Yeah, seems to be some confusion from the reporters.
So to clear it up for them, someone can take over the club without owning it 100%. What they mean is Donald and co. Look like they are staying with less of a stake in the club.
Do takeovers not go this way quite a bit, the new owners take what they can get to control the club and then slowly buy more and more, when it's available?
I seem to remember a bad tempered share struggle at Arsenal.
As long as Donald has no real influence he can have his shares imo.
If a new owner gets us moving Donald will be irrelevant.
Last edited: