S.A.F.C. - the future

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
sheepman said:
You're taking every opportunity to try and down play and denigrate the takeover
even questioning whether it is a takeover or not when even using your own figure by any financial definition it is not questionable
You're trying to make out its not a good thing for the club as nothing will change

Until we see the shareholding and listen to their plans we don't know but on the percentage being speculated
I'd rather go with a glass half full that we have new wealth owners who want the best for the club and our old regime has been swept aside.
Click to expand...

I agree we should wait and see what happens. But there’s nothing wrong with asking questions when we’ve been lied to for the last two years. My agenda is the same as yours. We both want success for the club.

Neither of us know what this change in shareholding will bring. I just believe we should go into it with our eyes open this time after having the piss taken out of us last time. The fact that lot are still around is unpalatable to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sheepman
sheepman said:
You're taking every opportunity to try and down play and denigrate the takeover
even questioning whether it is a takeover or not when even using your own figure by any financial definition it is not questionable
You're trying to make out its not a good thing for the club as nothing will change

Until we see the shareholding and listen to their plans we don't know but on the percentage being speculated
I'd rather go with a glass half full that we have new wealth owners who want the best for the club and our old regime has been swept aside.
Click to expand...

The takeover is supposedly nigh on done and one of our most loyal servants in cooke has been sacked off, but no, donald has no influence eh.
So we dont need a kit man do we not. So our new billionaire owner who is about to 'take over' the club cannot afford to run with a kit man. It fookin stinks.
I said months ago there is no takeover, and as soon as this **** is all confirmed i will reveal who told me there wasnt, and believe me, it is someone who does know what is going on in the club.
 
Plug in boots said:
This is all complete rubbish. I am of far superior intelligence to everyone on here. I will talk down to you all, attack you for no reason and make up information so i can pretend to be ITK. The best bit is, my little crew will love me for it and fawn over me
Click to expand...
Alreet NOM, remember when you did the whole name and profile pic thing to Roger, he had a special chat with you and you ended up following him around the board like a puppy?
 
Mad Dog said:
Almost sick in my mouth that I’m delighted we are still above the mighty Accrington Stanley tonight.
Click to expand...
I still find it hard to believe we are competing with teams like Accrington Stanley. As a young kid in the early 1960's I remember being intrigued by what I thought was an unusual name for a team. I live in a part of Australia (between Adelaide and Melbourne) where football, what most Aussies would call "soccer" was, and is still, almost non existent. The only reason I knew of the them was because my father would listen to the radio, record the scores of all four divisions and create his own league tables. I think AS would have been near the bottom of the old fourth division at that time. I just hope the fortunes of SAFC take a turn for the better soon, and that I am still around to enjoy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Random lad, Mad Dog, Evil Jimmy Krankie and 9 others
Simonside le bon said:
The takeover is supposedly nigh on done and one of our most loyal servants in cooke has been sacked off, but no, donald has no influence eh.
So we dont need a kit man do we not. So our new billionaire owner who is about to 'take over' the club cannot afford to run with a kit man. It fookin stinks.
I said months ago there is no takeover, and as soon as this **** is all confirmed i will reveal who told me there wasnt, and believe me, it is someone who does know what is going on in the club.
Click to expand...

You're talking about Bob mate, no need to be coy.

You seem totally certain there's no takeover, would you care to put money on it?
 
Simonside le bon said:
The takeover is supposedly nigh on done and one of our most loyal servants in cooke has been sacked off, but no, donald has no influence eh.
So we dont need a kit man do we not. So our new billionaire owner who is about to 'take over' the club cannot afford to run with a kit man. It fookin stinks.
I said months ago there is no takeover, and as soon as this **** is all confirmed i will reveal who told me there wasnt, and believe me, it is someone who does know what is going on in the club.
Click to expand...
Sacking of Cooke is dreadful don't think anyone would disagree

We'll know soon enough if you're "no takeover" theory is correct.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back