I have understood both but your replies show you don’t
It's your replies that show me you don't and bow the fact you think it's mine don't on both areas.
I have understood both but your replies show you don’t
HHe’s not a left back
hes always played both including many times at LBHe’s not a left back
So prove it instead of skipping around with cryptic reliesIt's your replies that show me you don't and bow the fact you think it's mine don't on both areas.
Yes I know he’s played there. But he’s absolutely awful there.H
hes always played both including many times at LB
So prove it instead of skipping around with cryptic relies
Anything else irrelevant to my post you want to add?Yeah but you obviously know its true
Avoiding backing yourself up again?Just read the posts surely ?
What do you want me to do assign hercule Poirot to the case ?
Anything else irrelevant to my post you want to add?
![]()
And if Howe had thrown on an inexperienced player and they had made the same blunder against an eternal diver like Young he would have got the same criticism for not using an experienced player in a critical stage of the game.Yes I know he’s played there. But he’s absolutely awful there.
He’s a good 4th choice centre back.
Avoiding backing yourself up again?
Mental gymnastics avoiding backing up your point againI don't need to mate just refer back.... I wouldn't care I made a perfectly balanced post trying to explain things without being partisan.
Mental gymnastics avoiding backing up your point again
More nonsense. Still avoiding eh?I'm afraid at this point there's no hope... you're now in another galaxy.
More nonsense. Still avoiding eh?
There’s nothing to understand, you fail to present anythingIt's nonsense to you because you don't understand so thanks for confirming.
There’s nothing to understand, you fail to present anything
It’s never been presented just waffle but if you don’t understand that’s okIt was presented you just misunderstood.