ctwd now out in the open

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Sheff U. Gates of 30,000 plus average in the Premier League, now getting 18,000 plus average. 12,000 floating spectators from there, maybe more or less, who knows? add "consumers of football" currently not attending matches (people from Hull took the ferry to watch Grimsby when they were doing better than City. Some people just want to watch a good game of football and are not attached to any particular team ... with cars, motorways, easier communications ..... I remember all the people from Hull who'd travel as far as Liverpool to see Premier League football) ... I have no idea what Dr. Allam's plans are but I wouldn't underestimate him ... I reckon he's capable of selling the club at a profit to someone who won't be as good a custodian of the club as he is ... moving the club west makes sense in a few ways, not in others ..... I'm not thinking like a fan here .... I'm trying to put myself in the position of a businessman who rescued a football club out of a sense of munificence, is finding it's not as much fun as he imagined and wants out but isn't prepared to lose much dosh on the deal and would prefer to make a profit on the whole shebang .... if some "fans" give him little room to negotiate he may not be able to afford to be too choosy about who he sells to. I believe he wants the best for the club but if the wrong person with the right money comes along, he may be glad to take an offer if it removes the burden of having to deal with CTWD. Like anyone else, he wants to be happy, to enjoy life. He thought his plans for Hull City might make fans happy. He was wrong. He'll be hurt and disappointed and think maybe someone else might succeed where he failed. I think he's played a blinder.
 
Youre right, the name wont change. So why is there still a protest against the owners? I'm certainly not gping tp defend the owners actions rrgarding the name chamge, but everything else he has done has beem spot on in my opinion.
The song at 1904 was designated a protest song, saying it now isn't doesn't change perceptions. Action os needed to show that the protest is over. Being as stubborn as the owner won't help anyone.

It wasn't designated a protest song.
 
people say that the ballot had 'leading questions'........... so basically you are saying that people can't make up their own mind about a question?
even if it was: would you like the name to stay the same and so we stagnate and eventually fall into the conference or would you like the Allams to invest in Hull Tigers so that they win the BPL but flush your history down the drain?
People wouldn't have voted at 100% the way you want, cos not everyone is the same.

people say that the ballot had 'leading questions'........... so basically you are saying that people can't make up their own mind about a question?
even if it was: would you like the name to stay the same and so we stagnate and eventually fall into the conference or would you like the Allams to invest in Hull Tigers so that they win the BPL but flush your history down the drain?
People wouldn't have voted at 100% the way you want, cos not everyone is the same.

I have no idea why this posted twice, can a mod delete this one?

so if people were against the name change 100%, it doesnt matter what the question was, ppl would still be able to see through it. I am sure that ppl are inteligent enough to work out what the questions are.
claiming that they "aren't the right questions" seems like an excuse cos they didn't get the answers they desired........................................... sour grapes at all?

difficult for me??
hahaha
seems straight forward actually.
name OR financial security?
#simples

um so you are against the truth?
maybe they should have lied then "OOPS, financially? youre ****ed, sorry about that, didn't see that oh well"

no there are 2, name change or they clear off.

Fool of the Year! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^6
 
It wasn't designated a protest song.

I also think for many fans the chant @ 19:04 is now a celebration of the FA decision and that fans can have a voice.

That's a huge thing in the modern game with multi millionaires calling the shots.

Look at last week's details of Allams appeal, Fans shouldn't have been consulted in the opinion of our owners lawyers.

I actively back CTWD
I do respect what the owners have done but his insistence on pushing the name change is stubborn and the primary cause for current divisions of fans not CTWD.
 
The campaign's finished, the FA said no. There's the process of arbitration and then there's the reconciliation afterwards. Assem Allam has told us consistently he has run out of money, there is a gap to be closed. CTWD can help close that gap, it just needs a bit of goodwill on both sides.

<laugh> Oh do **** off you set of pompous ****s.
 
Bearing in mind the result of the referendum amongst pass holders and the fact that previously silent fans are now booing what they perceive to be protests against the owner they voted in favour of, I presume it's possible a new referendum could be held where passholders are again asked to vote but this time on those who "protest" having their season passes refunded and their seats being offered to pro Allam fans. If a section of fans won't stop their "protests" and a growing number of fans respond by booing, it might be the best option all round and anyway, why would fans who despise The Allams want to fund the Allams' business? That seems to be a good way forward. The anti-Allam minority and the pro Allam majority go their separate ways. It's a shame but it's better than infighting between pro and anti Allam factions which The Police may prefer to avoid dealing with. It's a bit like the Scottish Independence referendum. Groups of people want different things and drift apart. The local media and BBs carry stories of disenchanted City fans threatening to support Ferriby or other local non-league teams (and with decent support, Ferriby may well soon be in the Football League which would suit those City fans hankering for "the good old days" finding the PL not to their liking). The alternative is the anti-Allam faction gets their wish, Dr. Allam sells the squad and leaves the club owing him whatever ... a new owner arrives and time will tell whether they care about Hull City or not and Hull City will find their natural level in the league ... which, if history is to be any guide, is mid-championship .... thinking along the same lines as Sheff Weds, Sheff Utd., Leeds, Millwall, Derby, Notts Forest etc. .... City's fan base seems to be polarising along these lines ... the only thing I don't get is .... the fans that disapprove of the Allams, are not that impressed with the Premier League ... exactly what are their aspirations for Hull City? We know they don't approve of The Allams, they want the name to stay the same yet no fans group has ever come close to raising enough money to run the club ... what do CTWD et al want? It would seem "nothing" since apparently, they're not campaigning against anything anymore. A point worth pondering is ... let's say The Allams manage to cover their costs by selling the squad and taking the parachute money and City are run along the same lines as Swansea .... what will be the gates at the KC, will it make business sense for the club, Hull FC and the council ... history tells us that Hull City attracts asset stripper owners from out of town so how is the club re-organised to suit CTWD and the "protesting" fans? .... and if fans protest groups can't find anyone with better judgement than "hip flask man", who is going to run the club and how successful will they be?

CTWD is not anti Allam. So all that post is based on a false premise. Sorry.
 
"In August 2012, Fraser & Neave has accepted an offer from Heineken to acquire its stake in APB for US$4.1 billion.[5] Shareholders approved the deal during the extraordinary general meeting held on September 28, 2012"

The company that owns the Tiger Beer brand are worth billions. They could buy City out of their loose change and, after the Wimbledon / MK Dons switch, simply re-brand City "Tigers" and base them anywhere they wanted in England and how much would they care what CTWD or hip flask man thought about it? They could sell more sponsorship to other Tiger brands ... it could be a nice little earner ... a new, huge stadium west of Hull (selling Tiger Beer, brewed in Edinburgh) offering easier access to Premier League football starved folk from West Yorkshire plus loyal Tigers fans from Hull prepared to travel westwards .... I reckon the force that is making this scenario most likely is CTWD ..... just outside Goole or Howden? .... under FA rules, that would help "The Tigers" run an academy with a better catchment area as well ... I don't want this to happen but this is ultimately what I reckon will come to pass ... how close to Hull does a new stadium have to be? According to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Keynes_Dons_F.C. not very close to Hull ..... so City's fans are quite capable of campaigning their club out of the city entirely having to leave town to protest outside their club's ground .... maybe accepting "we've never had it so good" and a bit of compromise might not be a bad idea looking at how bad the other options could be. The club is Dr. Allams to sell. Hull City have, it seems, never had enough fans willing to put up enough money to buy the club and, as for help from HCC, forget it .... there are two ruby teams that would want equal treatment and support. Politically it will never happen ....

Fa rules prevent a club having a name that includes a sponsorship. I think you need to go back to Mr Mooney and get your basic facts straight before posting again.
 
Sheff U. Gates of 30,000 plus average in the Premier League, now getting 18,000 plus average. 12,000 floating spectators from there, maybe more or less, who knows? add "consumers of football" currently not attending matches (people from Hull took the ferry to watch Grimsby when they were doing better than City. Some people just want to watch a good game of football and are not attached to any particular team ... with cars, motorways, easier communications ..... I remember all the people from Hull who'd travel as far as Liverpool to see Premier League football) ... I have no idea what Dr. Allam's plans are but I wouldn't underestimate him ... I reckon he's capable of selling the club at a profit to someone who won't be as good a custodian of the club as he is ... moving the club west makes sense in a few ways, not in others ..... I'm not thinking like a fan here .... I'm trying to put myself in the position of a businessman who rescued a football club out of a sense of munificence, is finding it's not as much fun as he imagined and wants out but isn't prepared to lose much dosh on the deal and would prefer to make a profit on the whole shebang .... if some "fans" give him little room to negotiate he may not be able to afford to be too choosy about who he sells to. I believe he wants the best for the club but if the wrong person with the right money comes along, he may be glad to take an offer if it removes the burden of having to deal with CTWD. Like anyone else, he wants to be happy, to enjoy life. He thought his plans for Hull City might make fans happy. He was wrong. He'll be hurt and disappointed and think maybe someone else might succeed where he failed. I think he's played a blinder.

He doesn't have to deal with CTWD regarding the name change. He has to deal with the FA.

That's three in a row that you've based on false premises. Extraordinary.
 
Would you really be happy with an owner who operates like that?

So many people are happy (with their 30 pieces of silver) current owners business approach, regardless of impact on fans.

If the theoretical owner had used the difference to fund the club (& therefore reduce the debt (gift?) and keep the name, YES
 
Anyway, I accept the "Allam Era" has come, or is coming to an end. As illustrated by the attitude of owners all over the Premier League, of large and small clubs, since City's next owner is unlikely to be the fans in the form of a Tigers 2000 esque group, unlikely to have any connection to Hull, perhaps not even British or resident in the UK, consideration for the name, badge, team strip and so on is likely to be less in evidence. As far as Dr. Allam is concerned, if he'd never got involved with Hull City, it's unlikely tweets such as those posted by Mr. Gretton would have appeared and why should a rich man hang around waiting for the next Mark Gretton tweet or the next expletive laced diatribe on a forum such as this? So ... who will be the next owner of Hull City ... the rumour doing the rounds is Peter Ridsdale (banned from being a company director) fronting a purchase by a Macau casino owner (another dodgy wezzy after Hinchcliffe .... do they clone them over there or something?).... personally, I hope Tiger Beer buy us ....
 
CTWD is not anti Allam. So all that post is based on a false premise. Sorry.

So you think fans make no connection between Mark Gretton's tweet and CTWD?

I perceive CTWD as being anti-Allam. The chairman's tweet and hip flask are enough for me. I perceive Tony Blair to be a liar. He'd probably not agree. I don't know how many fans perceive CTWD as being anti-Allam but I expect further, increasingly loud booing of a protest at 1904 perceived as anti-Allam by pro-Allam fans .... even after Allam has gone .... booing sections of the support can be habit forming, a celebration and a "tradition" too ..... almost like "old firm" matches .... it'd be ironic if CTWD succeeded in killing Hull City off ... here's how it would be done. Hull City is bankrupted by Dr. Allam. A new club is formed called Hull Tigers ... or simply "Tigers" ... that team climbs the football pyramid and becomes a Premier League brand .... whether fans like it or not, clubs need to either break even or find a benefactor. Anyway, this is pretty much history now. If the FA doesn't allow a name change, the Allams will be off, the club may already have been sold ... we can only hope the new owner isn't yet another Lloyd, Hinchcliffe, Belton, Bartlett etc.
 
I perceive it as being anti-Allam. That's enough for me. I perceive Tony Blair to be a liar. He'd probably not agree. I don't know how many fans perceive CTWD as being anti-Allam but I expect further, increasingly loud booing if a protest at 1904 is perceived by pro-Allam fans

I used to be anti-name change and pro-Allam, now I'm just anti-name change. I really, really hope he sticks to his word for once and pisses off.
 
So you think fans make no connection between Mark Gretton's tweet and CTWD?

I perceive CTWD as being anti-Allam. The chairman's tweet and hip flask are enough for me. I perceive Tony Blair to be a liar. He'd probably not agree. I don't know how many fans perceive CTWD as being anti-Allam but I expect further, increasingly loud booing of a protest at 1904 perceived as anti-Allam by pro-Allam fans .... even after Allam has gone .... booing sections of the support can be habit forming, a celebration and a "tradition" too ..... almost like "old firm" matches .... it'd be ironic if CTWD succeeded in killing Hull City off ... here's how it would be done. Hull City is bankrupted by Dr. Allam. A new club is formed called Hull Tigers ... or simply "Tigers" ... that team climbs the football pyramid and becomes a Premier League brand .... whether fans like it or not, clubs need to either break even or find a benefactor. Anyway, this is pretty much history now. If the FA doesn't allow a name change, the Allams will be off, the club may already have been sold ... we can only hope the new owner isn't yet another Lloyd, Hinchcliffe, Belton, Bartlett etc.

Is that strong weed, my man?
 
I think we're all quite tired of this now. It's not a nice distraction is it. I don't think the FA will sanction the Allams name change,we all seem to agree on that and so if they carry out their threat to sell,they will need to first find a buyer.

Unfortunately for the Allams, i don't think that will be so easy,as they don't own the ground. So it looks like were in for a very long haul,whilst being stuck in a kind of limbo. Not very nice is it ?

The unexpected in fighting (i mean at the games,not on the forums,that's just a forum thing),promises to make things even worse than they have been.

And so it's Steve Bruce i feel for. It can't be easy keeping a feeling of unity around the place,with all of this as a backdrop. We can only hope he has the patience and desire to stick around,when he (inevitably) gets other offers.
 
So you think fans make no connection between Mark Gretton's tweet and CTWD?

I perceive CTWD as being anti-Allam. The chairman's tweet and hip flask are enough for me. I perceive Tony Blair to be a liar. He'd probably not agree. I don't know how many fans perceive CTWD as being anti-Allam but I expect further, increasingly loud booing of a protest at 1904 perceived as anti-Allam by pro-Allam fans .... even after Allam has gone .... booing sections of the support can be habit forming, a celebration and a "tradition" too ..... almost like "old firm" matches .... it'd be ironic if CTWD succeeded in killing Hull City off ... here's how it would be done. Hull City is bankrupted by Dr. Allam. A new club is formed called Hull Tigers ... or simply "Tigers" ... that team climbs the football pyramid and becomes a Premier League brand .... whether fans like it or not, clubs need to either break even or find a benefactor. Anyway, this is pretty much history now. If the FA doesn't allow a name change, the Allams will be off, the club may already have been sold ... we can only hope the new owner isn't yet another Lloyd, Hinchcliffe, Belton, Bartlett etc.

You've filled this thread with long posts making false accusations and showing your complete ignorance of the topic under discussion. Over a dozen posts of utter bollocks, it's not a great start on here.
 
All fans need to avoid "the boy who cried wolf" syndrome ... where they always seem to be campaigning against something ... then, when they really have something to campaign about, everyone just says "oh it's CTWD again" .... and switches off ... if CTWD campaign when things are this good .........
Good. Keep switching off. And **** off while yer at it.
 
OK yawn. I hope you sleep great at night.
I will slit my wrists cos I am not involved,
THERE ARENT MORE IMPORTANT THINGS IN LIFE.. like people being murdered by ISIS and the refugee crisis in syria................... NO CTWD outranks that, and by recognising that you are a true Hull City fan!

you make me sick lambo.
Is this meant to be ironic? The heavyweight poster of bollox who never goes to matches?