Here we go again...

Again, the original application had not failed, the court decided that the decision had to be set asside (void). Due to the length of the process and the fact the original application was for season 2014-15, the owners were invited to re-apply.

The point about this is that Assem Allam said if his application failed he would not make a second application. As it stands his application has not failed and because of the FA Rules he must now re-apply. But as far as what he said is concerned, this is not a second application following a failed first application because the first application did not fail it was set aside.

The Court <laugh> ^

Judge Judy has spoken.
 
Again, the original application had not failed, the court decided that the decision had to be set asside (void). Due to the length of the process and the fact the original application was for season 2014-15, the owners were invited to re-apply.

The point about this is that Assem Allam said if his application failed he would not make a second application. As it stands his application has not failed and because of the FA Rules he must now re-apply. But as far as what he said is concerned, this is not a second application following a failed first application because the first application did not fail it was set aside.

Assem Allam said "no further application". The panel said a further application was required and Assem Allam has now made a further application. How making a further application ties in with his statement "no further application" I don't know.

I see you now agree that the first application failed because most of the season has gone and the panel said the FA didn't have to consider it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spesupersydera
You didn't read the ruling at all.

I have read the ruling a number of times. There seems to be a number of people who cannot get to grip with the fact that the decision on last years Name Change application was declared void by a tribunal. I am trying to get Obidiah to clearly state what that decision was, by asking him a direct question, which he seems to be reluctant to answer.

Here for everyone to see, is the courts final decision.

You must log in or register to see images


That application was for season 2014-15 and the councils decision was declared void. The court stated that it would be unfair due to the length of the process for that application to be resubmitted and that the Club were free to re-apply. In other words there was no decision and it was too late to re-enter the same application. Effectively, Assem Allams letter of intent to apply for season 2015-16 is not a second application it is a repeat of the first application but for a new season. HE HAS NOT GONE BACK ON HIS WORD.
 
On the one hand it's nice to see the antis true faces again. You wonder why the more moderate visitors to this site don't post.

On the other hand, with the massive amount of business and marketing skills quite obviously shared among you, I don't understand why you've not got a consortium together to buy the club.

Why haven't you?

Noone believes your bollocks about not wanting him out. Any of you.

You clearly believe you could run the club better and more profitably, plus engage with all of the fans as well as increase our fan Base.

Why not prove it?

Must be some local businessmen or rich retired sportsmen who love the club, or just a chance to make money with your undoubted expertise.

Bit more effort than just gobbing off online, but honestly let's see something meaningful from all you keyboard warriors.
 
It's probably just a stunt to boost season pass sales.
 
I have read the ruling a number of times. There seems to be a number of people who cannot get to grip with the fact that the decision on last years Name Change application was declared void by a tribunal. I am trying to get Obidiah to clearly state what that decision was, by asking him a direct question, which he seems to be reluctant to answer.

Here for everyone to see, is the courts final decision.

You must log in or register to see images


That application was for season 2014-15 and the councils decision was declared void. The court stated that it would be unfair due to the length of the process for that application to be resubmitted and that the Club were free to re-apply. In other words there was no decision and it was too late to re-enter the same application. Effectively, Assem Allams letter of intent to apply for season 2015-16 is not a second application it is a repeat of the first application but for a new season. HE HAS NOT GONE BACK ON HIS WORD.

Paragraph 95: "The club is free to make a new application, and it must be satisfied with the substantive relief we have granted." According to the panel a new application is required, no ifs, no buts, no maybes. Assem Allam there will be "no further application". You right he didn't say there woouln't be a "new" application.
 
Assem Allam said "no further application". The panel said a further application was required and Assem Allam has now made a further application. How making a further application ties in with his statement "no further application" I don't know.

I see you now agree that the first application failed because most of the season has gone and the panel said the FA didn't have to consider it.

I haven't said that at all. I said the first application hasn't failed. I said the court declared it void.

Assem Allam said he would not make a second application to change the name. Implicit in that statement is that the first application fails.......in other words "I will not make a second application if the first fails". The first DID NOT FAIL was declared void by the tribunal court.
 
He's now trying to bring about the end of Hull City, he has been for 2 years, he's lied and cheated constantly throughout that time and you and your dad are defending it. You're Assem Allam fans, not City fans.

PLT, the spotty faced student and self proclaimed adjudicator of who can or cannot be a Hull City fan!!!! Fcuking moron.
 
On the one hand it's nice to see the antis true faces again. You wonder why the more moderate visitors to this site don't post.

On the other hand, with the massive amount of business and marketing skills quite obviously shared among you, I don't understand why you've not got a consortium together to buy the club.

Why haven't you?

Noone believes your bollocks about not wanting him out. Any of you.

You clearly believe you could run the club better and more profitably, plus engage with all of the fans as well as increase our fan Base.

Why not prove it?

Must be some local businessmen or rich retired sportsmen who love the club, or just a chance to make money with your undoubted expertise.

Bit more effort than just gobbing off online, but honestly let's see something meaningful from all you keyboard warriors.

Is this another presumed assertion or have you carried out a poll which confirms this this theory? The silent majority, perhaps?
 
I haven't said that at all. I said the first application hasn't failed. I said the court declared it void.

Assem Allam said he would not make a second application to change the name. Implicit in that statement is that the first application fails.......in other words "I will not make a second application if the first fails". The first DID NOT FAIL was declared void by the tribunal court.

The court, as you call the panel, declared the decision void not the application. The court said a new application was required to change the name (paragraph 95). A new application means it will be the second application. Something Assem Allam said wouldn't happen when the words "no further applications" came out of his mouth.