The main argument I don’t quite get is the idea that the fans should be shouting from the rooftops about things we aren’t happy with, yet at the same time can be blameless if things fall through. I’ve been scorned before for “just hoping” it works out okay and KLD takes over with a majority, when apparently all fans should be making it known it’s not acceptable and staying quiet didn’t help us 2 years ago etc.
But then if the club come out and say it’s the fans fault, those same people saying we should shout loud think it’s laughable that the fans could be blamed.
I just don’t tally that up. Either we accept the fans have no influence or we accept that they do. And if we do have an influence, we have to be ready to expect it can be a negative one as well as a positive one.
If this takeover does fall through (and to be clear there’s no current feeling it will), and the club do say the fans influenced it, then I think it’s fair enough to take some (not all) of that on the chin. We do have a group of fans actively demanding that this takeover didn’t happen in the guise it was (with KLD not having a majority). If the takeover doesn’t happen, they got what they asked for, even if they were asking for it for legitimate reasons.