That's the one. The same one who's also a lying petulant **** who cannot be trusted to keep his word.
Here we go again...
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
That's the one. The same one who's also a lying petulant **** who cannot be trusted to keep his word.
No he's not, he's trying to give this City the best quality of football he can. Seen as though when we were **** hardly anyone in Hull was interested and generations pissed off to support Man United and Liverpool.
By making the club an established Premier League club he is going to try and stop that happening with more generations in Hull.
Strov's losing his ****.
Let's hope he goes on a long, non-posting sulk for a while again.
Let's hope he goes on a long, non-posting sulk for a while again.
What was the result of of last years application to change the name of Hull City?? (this is like pulling teeth)
Strov, you've probably got yourself a COTM nomination for your contribution to this thread alone.
You've been proven wrong, you've lied, you've been proven wrong again, you resort to name calling & insults.
You're Assem Allam & I claim my 5er.
Hull City confirm name change proposal to the FA
HULL City have written to the Football Association to confirm they will again bid to change the club’s name to Hull Tigers ahead of the 2015-16 campaign.
Any club wishing to alter its playing name in time for next season had to lodge an application by today and City have this morning sent a letter declaring their intentions to the FA’s headquarters at Wembley.
The latest development comes as no surprise after City challenged the FA Council’s original decision to reject an application to become Hull Tigers last April.
An arbitration tribunal eventually ruled that verdict could no longer stand due to a perceived bias in the original process, leaving the door open for City to resurrect their controversial plans for the 2015-16 campaign.
It remains unclear if City will table their original application or submit fresh paperwork, but the decision will again hinge on the vote of the FA Council after consideration from the FA’s Membership Committee. The FA Council rejected a change to Hull Tigers by 47 to 27 votes last April.
http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull...tory-26267129-detail/story.html#ixzz3W3TGf3ZL
HULL City have written to the Football Association to confirm they will again bid to change the club’s name to Hull Tigers ahead of the 2015-16 campaign.
Any club wishing to alter its playing name in time for next season had to lodge an application by today and City have this morning sent a letter declaring their intentions to the FA’s headquarters at Wembley.
The latest development comes as no surprise after City challenged the FA Council’s original decision to reject an application to become Hull Tigers last April.
An arbitration tribunal eventually ruled that verdict could no longer stand due to a perceived bias in the original process, leaving the door open for City to resurrect their controversial plans for the 2015-16 campaign.
It remains unclear if City will table their original application or submit fresh paperwork, but the decision will again hinge on the vote of the FA Council after consideration from the FA’s Membership Committee. The FA Council rejected a change to Hull Tigers by 47 to 27 votes last April.
http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Hull...tory-26267129-detail/story.html#ixzz3W3TGf3ZL
If they don't post a defence to his viewpoint then they are clearly in favour of it. Cuh.
As for "my dad" I haven't a ****ing clue what you're on about.
You don't know who your dad is?
Hardly a surprise.
As for "my dad" I haven't a ****ing clue what you're on about.
I don't swear enough to be your Dad!!!
It was denied, it was later set aside on a technicality, not to be reconsidered. Although the panel suggested that the club were free to submit a new application.
Of course our owner won't be doing that as he stated publicly that he will only submit one application & has also stated, more than once, that he never goes back on his word.
My god I wish I was as witty as you, have you thought about stand up? Your talent is wasted on Not606 moaning about the Allams.
Oh he knows who his Dad is alright. Why don't you offer to meet him sometime?
It was set aside and now ceases to exist. As a result he needs to submit a new, second, further application to change the name. All very simple and in laid out in paragraph 95 of the judgment.
The man said "no further applications" and has now made one.
Actually, I get the feeling he would be up for that. Not quite sure if OLM would though.
There's your key mistake....
................ OR.................... you could stop lining his pokets by paying to go watch his team