City transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
MadridTiger said:
To be honest I just don't want Gray here. I think he is over rated and after this purple patch in his career will just end up an average championship striker. At the moment we don't need him. If something happens before deadline day then maybe we should do something, but I'd rather invest that money in centre mid.
Click to expand...

You mean like that Scot who can play a central midfield role? The one we're bringing in on Monday?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steve.R
Leeds Met HCAFC Supporter said:
Think it's a risk. £9million is steep - but Harry Kane was a "mediocre Championship striker" a few years back, and look at him now.
Click to expand...
All a big risk. Saying ' just pay it' is a joke. We had a budget for the lad, they want a ridiculous quantity and we've not acted like a bunch of kids and thrown the money at something which could come back and haunt us, especially now we are in division 2, with the current squad we don't need a striker.
 
MadridTiger said:
All a big risk. Saying ' just pay it' is a joke. We had a budget for the lad, they want a ridiculous quantity and we've not acted like a bunch of kids and thrown the money at something which could kick us in face, which we simply do not need to do with the team we have.
Click to expand...

The 'ridiculous quantity' they want is 500k more than we're offering. It's not like they want 5m more..
 
MadridTiger said:
All a big risk. Saying ' just pay it' is a joke. We had a budget for the lad, they want a ridiculous quantity and we've not acted like a bunch of kids and thrown the money at something which could kick us in face, which we simply do not need to do with the team we have.
Click to expand...
So you are relaxed about risking not getting a striker in and then losing most of our strikers?
 
Happy to be corrected if I am wrong Madrid, but I note you have mentioned the term 'bad boy' and something similar in a previous post. Is this really about the money for you, or have you taken a dislike to him for some other reason? If we lose our strikers we are unlikely to get in any quality before the deadline, so your argument doesn't quite stack up to my mind. Not having a go just curious!
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
SydneyTiger14 said:
The 'ridiculous quantity' they want is 500k more than we're offering. It's not like they want 5m more..
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter, you can't just buckle at everything. If I was buying into an investment with risk attached I wouldn't just say 'oh go on then' it's Allan's cash maybe he doesn't just want to throw another half a million at someone
 
MadridTiger said:
Doesn't matter, you can't just buckle at everything. If I was buying into an investment with risk attached I wouldn't just say 'oh go on then' it's Allan's cash maybe he doesn't just want to throw another half a million at someone
Click to expand...

Who is Allan? You mean MacError?
 
Sir Cheshire Ben said:
You are a proper idiot.

All this **** was sparked by you.

You're a boring ****.

Your post stats are deteriorating with each post.

For somebody who's allegedly made over 10,000 posts on message boards I would have thought you'd be able to use & understand the simple reply function.

Did I mention, you're a boring ****?

It's "apologise".
Click to expand...
Not with a U.S. spel chequer. Now apologize.
 
Lincoln Tiger said:
Happy to be corrected if I am wrong Madrid, but I note you have mentioned the term 'bad boy' and something similar in a previous post. Is this really about the money for you, or have you taken a dislike to him for some other reason? If we lose our strikers we are unlikely to get in any quality before the deadline, so your argument doesn't quite stack up to my mind. Not having a go just curious!
Click to expand...

Seems a bit of a pollock and not worth 9m. That's it
 
MadridTiger said:
Doesn't matter, you can't just buckle at everything. If I was buying into an investment with risk attached I wouldn't just say 'oh go on then' it's Allan's cash maybe he doesn't just want to throw another half a million at someone
Click to expand...
Maybe he doesn't but that doesn't make it right.
It depends on judgement about what a difference it makes to going up and what we can gain by doing it over not doing it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back