Transfer Rumours Summer '22 Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
“ none of the first team have played together “ meaning none of our first choice players have played together

Which ever way you try to spin it, it's just wrong.... I'm sure Ingram and coyle have played together haven't they? I'm also sure Baxter and Greaves have played together.... Shall I go on?

Are you still going to insist none of our first choice players have played together?
 
Which ever way you try to spin it, it's just wrong.... I'm sure Ingram and coyle have played together haven't they? I'm also sure Baxter and Greaves have played together.... Shall I go on?

Are you still going to insist none of our first choice players have played together?
You’re still not getting what I mean, our first team, as in our first 11, the first 11 on the team sheet. Not players from our first team squad.
 
You’re still not getting what I mean, our first team, as in our first 11, the first 11 on the team sheet. Not players from our first team squad.

So are those players that I just mentioned not going to be in our starting 11? ( Obviously only 1 of Ingram/ Baxter will hence why I mentioned both )
 
I think you’re just being intentionally ignorant to try win internet points, you know exactly what I meant.

tbh I don’t…. Are you saying “all” of the starting 11 haven’t played together - maybe. Still more changes to follow

But to say “none” of the starting 11 haven’t played together is just wrong. 10 of the 11 might have played together. We have no way of knowing what team will be played next Sat.

Either way it’s a weird statement to make
 
Nothing here to gain points, but what your posting and then saying you mean are completely different things.....
Well I apologise if it wasn’t clear but what I mean is the 11 that we are planning to play with throughout the season haven’t actually played together as a team before.
 
tbh I don’t…. Are you saying “all” of the starting 11 haven’t played together - maybe. Still more changes to follow

But to say “none” of the starting 11 haven’t played together is just wrong. 10 of the 11 might have played together. We have no way of knowing what team will be played next Sat.

Either way it’s a weird statement to make
It's a bit confusing as he's just suggested they might have after categorically stating they haven't. Do I win any internet points?

What can I buy with these points?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howdentiger2
tbh I don’t…. Are you saying “all” of the starting 11 haven’t played together - maybe. Still more changes to follow

But to say “none” of the starting 11 haven’t played together is just wrong. 10 of the 11 might have played together. We have no way of knowing what team will be played next Sat.

Either way it’s a weird statement to make

None of them have played together as a team before? I don’t think it’s difficult to understand :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
  • Like
Reactions: SW3 Chelsea Tiger
It's a bit confusing as he's just suggested they might have after categorically stating they haven't. Do I win any internet points?

What can I buy with these points?
Do you really think the starting 11 yesterday is the starting 11 we’re hoping to win promotion with? :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
I think you’re just being intentionally ignorant to try win internet points, you know exactly what I meant.
There’s internet points ????? Why has no one told me…for **** sake I could be top of the world Ma
Extra internet point if you can name the film and who said it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tigerboy98