Disagree.
Many can and do argue it was the correct decision from a footballing standpoint! Including me. I was bored and frustrated to death most of the time. It's then a different matter as to whether Walter is the right replacement; only TWT.
And I don't think Acun "bought into a narrative that a lot of home fans shared". He said from the very off, the moment he bought us, what type of football he wanted us to play; no, not setting the tactics, but simply spelling out that he wanted the football to be exciting, to get fans off their seats, etc etc. Rosenior promised that, but it never materialised. After quickly sorting out the defence and establishing his style, he clearly said that the summer pre-season and that transfer window would see him address the attacking side of things and we would have pace, power, excitement, etc. Imo, it just didn't happen. He seemed clueless in terms of coaching effective attacking play and we continued to pass endlessly around the back, retained possession above all else, turned attack into defence in a flash, etc.
Not meaning to re-open the Rosenior debate for the hundreth time, but couldn't let a statement go that it made no sense from a footballing sense. To me it made a lot of sense as Rosenior's football was boring and he seemed poor in terms of coaching attack. And that Acun somehow bought into a narrative.