It's a pointless discussion, there's zero chance of anyone mounting a legal challenge to the FA's right to ban players for taking drugs.
Agreed, but that wouldn't be the grounds on which it would go to court.
It's a pointless discussion, there's zero chance of anyone mounting a legal challenge to the FA's right to ban players for taking drugs.
Agreed, but that wouldn't be the grounds on which it would go to court.
All speculation, but I think when we were bidding £9m for Odubajo and Gray, it was in the belief that we were about to agree a deal for Hernandez, I also suspect the £9m included £1m in add-on's, so we were probably £1-1.5m off Brentford's valuation.
I wouldn't read too much into Bruce's comments about keeping Hernandez, he's bigging the player up if he stays, while pushing anyone who wants him to get on with it.
The reason I don't think we wanted the loan, was we paid over £9m for him, we'll have paid at least a third up front, probably with another third this season and a final third next season. We're desperately trying to flog him for £6m so we get him off the wage bill, while also clearing our fee commitments on him, otherwise we still have to fund those fees.
Hull City employ well over 100 staff (players, coaches, management, office staff etc), yet I believe that currently 10% of our total wage bill goes to Hernandez and Jelavic. It's no wonder we want one gone before adding another.
I appreciate that can you make a decent case for slinging a bit more at the job with the potential riches on offer next season, but I can also see a decent case for not doing so.
Agreed, but that wouldn't be the grounds on which it would go to court.
I did read Balkan Tiger's post but Sterling Archer didn't seem convinced so I posted a newspaper article confirming what BT had said.
Will let you of the French connection in that case. Yes it was. They just lined up in 2 banks of four and lumped it up to their big striker. Nothing happened in the first half other than the referee playing them in and McG having to make a save.
All speculation, but I think when we were bidding £9m for Odubajo and Gray, it was in the belief that we were about to agree a deal for Hernandez, I also suspect the £9m included £1m in add-on's, so we were probably £1-1.5m off Brentford's valuation.
I wouldn't read too much into Bruce's comments about keeping Hernandez, he's bigging the player up if he stays, while pushing anyone who wants him to get on with it.
The reason I don't think we wanted the loan, was we paid over £9m for him, we'll have paid at least a third up front, probably with another third this season and a final third next season. We're desperately trying to flog him for £6m so we get him off the wage bill, while also clearing our fee commitments on him, otherwise we still have to fund those fees.
Hull City employ well over 100 staff (players, coaches, management, office staff etc), yet I believe that currently 10% of our total wage bill goes to Hernandez and Jelavic. It's no wonder we want one gone before adding another.
I appreciate that can you make a decent case for slinging a bit more at the job with the potential riches on offer next season, but I can also see a decent case for not doing so.
Hayden's performance might be being inflated a bit by the fact he came on late when most would have been exhausted by the heat. Same perhaps for Abel, although his attitude was the main positive.
It's bang on! If you want a new car! You sell the one you've got if you can't afford to run two!! Or four if we're talking about strikers?I do not think that this is too far of the mark, I think itwas the timing of the deal and not the money.
It's bang on! If you want a new car! You sell the one you've got if you can't afford to run two!! Or four if we're talking about strikers?
But you exchange contracts before you move.......But you also ensure you have a new car lined up before you sell the old one, otherwise you run the risk of spending weeks walking everywhere!
You line up a new house before selling the old one, so that you don't end up homeless.
But if the buyer of your current house pulls out then you pull out of buying your new one.But you also ensure you have a new car lined up before you sell the old one, otherwise you run the risk of spending weeks walking everywhere!
You line up a new house before selling the old one, so that you don't end up homeless.
Or possibly end up with 2 homes and a hell of a lot of carrying costs and the possibility of having to sell the original home at a reduced price.But you also ensure you have a new car lined up before you sell the old one, otherwise you run the risk of spending weeks walking everywhere!
You line up a new house before selling the old one, so that you don't end up homeless.
Or possibly end up with 2 homes and a hell of a lot of carrying costs and the possibility of having to sell the original home at a reduced price.
Happens all the time. Ever heard of "bridge financing" ?Don't think that's ever likely to happen when moving home.. or you're doing something wrong.
Sam Allardyce just pointed out that possession isn't important it's what you do with it
Steve Bruce seems to think differently
Happens all the time. Ever heard of "bridge financing" ?