My understanding was it was a loan with an obligation to buy but could be wrong.
Where did I admit I was wrong? Making stuff up nowHe seems reduced to unpleasantries after admitting he was wrong.
So it’s an assumptionMy understanding was it was a loan with an obligation to buy but could be wrong.
Conceded nothing pal he wanted him on loan and could only do it on loan because of the money. Absolutely nowhere have I speculated what he wanted beyond that. You really are strange. You were the one speculating saying he would have bought him in January if we had the money.The thing is we don't have the information required to claim Howe only wanted him for one reason. There's likely many.
He's conceded that now.
Conceded nothing pal he wanted him on loan and could only do it on loan because of the money. Absolutely nowhere have I speculated what he wanted beyond that. You really are strange. You were the one speculating saying he would have bought him in January if we had the money.
Points 1 and 3? Or yielding?
Don’t we all know it.He can string out nonsense forever when he’s wrong

I understand we pulled out as Howe was concerned about Phillips lack of playing time. Only a rumour but I understand it was Howe who pulled the deal.My understanding was it was a loan with an obligation to buy but could be wrong.
So why consider him in the first place?I understand we pulled out as Howe was concerned about Phillips lack of playing time. Only a rumour but I understand it was Howe who pulled the deal.
Don't get started on "I understand" and "rumours" Trev, or we'll get another 15 pages of posts.I understand we pulled out as Howe was concerned about Phillips lack of playing time. Only a rumour but I understand it was Howe who pulled the deal.
I was already in this discussion before that so didn’t strangely start up then. No idea what you are referring to in that post.I refer you to the post I made at 9.40am which is why you strangley started up... take a good read.
I was already in this discussion before that so didn’t strangely start up then. No idea what you are referring to in that post.
We couldn’t sign anyone outright in January Fact.
I stated as shown by you we only wanted him on loan which in January was a fact. Anything else is speculation something you are accusing me of somehow despite what I was saying being fact.
You said Howe would have bought him in January if we had the money- speculation.
Are you getting it yet?
Points 1 and 3? Yeild?
Don't get started on "I understand" and "rumours" Trev, or we'll get another 15 pages of posts.
I pointed out my issues in the immediate replyThat was my post you replied to this Morning....take a read and let me know if you have any issues after.
Sorry that’s points 2 and 3I was already in this discussion before that so didn’t strangely start up then. No idea what you are referring to in that post.
We couldn’t sign anyone outright in January Fact.
I stated as shown by you we only wanted him on loan which in January was a fact. Anything else is speculation something you are accusing me of somehow despite what I was saying being fact.
You said Howe would have bought him in January if we had the money- speculation.
Are you getting it yet?
Points 1 and 3? Yeild?
Saying it to you obviously but keep delaying Yeild?Why are you talking with yourself now
Saying it to you obviously but keep delaying Yeild?