Off the field operations

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
This is what the T&C's actually say:

Season Ticket holders must have their ticket used, (either through attendance or from a ticket being used following ticket transfer / forwarding) for at least 70% of fixtures to be entitled to future loyalty pricing and risk having their Season Ticket cancelled if persistently not attending games..

Basically, if you miss 14 games in a season you will not qualify for the loyalty prices the following season. Not great but a far cry from what people are posting on here.

Where did you study maths. It's 7 games a season.
 
Probably the same place you studied English <ok>
You are right though, I stupidly counted all games instead of just home games. It still isn't what you were saying though

Yes it is. If you do not attend 70% of home games (miss 7) you are at risk of having your season ticket revoked/cancelled. It's literally in your quote.
 
I know you are hard of thinking but take this opportunity to read it again

Read it loads. The only information we can go off is the 70%, loyalty point and ticket revoked.

Are you saying this is not the case. Seems the the vast majority on here and social media have also made a mistake reading the words.....
 
This is the type of decision I would expect that whopper to make. Bruce has been class with hummel but this stinks of Americanisation and trying to max out profit. Needs to sort this **** out.
Having had the pleasure to speak to Bruce and found him a genuine bloke and fan, I will be very disappointed if he is the instigator of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blond Bombshell
This feels like a T&C they've put in place to give them the ability to stop people taking the piss, rather than punish people who genuinely can't get to games. Would be shocked if it doesn't get treated on a case by case basis, so to use @Prehab26's example he'd have the opportunity to explain the problem before anything gets revoked, at which point they'd drop it.

It makes zero sense for them to want to rescind season tickets to genuine fans during a time we don't come close to selling out.
 
Having had the pleasure to speak to Bruce and found him a genuine bloke and fan, I will be very disappointed if he is the instigator of this.

I have spoke to him a bit too and know the other part of his family. Nice bloke. But this is not good.
 
This feels like a T&C they've put in place to give them the ability to stop people taking the piss, rather than punish people who genuinely can't get to games. Would be shocked if it doesn't get treated on a case by case basis, so to use @Prehab26's example he'd have the opportunity to explain the problem before anything gets revoked, at which point they'd drop it.

It makes zero sense for them to want to rescind season tickets to genuine fans during a time we don't come close to selling out.

How can they ensure fairness and equality in applying the terms then? They wouldn't be able too. It's a really poor decision and totally not necessary to have in.
 
I have spoke to him a bit too and know the other part of his family. Nice bloke. But this is not good.

Think its just a T&C which is there to allow them to revoke when its necessary, rather than a new "rule".

Much in the same way all hotel stays have a T&C saying they reserve the right to evict mid-stay. It's there if its needed, not as the norm
 
This feels like a T&C they've put in place to give them the ability to stop people taking the piss, rather than punish people who genuinely can't get to games. Would be shocked if it doesn't get treated on a case by case basis, so to use @Prehab26's example he'd have the opportunity to explain the problem before anything gets revoked, at which point they'd drop it.

It makes zero sense for them to want to rescind season tickets to genuine fans during a time we don't come close to selling out.

It doesn't. But that's what their own words have said. Unless you're implying it's an empty threat, which is also, equally pathetic and damaging PR
 
Read it loads. The only information we can go off is the 70%, loyalty point and ticket revoked.

Are you saying this is not the case. Seems the the vast majority on here and social media have also made a mistake reading the words.....
I have posted what the T&C's say, if you can't understand the wording then so be it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blond Bombshell
It doesn't. But that's what their own words have said. Unless you're implying it's an empty threat, which is also, equally pathetic and damaging PR

All terms and conditions are empty threats then.

Next time you go to a pub are you gonna shout at the barman "are you threatening to kick me out?" just because it says on the wall they reserve the right not to serve customers?
 
By investigating each case when they come up rather than blanketly applying it.

There is no way they have the resource or will to do that mate. See how silly it sounds already ?

Investigate things because someone missed a few night games. .

They should be begging fans and kids too go. Not used threats and terms like this that at best , is open to negative interpretation.