Ratings v Everton

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Dr Van Helsing said:
I'll try again

You said he only wanted Phillips on loan because.. that is an assumption... there could be a multitude of reasons Howe wanted him in anyway shape or form.


You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...
I’ll try again, it’s a fact that we had no money in January so we quite simply couldn’t buy him hence we only wanted him on loan. Is that really so hard to understand? It’s also a fact that we had a lot of midfield injuries hence the connection with midfield players. It’s not speculation it’s fact
 
magpie290761 said:
I’ll try again, it’s a fact that we had no money in January so we quite simply couldn’t buy him hence we only wanted him on loan. Is that really so hard to understand? It’s also a fact that we had a lot of midfield injuries hence the connection with midfield players. It’s not speculation it’s fact
Click to expand...

That doesn't change the fact there's a plethora of other potential reasons and you said 'he only wanted him on loan'

The fact is he might have wanted him permanently.

BTW I've added this to help assist you with your accusation.

You must log in or register to see images
 
All I'd put back into this is - who decided to give Lascelles, Ritchie and Dummett new one year deals when we have 9 more players than City do and they're on for a double treble?

I'm guessing that wasn't Ashworth.
 
Roland Deschain said:
All I'd put back into this is - who decided to give Lascelles, Ritchie and Dummett new one year deals when we have 9 more players than City do and they're on for a double treble?

I'm guessing that wasn't Ashworth.
Click to expand...

Is Ritchie and Dummett confirmed or rumoured?
 
Dr Van Helsing said:
That doesn't change the fact there's a plethora of other potential reasons and you said 'he only wanted him on loan'

The fact is he might have wanted him permanently.

BTW I've added this to help assist you with your accusation.

You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...
There may be any number of reasons but it’s still a fact that because of the financial situation we simply couldn’t do anything else but only get him on loan.
He may have wanted him permanently but to say that would be speculation which is what you did.
Dr Van Helsing said:
Is that a fact a guess or an assumption @magpie290761
Click to expand...
it’s clearly a guess
 
Dr Van Helsing said:
That doesn't change the fact there's a plethora of other potential reasons and you said 'he only wanted him on loan'

The fact is he might have wanted him permanently.

BTW I've added this to help assist you with your accusation.

You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...
Might is speculation I said we wanted him only on loan because it’s a fact we couldn’t do anything else but. Where is that speculation? I stand by your statement that Howe would have bought him in January if we had the money said by you was speculation Points 1 and 3?
 
magpie290761 said:
Might is speculation I said we wanted him only on loan because it’s a fact we couldn’t do anything else but. Where is that speculation? I stand by your statement that Howe would have bought him in January if we had the money said by you was speculation Points 1 and 3?
Click to expand...


You've admitted there are more potential reason Howe would want Phillips..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back