Whether you are right or wrong, that's by the by, you cannot spout your opinion as fact whilst slipping the word "probably" in there.
It kind of defeats the object of what you're trying to say
Transfer Rumours Summer '22 Transfer Thread
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Whether you are right or wrong, that's by the by, you cannot spout your opinion as fact whilst slipping the word "probably" in there.
It kind of defeats the object of what you're trying to say
Just telling us what we want to hear. Classic media mogul tactic. Clusterfuck.
Agreed, I was just pointing out that Chelsea wouldn't have to offer him £300k a week to get him to stay, he'd stay whatever they offered him.
Who’s Preston, and how come he was the first to know?
Any fact that doesn’t conclude with FACT is not a fact. FACT.
Are you Allam’s secret love child?
I just feel it will be more his choice if he is not getting game time. He's a good keeper and deserves to be playing regularly, he may be happy to fight for his place, but maybe not.
Don't take the piss out of Preston; he doesn't respond well.
You must log in or register to see media
Thought the attacking player (no10) was a permanent deal? Unless this is in addition to... Which seems a bit overkill
So you're suggesting we've agreed terms in principle but that he'd go elsewhere?
Can you provide an example of this ever happening where a club had an option to buy, triggered it, and then didn't sign the player?
Of course it's up to Baxter ffs. As I've said repeatedly "IF THE HE WANTS TO COME". I don't know how many more ways I have to emphasise that.
You've literally just asked for an example where a club has agreed a fee, agreed terms in principle yet the player goes elsewhere. It's not uncommon
We agreed terms with Twine yet he went elsewhere, same with Muriqi by the sounds and I'm sure plenty more this summer.
I think if we can get Lo-Tutala across the line we don’t need an attacking player, better to focus on a right back and a combative midfielder IMO.
Nothing I said there was my opinion.
I think we'll sign Baxter permanently but it's not a guarantee and while the option makes it easier, it's not a certainty.
If he has a really good season, I think Chelsea will seriously consider about making him their no.2
Didn’t realise Twine and Muriqi were on loan here last season? Must be why they didn’t sign as they never got to play?
Why does that matter? The deal is the same. We've agreed a fee for Baxter 12 months in advance. That should make him more likely to stay as he likes it here but if Chelsea want him or a PL club offers to make him their no.1, he won't be staying.
It's the same issue we've literally had with Allahyar, he played well on loan and got a better financial offer elsewhere. If he wanted to take it, he wouldn't have stayed. And that's with Acun best mates with the Fenerbahce owner.
The discussion is around making a loan transfer with an option to buy permanent. Read the conversation leading up to it for context.