WYP Breakthrough

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
A completely empty away end would have been the perfect response to the situation imposed on us.

A sparse gathering means everyone thought 'not great support from Hull today'.

People attending the game were selfish, and if they thought their support enabled us to win, how does the support of 6,000 at Barnsley result in an abject 2-0 defeat?

The accusations of people going to the game being selfish is frankly ridiculous. If people went then that was there choice, but they still used the opportunity to protest against the decision both pre match and during the game. I doubt anyone was happy with the restrictions, but there was still a game to be played and 3 points to be won that day. It's impossible to ignore that fact and the people who went to the game did so to support their team as well as protest against WYP. To accuse people of still wanting to support our team in difficult circumstances selfish is stupid.
 
I wonder how far Jawaid would go keep Ged happy? ... Just downtown? Or all the way up Brokeback Mountain?
 
The accusations of people going to the game being selfish is frankly ridiculous. If people went then that was there choice, but they still used the opportunity to protest against the decision both pre match and during the game. I doubt anyone was happy with the restrictions, but there was still a game to be played and 3 points to be won that day. It's impossible to ignore that fact and the people who went to the game did so to support their team as well as protest against WYP. To accuse people of still wanting to support our team in difficult circumstances selfish is stupid.

What you have written is illogical.

Protesting in a march at Huddersfield is one thing, going to the game is a completely separate action and event.

By scuttling humbly into the ground under the watchful smirking gaze of the WYP, you rubberstamped their actions.

By rubberstamping their actions, they got away with their lies and unjustified actions.

If they get away with it, they then set a precedent, and it becomes acceptable (unless challenged in law).

Thankfully a concerted legal and civil campaign to use procedures is fighting this battle (too late for us and that game), but a line has been drawn in the sand and now the wider world in this country knows the nature of the struggle.

A load of submissive flaskers going through all the hoops the WYP set for them was counter productive for the medium and long term spectating good of Hull City fans.

That's why they were misguided and selfish.
 
That's why they were misguided and selfish

Who the **** are you! City Agro Police!

The whole point is that we "Hull City Supporters" had the right of choice. You are as bad as WYP but you can't see it can you.
 
What you have written is illogical.

Protesting in a march at Huddersfield is one thing, going to the game is a completely separate action and event.

By scuttling humbly into the ground under the watchful smirking gaze of the WYP, you rubberstamped their actions.

By rubberstamping their actions, they got away with their lies and unjustified actions.

If they get away with it, they then set a precedent, and it becomes acceptable (unless challenged in law).

Thankfully a concerted legal and civil campaign to use procedures is fighting this battle (too late for us and that game), but a line has been drawn in the sand and now the wider world in this country knows the nature of the struggle.

A load of submissive flaskers going through all the hoops the WYP set for them was counter productive for the medium and long term spectating good of Hull City fans.

That's why they were misguided and selfish.

I understand what you're saying but you miss the point that some people still wanted to support their team regardless of the circumstances. I am aware they are two separate events, but the protest itself carried on into the game. I'm guessing you missed the banner in protest in the away end? I know people who went who were pissed off with the restrictions but they knew amongst all the **** that was going on there was still a game to be played. The exemplary behaviour by City fans in attendance also managed to make WYP's decision look even more foolish and inaccurate in their 'concerns' over the game. If people did or didn't go to the game then that is their choice, but it is unfair to chastise them for it.
 
I understand what you're saying but you miss the point that some people still wanted to support their team regardless of the circumstances. I am aware they are two separate events, but the protest itself carried on into the game. I'm guessing you missed the banner in protest in the away end? I know people who went who were pissed off with the restrictions but they knew amongst all the **** that was going on there was still a game to be played. The exemplary behaviour by City fans in attendance also managed to make WYP's decision look even more foolish and inaccurate in their 'concerns' over the game. If people did or didn't go to the game then that is their choice, but it is unfair to chastise them for it.

Yeah, he'd nipped to the loo because he couldn't wait for the adverts at half time and didn't realise you can pause the game. Or of course, he might have been busy protesting online.
 
There are probably 500 or so who use this method to travel to games anyway. I don't, but understand for them than nothing changed for this game
 
Not #mufc realted, but I just got hold of emails from and to West Yorks Police setting out how they placed draconian measures on Hull fans..

...before a match earlier this year. They wanted to save £44k expenditure so made the decision 2 months before the game with no negotiation.

WYP circulated a document called 'Hull threat' which seemingly makes out Hull fans to be trouble. Hull reps provided evidence that was lies.

This is abysmal stuff. One copper telling another 'not to negotiate (the issue) but simply explain (the police's position'.

And when Hull's reps defended themselves, WYP spent a lot of time trawling through records specifically to contradict Hull.

And then the officers pat each other onthe back for forcing Huddersfield into a corner, with one officer emailing a "well played" to another

It's get better: A week after WYP imposed the measures, they express surprise - almost shock - that the media wants hold them to account.

The resulting statement is not true: The decision was not taken as a result of negotion. WYP made it and said there would be no compromise.

Then on February 18, WYP acknowledged there has been "widespread resentment" of their decision.

IA WYP press officer recommending a senior officer snub the BBC's interview request in revenge for a BBC reporter "ambushing" him.

The senior officer should do the interview with Calendar television instead, the press officer recommends.

WYP seem consistently surprised by how articulate and educated fans seem in written correspondence. They seem to be on the back foot a lot.

On Jan 17, cost of policing HTFC v HCFC with no resrictions was £44k. By Feb 19 it was £30k. Statistical hopscotch, WYP style.

Generally, the tone of WYP officers towards HTFC staff seems overly aggressive and not very friendly at all.

There's an extremely patronising line from a WYP officer who spins the line that WY residents were being asked to pay extra police bill....

..while "the club (HTFC) & the FA will make more money". He implies HTFC had a say, when they were forced into a corner by Sky, FA and WYP.

his report opens a massive can of worms: Disabled fans were exempt from restrictions, presumably as there was no evidence they would....

cause trouble. So what proves you DO pose a danger? A criminal record? So, shouldn't all fans without CRs be free to make own way to game?

Interestingly, throughout this document, there is absolutely no evidence of "intelligence" that HCFC fans would cause trouble at this game.

On Feb 19, a HTFC wrote to WYP: "We've come under increasing pressure from our supporters, HCFC fans and the press" about the restrictions.

The HTFC official makes it clear that, if they hadn't've allowed the 17:20 kick off, HTFC could have been docked points by the FA.

So HTFC were due to put out a very strongly worded statement, but then toned it down after speaking with WYP.

In fact, Supt Ged McManus expressed his "extreme disappointment" at the tone of the proposed HTFC press release.

It seems HTFC didn't realise the strength of reaction there would be. I don't blame them - they had no choice but to cooperate with WYP.

On February 20, a collection of press cuttings on the controversy was circulated among officers, who approved of a favourable editorial.

At the time, fans' groups dismissed the editorial in question as overly critical of law-abiding fans made out to be thugs.

WYP temporary dep ch con Jawaid Akhtar said: "Yorkshire Post editorial is balanced & highlights the problems where it belongs i.e. the fans"

Among the emails is a superb letter addressed to Hull Daily Mail which says: "You wouldn't want a team from WYP to compete on Mastermind."

An officer based at Kirklees Police Station monitored forums, youTube, Twitter to monitor fans' reaction to the fan restrictions and...

...compiled a dossier for senior officers. This was a request from Supt Ged McManus whose colleague said: "Can you please view youTube and..

"..and other sites in relation to the behaviour of HCFC fans at matches, there are clips of their activity at recent games. Can you please..

"...establish the date, teams involved and press reporting of the event." A deadline for this 'research' is given.

So basically, WYP were so short of 'intelligence' about HCFC fans, they had to watch youTube to gather it.

You have to wonder what was goinng through Supt McManus's mind as Feb went on. He seems to be panicking by massive biteback by fans.

One officer compiled a list of 308 Facebook comments about WYP and the match. Bear in mind you can't copu and paste Facebook comments, how..

..much time did s/he spend on this? Let's not forget, this is primarily an issue of the cost of policing.

In the Facebook document, you can clearly see named individuals. How did WYP use the information about them?

On Feb 22, WYP's press office compiled an 'if asked' statement. This is what authorities do when they don't want to proactively inform the..

...media about something, but are obliged to tell them if asked. The statement concedes ground, indicating they were ready to compromise.

I know you said Rick has emailed all the nationals but I would have thought sending it to David Conn at the Guardian would be the ideal. He's about the only investigative journalist there is nowadays.
 
I understand what you're saying but you miss the point that some people still wanted to support their team regardless of the circumstances. I am aware they are two separate events, but the protest itself carried on into the game. I'm guessing you missed the banner in protest in the away end? I know people who went who were pissed off with the restrictions but they knew amongst all the **** that was going on there was still a game to be played. The exemplary behaviour by City fans in attendance also managed to make WYP's decision look even more foolish and inaccurate in their 'concerns' over the game. If people did or didn't go to the game then that is their choice, but it is unfair to chastise them for it.

Disagree as previously stated.

The WYP like everyone else know that that the law abiding majority will behave. Nowt was learned by them there- they were not therefore proved wrong.


Sometimes it's not what was individuals want, it's what's best in the common interest. In other words to highlight the unacceptable restirctions, a total boycott was the best solution.

If someone's proud personal attendance record was dented, tough- there were bigger issues at stake which affected all future attendances.
 
Disagree as previously stated.

The WYP like everyone else know that that the law abiding majority will behave. Nowt was learned by them there- they were not therefore proved wrong.


Sometimes it's not what was individuals want, it's what's best in the common interest. In other words to highlight the unacceptable restirctions, a total boycott was the best solution.

If someone's proud personal attendance record was dented, tough- there were bigger issues at stake which affected all future attendances.


But that's only in your view and you're pissing in the wind. The vast majority of Hull City supporters watched on SKY. This view of yours is totally based on your own need for glory. ****ing glory hunting plastic anarchist ****.
 
I would have loved to have seen a completely empty away stand without a single person in it, that would have got the message out especially as it was being broadcast by Sky!
However if you travel on city coaches every week to away games then I can see why you would want to go see the lads play in such an important game at that time of the season so I will not criticize them
Personally I think its sickening to think a Yorkshireman cannot go anywhere in Yorkshire whenever the hell he wants to by whatever means of transport he choses to use without being subject to laws that basically presume you are guilty until being proven innocent.
If I had been home I would have gone to Huddersfield and walked round the town in my city shirt and watch the game in a pub.
Nobody is going to tell me where I can and can't go and what I can and can't wear and on what days I can do it especially in Yorkshire FFS!
 
I read it all and decided that I would march around my living room in protest whilst watching a DVD of the match called Huddesfiled vs Hully Slity.
 
So were is this now going? Back to pro and against fans going to the game (which has be done and past) Surely the best best way to move forward from this is to e-mail those that are concerned (MP's WYP journalist) and let it take the right cause.

As Mods and friends were pro Boycott (big turn out by the way<applause>) I see this thread doing just what the last thread did!, Maybe you should keep it on current topic rather then a old rehash of the Pro and against fans going to the game.
 
Always gives me the stinkers the next day does Robby's, but you're right damn fine tipple, It is in-fact tonight's beer of choice, four bottles of Old Tom. Wonderful.

.

Geordie Pal's up tonite so it's Mordue radgie gadgie and Wylam Locomotion No1. Very nice indeed especially the Wylam.