I found Schad to be an interesting and informative poster. IF we have lost him it's not at all difficult to think why.
Schad's a great poster.
I found Schad to be an interesting and informative poster. IF we have lost him it's not at all difficult to think why.
Nail on head "fran"Some fall off must be due to results....even I post less when we lose. It's noticeable that a few people have reappeared because we've had a decent result. However, the greatest reduction must be due to posters not being able to accept different opinions....and then take it personally. I would just say chill out....saying that you've finished an argument, but then having another dig does not count.
Nail on head "fran"
Also, as a relative 'newbie' there seems to be mainly the Class of 2011 posting on here. And, yes, gettng slagged off for having a different view has, I suspect, an effect on whether to continue taking part in the forum or finding another outlet.

Nail on head "fran"
Also, as a relative 'newbie' there seems to be mainly the Class of 2011 posting on here. And, yes, gettng slagged off for having a different view has, I suspect, an effect on whether to continue taking part in the forum or finding another outlet.
Not sure what you mean by that. You’ll find a great number of the posters here are of ‘vintage’ years.
There’s a difference as well in being ‘slagged off’ for having a different view, and being challenged on that view, or being asked to justify it. That’s discussion, and is what makes a forum tick round. There’s also being called out when a view feels hypocritical or essentially makes no sense.
Some fall off must be due to results....even I post less when we lose. It's noticeable that a few people have reappeared because we've had a decent result. However, the greatest reduction must be due to posters not being able to accept different opinions....and then take it personally. I would just say chill out....saying that you've finished an argument, but then having another dig does not count.
I actually think that's hugely improved over the past year or so tbh, as both sides were guilty of it in the past. Much better discussion on here now rather than the previous positive/negative ****e we used to get.

Some fall off must be due to results....even I post less when we lose. It's noticeable that a few people have reappeared because we've had a decent result. However, the greatest reduction must be due to posters not being able to accept different opinions....and then take it personally. I would just say chill out....saying that you've finished an argument, but then having another dig does not count.
I actually think that's hugely improved over the past year or so tbh, as both sides were guilty of it in the past. Much better discussion on here now rather than the previous positive/negative ****e we used to get.
That’s because we all unanimously agree that we are useless this season![]()

I have always found the "happy clappers vs bed-wetters" debates entertaining
![]()
Only just realised that Stoke actually have some winnable games.
When you say “some”, they only have 2 left!Only just realised that Stoke actually have some winnable games.
Of course, but it’s also possible that we beat Everton and Swansea, Palace beat Stoke, Bournemouth also beat Swansea, Huddersfield lose all their last 3, and then the Swansea v Stoke match is irrelevant to us, as, indeed is how we get on against City.We lose to Everton, Swansea beat Bournemouth and Stoke beat Palace is the nightmare, yet pretty possible, scenario isn't it?
Of course, but it’s also possible that we beat Everton and Swansea, Palace beat Stoke, Bournemouth also beat Swansea, Huddersfield lose all their last 3, and then the Swansea v Stoke match is irrelevant to us, as, indeed is how we get on against City.
Only just realised that Stoke actually have some winnable games.