Transfer Rumours Summer '22 Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Mckechnie Orange said:
Latest I can glean from translated tweets is that he met with the owner last night.
Click to expand...

I think something people need to be aware of is that despite his age (which will no doubt raise a few eyebrows), the bloke is an incredible athlete and he gets up and down the pitch no bother. He'd work great as a number 10 too.

He'd be a really positive signing for us and his experience would go a long way to helping the younger lads out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phinius T Bookbinder, Nikica Jellyfish, CANADATIGER and 7 others
Just doing some maths about our transfers, how many of our new signings do you reckon are on north of £20k p/w (or £1m a year roughly speaking)?
 
Steven Toast said:
Just doing some maths about our transfers, how many of our new signings do you reckon are on north of £20k p/w (or £1m a year roughly speaking?).
Click to expand...

Seri, Estupinan and Tufan 100% will be.
I saw rumours from Turkey that Sinik will be on 25k but I can't see that. Figueredo, Tetteh and Sayadmanesh I think will be slightly less but still high teens
 
HullCityInEurope said:
Seri, Estupinan and Tufan 100% will be.
I saw rumours from Turkey that Sinik will be on 25k but I can't see that. Figueredo, Tetteh and Sayadmanesh I think will be slightly less but still high teens
Click to expand...

So if we've made £16m from KLP and another half a mil say on Honeyman, would that cover all those transfers and wages do you think?
 
Steven Toast said:
So if we've made £16m from KLP and another half a mil say on Honeyman, would that cover all those transfers and wages do you think?
Click to expand...

We've paid out roughly 10m in fees depending on who you believe. I imagine the wages are more than 6.5 for all the new signings, but then I suppose you need to subtract the wages of players sold/released.

I reckon transfer fees and net wages for new signings alone are still more than what we've had in.
 
HullCityInEurope said:
We've paid out roughly 10m in fees depending on who you believe. I imagine the wages are more than 6.5 for all the new signings, but then I suppose you need to subtract the wages of players sold/released.

I reckon transfer fees and net wages for new signings alone are still more than what we've had in.
Click to expand...

Interesting. So it checks out about KLP paying for our spending then. I heard something from a former City player (through a family member) about our new owners, trying to work out if it's true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howdentiger2
.
Steven Toast said:
So if we've made £16m from KLP and another half a mil say on Honeyman, would that cover all those transfers and wages do you think?
Click to expand...

The fact they've been in discussions over the FFP cap suggests they're putting in about 39m.of their own cash over and above above fees received.

And you can see how if theyve increased the wage bill by 20m.a year.

No need for the meeting with the FA if they weren't planning on getting close to the limit.
 
HullCityInEurope said:
Negative news then I take it?
Click to expand...

Baz figures suggest we've spent about 12m in fees already. KLP doesn't cover half a dozen players 7 figure wage contracts over 3 years also now does it? Match day income won't cover it either.

The only way you can trouble FFP is by spending 39 million above income in a 3 year period.

Why the meeting with the FA if we were spending net zero?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WestStandTiger
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back