Which ever way you try to spin it, it's just wrong.... I'm sure Ingram and coyle have played together haven't they? I'm also sure Baxter and Greaves have played together.... Shall I go on? Are you still going to insist none of our first choice players have played together?
You’re still not getting what I mean, our first team, as in our first 11, the first 11 on the team sheet. Not players from our first team squad.
So are those players that I just mentioned not going to be in our starting 11? ( Obviously only 1 of Ingram/ Baxter will hence why I mentioned both )
I think you’re just being intentionally ignorant to try win internet points, you know exactly what I meant.
Nothing here to gain points, but what your posting and then saying you mean are completely different things.....
tbh I don’t…. Are you saying “all” of the starting 11 haven’t played together - maybe. Still more changes to follow But to say “none” of the starting 11 haven’t played together is just wrong. 10 of the 11 might have played together. We have no way of knowing what team will be played next Sat. Either way it’s a weird statement to make
Well I apologise if it wasn’t clear but what I mean is the 11 that we are planning to play with throughout the season haven’t actually played together as a team before.
It's a bit confusing as he's just suggested they might have after categorically stating they haven't. Do I win any internet points? What can I buy with these points?
There’s internet points ????? Why has no one told me…for **** sake I could be top of the world Ma Extra internet point if you can name the film and who said it
Well no because 8 is not 11, until the 11 have played together as an 11 then none of them have played as an 11
No (at least I hope not) but I didn't state that it definitely wasn't. That was you At least I think. It's getting a little confusing
