ctwd now out in the open
- Thread starter Chazz Rheinhold
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Aye, calling one of our players a "******" or a "****" is exactly the same as chanting the name of our club.
Go to bed, arsewipe.
Boo all you like
It wont effect the name change .
Those in favour of the name change should have stuck up for AA along time ago by sending pro name change support to the FA before they said NO
Only they didn't.
To late now the fa wont change their mind
It wont effect the name change .
Those in favour of the name change should have stuck up for AA along time ago by sending pro name change support to the FA before they said NO
Only they didn't.
To late now the fa wont change their mind
no i didn't.
you're going to say and believe whatever suits you, regardless of the truth. you don't listen and you don't hear.
i'm not in ctwd.
apparently they want to keep the allams. despite their repeated statements that they want to keep the allams, ctwd are being called liars.
i'm not in ctwd.
do i want to keep the allams? some days yes, some days no.
strovolos made a stupid assertion that if someone does something for which you should be grateful, you should be grateful forever, no matter what else that person does.
i gave him an extreme example in which you wouldn't be grateful forever. it offended your sensitivities.
can't win 'em all.
strovolos also claimed, amongst a whole load of other rambling drivel, that if anyone didn't share allam's vision in its entirety, they were anti-allam. patent nonsense, but when someone won't listen, the examples get turned up a few notches. in all probability they still don't listen. i tried.
as for the superfan crap, i didn't say a word about me being any kind of superfan. i never claimed to be. i gave up on away games when they ended in defeat in case i was a jinx. i almost never sang. all i said was that i cared and it hurt to lose and it's not like that for everyone. my assertion what that there are fans and there are customers and i attempted to differentiate between them. someone like you would spin that into something else, of course.
really, though, "posting things about child rape"? really? did i post things about child rape? what things, other than to say it was an example of something bad? isn't that true? what else did i say?
Before the name change application, fans sang City till I Die
During the name change application, fans sang City till I Die
After the name change application was rejected, fans sang City I Die
Only during the name change application would it be right to construe the singing of City till I Die as a form of protest, against the owner's intention to change the historic name of Hull City. Even then, it was at the same time a pretty civilised form of protest which also doubled as a song supporting the team. Certainly a long way from coffins, sit in protests and fish heads.
I am as frustrated as the booers the other night that this name change seemingly won't go away, despite the games governing body ruling against it. I would love to concentrate on supporting the team on the pitch and enjoying watch some of the best players ever to pull on a Hull City shirt.
The booers and anti-ctwd die lot, in my view, are focusing on the wrong target however. Assem Allam is the one who has resurrected the name change issue, not ctwd.
In my view, the booers are just picking on the easy target because, deep down, they are also afraid of the long term future of the club; not because many of them believe that Hull Tigers will actually transform our finances and allow us to set our sights on the top 5, but because they are afraid Allam will throw his dummy out over the issue and leave us with an uncertain future.
As to the chant: it is a chant ffs. It isn't 'offensive', it doesn't have any derogatory comments about the owners in it, contains no swear words, nothing. Even Ehab acknowledges this. The 'worst' you could say about it is that it marks and celebrates our history as Hull City, particularly being sung at a time that also marks the founding of the club. Given this, I am surprised that any true Hull City fan should get so wound up by it.
During the name change application, fans sang City till I Die
After the name change application was rejected, fans sang City I Die
Only during the name change application would it be right to construe the singing of City till I Die as a form of protest, against the owner's intention to change the historic name of Hull City. Even then, it was at the same time a pretty civilised form of protest which also doubled as a song supporting the team. Certainly a long way from coffins, sit in protests and fish heads.
I am as frustrated as the booers the other night that this name change seemingly won't go away, despite the games governing body ruling against it. I would love to concentrate on supporting the team on the pitch and enjoying watch some of the best players ever to pull on a Hull City shirt.
The booers and anti-ctwd die lot, in my view, are focusing on the wrong target however. Assem Allam is the one who has resurrected the name change issue, not ctwd.
In my view, the booers are just picking on the easy target because, deep down, they are also afraid of the long term future of the club; not because many of them believe that Hull Tigers will actually transform our finances and allow us to set our sights on the top 5, but because they are afraid Allam will throw his dummy out over the issue and leave us with an uncertain future.
As to the chant: it is a chant ffs. It isn't 'offensive', it doesn't have any derogatory comments about the owners in it, contains no swear words, nothing. Even Ehab acknowledges this. The 'worst' you could say about it is that it marks and celebrates our history as Hull City, particularly being sung at a time that also marks the founding of the club. Given this, I am surprised that any true Hull City fan should get so wound up by it.
This thread is just going round in circles.
CTWD is not an anti-Allam organisation and no joke on a gift bought for a committee member is going to change that, though I realise that some on will persist in claiming it does. Unfortunately, for those people, if it wasn't this, it would be something else, some are hell bent on blaming CTWD for everything and it's just something we're going to have to live with.
The FA have rejected a name change and are not going to reverse it, CTWD had hoped(but not expected) that would be the end of it, but unfortunately it continues. The sooner the FA reiterates it's position and puts this completely to bed, the sooner we can go back to just talking about on-field matters and that day can't come soon enough for me.
CTWD is not an anti-Allam organisation and no joke on a gift bought for a committee member is going to change that, though I realise that some on will persist in claiming it does. Unfortunately, for those people, if it wasn't this, it would be something else, some are hell bent on blaming CTWD for everything and it's just something we're going to have to live with.
The FA have rejected a name change and are not going to reverse it, CTWD had hoped(but not expected) that would be the end of it, but unfortunately it continues. The sooner the FA reiterates it's position and puts this completely to bed, the sooner we can go back to just talking about on-field matters and that day can't come soon enough for me.
Exactly!
In addition, as some have said already, if anyone is to blame for creating the division of fans its Assem Allam and his potty press conference.
Firstly, have you got any actual proof of that? Secondly, can you be sure it's the CTWD lobby repsonsible, or the ****e "fans" who boo 'em?
then how could any political party ever work? it's a compromise, a cooperation, apparently for the greater good. you don't think that goes on in politics at every level? it's how democracy works.
I've decided that the name change should be tried ... not because I prefer "Hull Tigers", or just "Tigers" but because I want Hull "whatever" to cease being dependent on owners who invariably turn out to be shysters. I'd rather have a self-sufficient "Hull Tigers" getting closer to Man U's £315 million shirt sponsorship deal than be wondering if every new owner of "Hull City" is the next Bartlett, Hinchcliffe or Lloyd. So I am now pro-name change. Therefore, I am anti-CTWD and, if the results of the ballot are to be believed, I will not be alone, hence the boos.
I like you, Vaslav. You see the world as it is. I don't know about you, but I welcome change, I embrace it. Change is good.