ctwd now out in the open

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
look_back_in_amber said:
If you're making any attempt at all to defend that tweet then you also risk losing face Obi, it's completely indefensible, whether someone bought Gretton it or not, it should have been immediately thrown in the bin never to see the light of day again, the inscription on it is way beyond disrespectful!
Click to expand...

Says the moral arbritor!
 
Seems too many people don't realize... allams true intent, he didn't take over the club for our benefit<laugh> and also, the name change has nothing to do with any profit, it's due to the council.. and it was rejected the governing body of english football.. and he still goes on like a f**ing c**t.. and waves his arms like a rugrat.. and carries on.. and then he divides the fans at as well

but the fact we got abel, ramirez, hernandez etc.. certain customers support allam even more... it's f**ing pathetic, can mock newcastle for all you like.. but they are f**ing true passionate fans.. this city and club just f**ing accepts anything

happy and chazz ain't PL fans.. but i don't understand how they can accept this.. i think it's just a forum persona... no true hull city afc fan would accept this... especially if they went to fer ark or boothferry park.. f** sake
 
2014
april 9 f.a. says no. campaign ends.
april 18 mark gretton elected ctwd chairman.
september corpse disinterred, appeal announced. world groans and rolls eyes.
november corpse reburied, for ever. chairman has a choice to make.

[video=youtube;GqH21LEmfbQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqH21LEmfbQ[/video]
 
PLT said:
Certainly: In my opinion, Allam's a ****.

Glad I can be an enormous help.

It's commendable, it's the same thing the OSC do. It'd be impossible for one group to take the stance of its directors if they completely disagree. The OSC stance is neutral regardless of what any individual involved thinks, same as CTWD is anti-name change but not bothered on the owners (probably supportive in fact), regardless of what any individuals involved think.
Click to expand...

Unbelievable! How you got, and manage to retain, the position of a moderator is totally beyond me.
 
Seems some on here wod prefer to support Newcastle. All that badge-making, protest organising, sit ins, banner-making, meetings, statement-writing, website building...wow what passion. Is just supporting your team too boring now or do we need drama off the pitch too? I'd never swap our current situation with the geordies in a million years.
 
Boothferry2Wembley said:
I support his right to run the football club he owns the way he sees fit. It's as simple as that.
Click to expand...

So if he felt it was right to sell all the players and strip assets, would you support that?

Thank **** you have no control over this appeal.


I presume you were one of the people who thought Winkleman was doing the right thing in moving Wimbledon to Milton Keynes.
 
Quill said:
So if he felt it was right to sell all the players and strip assets, would you support that?
Click to expand...

he has to? if he supports the club and how he sees fit?

hypocritical ****S mate

can't stand em, **** the ctwd speech, i want cival war on the stands..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back