ctwd now out in the open

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Well that's a shame, innit?

Similarly, my only contact with pathetic ****ing tosspots like yourself, who have a problem with people fighting a bonkers club owner who wants to change the club name because othe council wouldn't sell him the stadium, is also only via sites like this one.
 
Carmine Galante. said:
A lot of back slapping and mutual appreciation going on here.

Almost to the point of w**king each other off.

Fact is booing, unless aimed at the opposition is plain wrong.


What if CTWD booed at the booers who had booed them?

What if the away fans then started booing the CTWD lot for booing the booers thinking they were booing their own team.

The pro AA lot then start booing the away fans for booing the CTWD lot who were actually booing them in the first place.

It could go on for 70 minutes and 56 seconds, plus stoppage time.


On the other hand for some cretinous c**t to make an analogy about AA's contribution to our club being akin to someone raping your kids and for it to be allowed by the mods is beyond the pale.


Show any neutral, level headed, decent person a piece of paper which details AA's plans for a name change and I dare say you'll get a fairly indifferent response.

Show that same person X's disgraceful post about children being raped and I dare say you'll get a wholly different response.

Whilst silly bastards like X are aligning themselves to CTWD and are posting such offensive drivel and it being deemed as acceptable, no one apart from me challenged it after all, then CTWD will lose support from rational, reasonable fans.

No doubt Polly will dislike this post.
Click to expand...

Aye your right i should have done. The abuse and name calling of Allam on here goes too far but it never gets stopped. So i must admit i call people **** all the time when i see those ones just dishing abuse to either the Allams or a poster.
Tedious.
 
Chazz Rheinhold said:
Aye your right i should have done. The abuse and name calling of Allam on here goes too far but it never gets stopped. So i must admit i call people **** all the time when i see those ones just dishing abuse to either the Allams or a poster.
Tedious.
Click to expand...
As I said; try focusing on the matters in hand. I, along with plenty of others, do plenty of name-calling on here; if we took everyone to task on every occasion there would be no time left to do anything else.
 
Polly13 said:
Well that's a shame, innit?

Similarly, my only contact with pathetic ****ing tosspots like yourself, who have a problem with people fighting a bonkers club owner who wants to change the club name because othe council wouldn't sell him the stadium, is also only via sites like this one.
Click to expand...


Interesting that you choose to insult me rather than put forward a coherent argument. Quite sad really.
 
Chazz Rheinhold said:
Aye your right i should have done. The abuse and name calling of Allam on here goes too far but it never gets stopped. So i must admit i call people c**t all the time when i see those ones just dishing abuse to either the Allams or a poster.
Tedious.
Click to expand...

Define "too far". I think he's a lying, manipulative w**ker. Is that too far? I think it's spot on considering the circumstances.
 
Polly13 said:
As I said; try focusing on the matters in hand. I, along with plenty of others, do plenty of name-calling on here; if we took everyone to task on every occasion there would be no time left to do anything else.
Click to expand...

Yes lets. Thread title. So you think its perfectly acceptable for ctwd to want and the Allams should accept, the help from them and be given shares in the club. When the Chairman of that organisation has a flask with Allam **** on it. With further posts saying thats what he thinks of them in his emails and his girlfriend says she has heard him say it often enough.

Do you want someone as two faced as that representing your organisation? Yes or No.

Why should the Allams deal with ctwd with that information in the public domain?
 
Chazz Rheinhold said:
Yes lets. Thread title. So you think its perfectly acceptable for ctwd to want and the Allams should accept, the help from them and be given shares in the club. When the Chairman of that organisation has a flask with Allam **** on it. With further posts saying thats what he thinks of them in his emails and his girlfriend says she has heard him say it often enough.

Do you want someone as two faced as that representing your organisation? Yes or No.

Why should the Allams deal with ctwd with that information in the public domain?
Click to expand...
I couldn't give a **** about Mrak Gretton or what his private thoughts are. I couldn't give a **** who leads CTWD. I'm a member, and I support their stance against Allam's plans to change the club name, but that's about it.

I can't understand why so many ****ing knickers are getting twisted.
 
Polly13 said:
Missed that post. Sounds ridiculous though.

Ridiculous doesn't come close.



Not if they're a level headed, decent person who understands what it should mean to support a football club.

Not talking about football fans per say. It might be un popular with you( and me) but it it's hardly a repugnant ideas. A daft idea thought of by a businessman but not something that would offend a non City supporter.

Can't disagree there.

Same rules apply.


Maybe they will, maybe they won't. Why does it even matter to you? You're yet another person for whom the actions of some people associated with the CTWD group seems more important than some of the absurd behaviour demonstrated by our owner.
Click to expand...

Bit presumptuous?

I support CTWD 's actions re the name change but a reality check is needed IMO .

Some of the stuff being posted is turning people away . Shouting those people down and saying they are not 'proper' fans is wearing a bit thin.
 
Fans who are NOT in the ctwd group song CITY TILL I DIE when others do BECAUSE its a CITY song ..... Like me !

Are those who boo , booing me ?

Well I will continue to join in as I always have done long before AA took charge .
 
The point is this.

There were hundreds of spontaneous boos. HDM's Buckingham dared to suggest it was over a thousand.
Certainly it was loud enough to be heard by the North Stand choir, who responded with the "where were you when we were s**t".

Now whether some of the booers are there to capture the Stevie Gs on their iphone, or whether they are the flask brigade who in their opinion never dreamt their team would ever consist of 17 internationals, the point is that they do not have to prove their credentials as a fan to anyone else. They turn up, and pay their money like everyone else.

And as for this "new" rule that CTWD have invented that fans shouldn't boo other fans... absolute bollocks.

So called "fans" do far worse than "boo" their fellow fans on this forum including wishing they endure a slow and painful death.

If a section of our crowd was being racist, or homophobic, of course I would be in my rights to boo them. Why? Because I hold a different opinion to them.

The chant at 19:04 is specifically aimed at Allam. Therefore it is anti-Allam. That is why the booing will continue.
 
Wade Wilson said:
You can't be much older yourself if it took you 30 minutes to read all of this thread...
Click to expand...

300 odd posts/ 30 minutes...I work that out at 10 posts per minute. I wouldn't want anyone to think I didn't give all of these gems of wit and wisdom full and due consideration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back