance. They don’t need the amateurs on here for assistance
We haven't paid any 7 figure signing on fees
It'll be interesting to see the balance sheet when accounts are published. But a top 10 playing budget is 25m + and most contracts are 3 years. Without a huge increase in matchday/merch/sponsorship income it's not going to cover it overnight.
We could easily spend 13m a year over income with the transfer policy we are seeing, hence the FFP concern.
Sounds like a load of bollox to me.
Signings / spending weren't even dependent on selling KLP.; he could have still been here.
Sounds like a load of bollox to me.
Signings / spending weren't even dependent on selling KLP.; he could have still been here.
If someone has the money to 0ay back a loan but is stopped from doing so until the sale I presume completed, don't you still have the money to pay off the loan and therefore not need to raise fresh funds to do so?
I don't think his sale was ever in doubt.
Yes, but then you need money to buy players, ones good enough to get you to the top end of the Championship.
Nkaweme would be such an absurd step up. Anyone talking about age is chatting rubbish, if we have him for two years it would be HUGE.
Not a target I'd expect from a club which has to sell to buy.