I've no idea what you're on about here.I think the rules on offsetting losses changed a couple of years back, so that figure is effectively not going to matter now, particularly as we are, by the owner's description, debt free.
I've no idea what you're on about here.I think the rules on offsetting losses changed a couple of years back, so that figure is effectively not going to matter now, particularly as we are, by the owner's description, debt free.
I think the rules on offsetting losses changed a couple of years back, so that figure is effectively not going to matter now, particularly as we are, by the owner's description, debt free.
As long as he pays it back, I'm happy. My concern is that he has said he won't be doing that before July next year, and actually, he foresees a £5m profit this year as something to offset next seasons £5m loss if we're still in league one.
Essentially, shows no intention of paying back any of his debt in the near future.
Don’t think he does either m8, so don’t sweat itI've no idea what you're on about here.
I'm pretty sure that, now the investment has been agreed, the new investors would have identified and dealt with any creative accounting by the owners.
What is your opinion on it now @Kittenmittons do you think they would have put the money back in?
Surely the yanks would have went over everything with a tooth comb so can't see them letting the owners to take money out and not put it back,
Game, set and match HM. It seems that KM’s credibility is blown by his misunderstanding of some fairly straightforward financial transactionsIt doesn't matter what you spend the income on. It's just sets the limit on how much you can spend on players. Otherwise, you could keep loaning money out and receiving it back again to artificially boost income for SCMP!
No, it's not in there because it doesn't count as income.
Night!
This 100%Game, set and match HM. It seems that KM’s credibility is blown by his misunderstanding of some fairly straightforward financial transactions
Thank **** for that, finally we agree, my view is nobody should care we’ll be fine, it’s their business to run the club which they own how they see fit, and as long as it’s not illegal it’s not our concern, we’re merely customers. If we don’t like it we can go elsewhere and be customers there.I don't care about it now. I think we'll be fine (assuming there's oversightbwhich I can't imagine won't be the case).
In the end, all I wanted was for Donald to put his money where his mouth is. If he's done that, it's good and I have no qualms in saying that we are better off for it.
I'm pretty sure that, now the investment has been agreed, the new investors would have identified and dealt with any creative accounting by the owners.
If the Americans thought there was any credence in the alleged skullduggery they wouldn't now be involved.
For all the rampant speculation, and sly accusations, there's been absolutely nothing to put off the investment of multi millions.
I've no doubt the amateur accountants will continue with their 'smoking gun' announcements but I suspect most people are totally bored with it by now.
Well, we don't actually know any of this to be true yet in fairness. Getting investment doesn't mean any of this was untrue, or not meaningful. It was obviously more relevant without them.
Amazing how many people here are willing to suck the dick of an owner and describe themselves as a customer, or give them carte blanche to act how they want.
I've said before, but this is great news for the club, but if you think this invalidated what I said, you're ironically putting 2 and 2 together and getting 56.
Smug, why did the majority share become a loan? Do you know yet?
I would suggest that if it was a LOAN rather than a long term investment it would not have taken the time it has , nobody knows the full terms of the investment which I think will be a phased takeover dependent on the level of progress which will be in what I think will be a complex contract/agreement which will account for the time for the deal to come to fruition. Just pleased it is all settled now let’s get back to football .Well, we don't actually know any of this to be true yet in fairness. Getting investment doesn't mean any of this was untrue, or not meaningful. It was obviously more relevant without them.
Amazing how many people here are willing to suck the dick of an owner and describe themselves as a customer, or give them carte blanche to act how they want.
I've said before, but this is great news for the club, but if you think this invalidated what I said, you're ironically putting 2 and 2 together and getting 56.
Smug, why did the majority share become a loan? Do you know yet?
"Amazing how many people here are willing to suck the dick of an owner or give them carte blanche to act how they want."
How many?
I haven't see one person say anything like that, you seem to be inventing a whole raft of people to argue with.
And the owners of any club have carte blanch to act as they want and there's nothing you can do about that, as the Mags have been proving for a decade. You may convince yourself you're taking a brave stance and making a difference but posting on a chat forum is totally irrelevant to what happens at the club.
People like Roppa, but again, I completely disagree with the idea that because he 'bought' the club, that he doesn't have a responsibility to us fans on any level. It may be a business to you, but for most people, it is more than that.
Anyway, I actually agree with the last poster, it's hopefully irrelevant now.