S.A.F.C. - the future

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Thats not really what’s happened though. You’re demanding I provide you with information that I don’t particularly want to give out. I’ve probably said more than I should anyway.
With respect, you said not much other than making unsubstantiated claims about a contentious issue regarding the influence of Charlie Methven. Feel free to continue to do so but expect to be held to account for it.
 
With respect, you said not much other than making unsubstantiated claims about a contentious issue regarding the influence of Charlie Methven. Feel free to continue to do so but expect to be held to account for it.

To be fair most claims on message boards are unsubstantiated, whether it’s something people want to believe or want to disbelieve depending on preference.
 
To be fair most claims on message boards are unsubstantiated, whether it’s something people want to believe or want to disbelieve depending on preference.

There's a difference though, between random posters and people setting themselves up as 'a voice' while claiming to have inside information and 'contacts'.

Surely you feel that you have a responsibility to be accurate and back up your claims.
 
I wouldn’t proper concentrate on the betting odds on sky bet, because what some sly people do who are trusted tell people the wrong name so the bet on that name, so the real name who the actual betting makes the odds better, a lot like horse racing
So if I really, really, really wanted a bet, who would I stick my pocket-money on ;) ?
 
With respect, you said not much other than making unsubstantiated claims about a contentious issue regarding the influence of Charlie Methven. Feel free to continue to do so but expect to be held to account for it.

In all honesty I've still no idea what this is all about. I'm aware of the existence of WMS but have no idea what they do. When I saw a flurry of posts I ignored it at first but it's continued.

The lad from there seems indignant about something but I'm not sure what. I've no idea what he's saying about Methven and what he's agitated about.

Can you give me an idea?
 
There's a difference though, between random posters and people setting themselves up as 'a voice' while claiming to have inside information and 'contacts'.

Surely you feel that you have a responsibility to be accurate and back up your claims.

I don’t see myself as a voice though? If you think I’m a liar then fair enough. I’m not sure what benefit there would be in making stuff like that up.

Let’s hope what I and others have said on this is complete bollocks and Methven is nowhere to be seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viva la revolution
To be fair most claims on message boards are unsubstantiated, whether it’s something people want to believe or want to disbelieve depending on preference.

We can agree to disagree about the definition of 'claims' and 'postings', it's immaterial really. However, you posted "...the point is he (Methven) still influences things even though he’s resigned....." . It's only natural that people will want to know a) what it is he influences and b) by how much he influences them, given his low reputation amongst the support. As a member/contributor of WMS you can't be naive enough to think that that post/claim would remain unchallenged. As to his attendance at homes games - I couldn't give a flying one, he won't dare show his face when the club have paying customers in attendance once again.

FWIW, my opinion is that his influence extends no further than PR and anything in relation to the actual day-to-day running of the club was by dint of his association with SD back when they were bosom-buddies so they agreed on most things in order to flip the club and make a few quid. SD being the majority shareholder made CMs 'agreement' to anything moot as SD didn't need his backing anyway. CMs 'influence' has always been, and will always be of a very minor variety given his shareholding. All imo of course.
 
I see a few people on the other side having a few digs at me again I held my hands up I said I got the names wrong,

but On the 18th of October I messaged @Wheatsheaf this


‘I haven’t got a clue at the minute mate, all I keep getting now about FPP is the have to be involved,

but what I’ve been
Told is
New shares In

Donald and CM to keep share
Sartori and new people to have majority

new people have a lot of money’
 
Last edited: