We will never compete for the league title, we may win the odd cup now and again, but if we want to attract overseas fans to our club - success in the trophy room is not going to happen. We have to attract overseas fans which may gravitate to Stoke, Norwich, West Bromwich Albion, Crystal Palace.
I know I will be getting more annoying than a certain other poster on here has been in the past with his man love for a certain player, but when the name change topic first game up I stated (as Papa has done in his interview) that other clubs will change their names. We are now competing on the level where it is not just the UK interested in games in our division but the world - and big clubs like Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester United (formerly Newton Heath) are recognised for their success, which is what the anti-name changers say is the only way to increase our support by - by winning things, (Sorry if the grammar on that is wrong) so on that basis are we going to have anyone claiming that Wigan (also a location known for Rugby League) has had an increase in fans due to the FA Cup win (a trophy outweighs relegation in my opinion).
We will never compete for the league title, we may win the odd cup now and again, but if we want to attract overseas fans to our club - success in the trophy room is not going to happen. We have to attract overseas fans which may gravitate to Stoke, Norwich, West Bromwich Albion, Crystal Palace.
, has said he supports and likes the change, the rest are don't cares and they are ****ers if they claim to be supporters. They won't like me saying that, but guess what, I don't ****ing care, they are beyond contempt.Omg Fez, altering the facts to suit yourself eh? I have publically stated on this thread that I support and welcome the change. So your figures are wrong, there's 100% more support for the change than you're claiming.
Twice as much.
Fact.
My apologies for that, as it takes you out of the ****** class, but puts you quite firmly into the seriously mid-guided.
I have seen the reasons why the name change is necessary and they are total bull****.

As the vast majority of fans are pro-Allam, but anti-name change, there is no war between City fans.
In fact, is there anyone who is pro-Hull Tigers?
Anyone who doesnt think Mr Allam hasnt looked into the viability of the name change before doing it is a ****ing mong cum guzzling **** bucket and should **** the **** off the ****ing ****ers and lets face it the biggest moaning ****s dont even live in Hull.
TWT
The good 'Doctor' Allam is shaping up to be a blathering fool:
http://worldsoccertalk.com/2013/09/...me-to-manchester-hunter-daily-soccer-report/?

Anyone who doesnt think Mr Allam hasnt looked into the viability of the name change before doing it is a ****ing mong cum guzzling **** bucket and should **** the **** off the ****ing ****ers and lets face it the biggest moaning ****s dont even live in Hull.
TWT
Anyone who doesnt think Mr Allam hasnt looked into the viability of the name change before doing it is a ****ing mong cum guzzling **** bucket and should **** the **** off the ****ing ****ers and lets face it the biggest moaning ****s dont even live in Hull.
TWT
Daft ****.
If Assem Allam had researched the viability the full name change would have happened. It's all about spin.
Anyone who doesnt think Mr Allam hasnt looked into the viability of the name change before doing it is a ****ing mong cum guzzling **** bucket and should **** the **** off the ****ing ****ers and lets face it the biggest moaning ****s dont even live in Hull.
TWT
Even his MD and son think it's a ****ing ridiculous idea