??
I have no idea what this is responding to. For a third time, we had moved on and were discussing current players and the wage structure. I wasn't talking about Honeyman.
You replied to a post about Honeyman.
I'll leave you to your ocd.
??
I have no idea what this is responding to. For a third time, we had moved on and were discussing current players and the wage structure. I wasn't talking about Honeyman.
You replied to a post about Honeyman.
I'll leave you to your ocd.
****ing hell man, re-read the conversation. Shark and I were talking about the wage structure of current players and you piped up with something about Honeyman and what we offered him, nothing to do with what you were quoting.It's amazing, if I say something that someone challenges me on where it came from that's fine, but if I do the same I'm 'being like this'. MO regularly claims to have information others don't have and initially when Honeyman was leaving, claiming
he didn't like the fact he wouldn't be guaranteed game time.
That didn't answer the question about being respected, it basically refers to the fact that he was being told he wasn't going to be first choice over the signings, who have a better quality over him, thus would be picked ahead of him. If anything it shows him having lack of respect for the club and the recruitment of the club, because he felt that he wasn't 'wanted', which obviously wasn't the case otherwise they'd have just released him and not offered an imporoved contract. So, please show me a quote where he stated he 'didn't feel respected'. I've come to the conclusion that you make a lot of stuff up in the majority of your posts, that you haven't repeated from other posters and you're like a dog with a bone and just won't let it go when challenged and dig in even further and make yourself look a bit stupid. Are you the one with the podcast in Austrailia? If so **** knows what the Aussies think of our club with the **** you come out with.“They did offer me a longer-term contract – the same length as Millwall – but it wasn’t how I felt I was viewed at the club,” said Honeyman. “They could’ve given me a better deal and they were refusing to."
There you go.![]()
That didn't answer the question about being respected, it basically refers to the fact that he was being told he wasn't going to be first choice over the signings, who have a better quality over him, thus would be picked ahead of him. If anything it shows him having lack of respect for the club and the recruitment of the club, because he felt that he wasn't 'wanted', which obviously wasn't the case otherwise they'd have just released him and not offered an imporoved contract. So, please show me a quote where he stated he 'didn't feel respected'. I've come to the conclusion that you make a lot of stuff up in the majority of your posts, that you haven't repeated from other posters and you're like a dog with a bone and just won't let it go when challenged and dig in even further and make yourself look a bit stupid. Are you the one with the podcast in Austrailia? If so **** knows what the Aussies think of our club with the **** you come out with.
Ahem….You mean… have a good day sport.I don't know where to start with this so I guess I won't. You talk yourself in circles to discredit Honeyman then suggest I make **** up. Have a good day pal.
“They did offer me a longer-term contract – the same length as Millwall – but it wasn’t how I felt I was viewed at the club,” said Honeyman. “They could’ve given me a better deal and they were refusing to."
There you go.![]()
I think if Slater carries on, he'll have a new contract on the table within 6 months and I think the gap will naturally close a bit. As a base of him and Seri, it's a really nice combo, it's just a shame they're both vertically challenged.
You must log in or register to see media
Good interview, those who wondered if Shota has a say have had that addressed in it too
He's got a year + option, I wouldn't say it's if he doesn't sign a deal he's being sold..."Remain hopeful" is a strange turn of phrase, sounds like there's some risk of him leaving?
Not sure other than money why he wouldn’t sign, he’s not the finished article, he’s still got a mistake in him. He isn’t walking into any pl side yet, he’d be better staying with us for another year or two.He's got a year + option, I wouldn't say it's if he doesn't sign a deal he's being sold...
Not sure other than money why he wouldn’t sign, he’s not the finished article, he’s still got a mistake in him. He isn’t walking into any pl side yet, he’d be better staying with us for another year or two.
Football people around him no doubt helpsAll I can say for Greaves is he seems a bit more level-headed about his future than KLP and more likely to commit to a long-term deal now than jump ship if a PL offer came in.