Well that's a shame, innit? Similarly, my only contact with pathetic ****ing tosspots like yourself, who have a problem with people fighting a bonkers club owner who wants to change the club name because othe council wouldn't sell him the stadium, is also only via sites like this one.
Aye your right i should have done. The abuse and name calling of Allam on here goes too far but it never gets stopped. So i must admit i call people **** all the time when i see those ones just dishing abuse to either the Allams or a poster. Tedious.
As I said; try focusing on the matters in hand. I, along with plenty of others, do plenty of name-calling on here; if we took everyone to task on every occasion there would be no time left to do anything else.
Interesting that you choose to insult me rather than put forward a coherent argument. Quite sad really.
Define "too far". I think he's a lying, manipulative w**ker. Is that too far? I think it's spot on considering the circumstances.
Yes lets. Thread title. So you think its perfectly acceptable for ctwd to want and the Allams should accept, the help from them and be given shares in the club. When the Chairman of that organisation has a flask with Allam **** on it. With further posts saying thats what he thinks of them in his emails and his girlfriend says she has heard him say it often enough. Do you want someone as two faced as that representing your organisation? Yes or No. Why should the Allams deal with ctwd with that information in the public domain?
I've made plenty of coherent arguments about how I feel. Maybe you should read back through the thread.
I couldn't give a **** about Mrak Gretton or what his private thoughts are. I couldn't give a **** who leads CTWD. I'm a member, and I support their stance against Allam's plans to change the club name, but that's about it. I can't understand why so many ****ing knickers are getting twisted.
Time for it to begin then [video=youtube;Td0SYEAlaso]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Td0SYEAlaso[/video]
Bit presumptuous? I support CTWD 's actions re the name change but a reality check is needed IMO . Some of the stuff being posted is turning people away . Shouting those people down and saying they are not 'proper' fans is wearing a bit thin.
Fans who are NOT in the ctwd group song CITY TILL I DIE when others do BECAUSE its a CITY song ..... Like me ! Are those who boo , booing me ? Well I will continue to join in as I always have done long before AA took charge .
The point is this. There were hundreds of spontaneous boos. HDM's Buckingham dared to suggest it was over a thousand. Certainly it was loud enough to be heard by the North Stand choir, who responded with the "where were you when we were s**t". Now whether some of the booers are there to capture the Stevie Gs on their iphone, or whether they are the flask brigade who in their opinion never dreamt their team would ever consist of 17 internationals, the point is that they do not have to prove their credentials as a fan to anyone else. They turn up, and pay their money like everyone else. And as for this "new" rule that CTWD have invented that fans shouldn't boo other fans... absolute bollocks. So called "fans" do far worse than "boo" their fellow fans on this forum including wishing they endure a slow and painful death. If a section of our crowd was being racist, or homophobic, of course I would be in my rights to boo them. Why? Because I hold a different opinion to them. The chant at 19:04 is specifically aimed at Allam. Therefore it is anti-Allam. That is why the booing will continue.
300 odd posts/ 30 minutes...I work that out at 10 posts per minute. I wouldn't want anyone to think I didn't give all of these gems of wit and wisdom full and due consideration.
