Summer '24 transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Mepham and Samed are clearly an indication of using the Clarke money even if they are just loan signings. The loan fees and wage contributions will be high considering where they are coming from. Aleksic and the rumoured lad from Belgium is an indication that we are increasing the quality of our younger signings because we have more money to spend. The Clarke money is being spent.

However, failing to secure a striker will be really, really poor. When you sell a player for a big fee you can't come away from the window without our biggest need being filled. Simply inexcusable.
 
They have a problem with closing deals for strikers. It’s a fact.
I agree with that and I agree think it’s likely our striker wages aren’t competitive, but equally I wouldn’t want to pay high wages unless we’re certain of they’re temporary/ get riddable.
 
Mepham and Samed are clearly an indication of using the Clarke money even if they are just loan signings. The loan fees and wage contributions will be high considering where they are coming from. Aleksic and the rumoured lad from Belgium is an indication that we are increasing the quality of our younger signings because we have more money to spend. The Clarke money is being spent.

However, failing to secure a striker will be really, really poor. When you sell a player for a big fee you can't come away from the window without our biggest need being filled. Simply inexcusable.

this is going to sound reactionary but if we don’t bring in a strong number 9 then I think we’re wasting our time with the strong loan signings. Both of them are clearly aimed at promotion this year. Promotion will not happen with our current forward options, so why block the development of our players, and waste the Clarke money, with senior loans.
 
I dont care if we spent 1 or 5 million on a striker as long as they fit our system and can contribute NOW

And is Wilson that guy when mendy, canon, simic and orban were linked? Without writing him off, on paper he's the least appealing option and conveniently the cheapest.

You don't have to spend but I would expect to see a greater calibre considering the Clarke fee and potential Ekwah move.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Random lad
this is going to sound reactionary but if we don’t bring in a strong number 9 then I think we’re wasting our time with the strong loan signings. Both of them are clearly aimed at promotion this year. Promotion will not happen with our current forward options, so why block the development of our players, and waste the Clarke money, with senior loans.
We dont know how isidor will do tho, i get we need another striker but Isidor hasnt even kicked a ball yet so he might actually be the perfect striker for us
 
God folk losing the plot already, lets wait n see who we bring in and how we look at the end of the window

No point moaning about things until it actually closes, then we will be able to tell how we feel about the window
It's normal though Scout, we've missed out on the two main ones, yeah they were hyped up, but I think people kept their cool and hoped rather than expected. You know the supposed alternatives in this situation, others probably don't, we again look like we have failed to sign that no.9 we crave. Isidor, I think will be good and might well be a striker, he's got more about him than Rusyn, but its still up in the air.

We speak with emotion I think! Let us hope.
 
this is going to sound reactionary but if we don’t bring in a strong number 9 then I think we’re wasting our time with the strong loan signings. Both of them are clearly aimed at promotion this year. Promotion will not happen with our current forward options, so why block the development of our players, and waste the Clarke money, with senior loans.
That sounds reactionary