Flagging…

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure what's happened here today,has someone been offended?

If I've offended anyone,just say so,I won't be offended:emoticon-0103-cool:
 
And you think that actually happens in schools?

Of course it doesn't. At no point have trans people gone into schools and done sexual dances.

That line is trotted out by the same group that claim Tom Hanks is a ****phile and that any day now the white hats are going to release med bed technology into the world and everybody can just be cured instantly.

That group have duped people out of millions of their hard earned. I ****ing hate it. Which is why I've spent the last five years working with others to **** on them. At least there's been progress.
 
Last edited:
-> All this because of a multicoloured flag on a Facebook post. Do we even have mods on this forum any more?.
-> It was an instagram post actually get your facts right.

And our mods don't have user rights to remove posts on Instagram anyway :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
All this because of a multicoloured flag on a Facebook post.

Do we even have mods on this forum any more?.
Interested?

A brief job description...

Mon-Sun.

7 x 24 hour shifts.

Must be prepared to sit and sift through pages and pages of internet sabre rattling and petty argument.

Must be prepared to give up all other normal activities and Family life.

Expected Salary.....ZILCH.



To apply,click HERE.


To remove,click HERE.:emoticon-0103-cool:
 
Last edited:
"It only serves to highlight differences".

Yep, exactly. That's exactly why we do it. Because the LGBT community has come under such horrendous abuse, some appalling tragedies and non-sensical legal decisions, we want people to treat us the same as every other human being. Pride is about being able to express who you are, in the same way that people wear a poppy to express respect for fallen soldiers or people of the Muslim faith wearing a Burqa to honour their religion. It isn't a political thing, like BLM (who also make a very good case), it's an identity that we want to be and are proud of. The rainbow flag is, for me, the epitome of "don't let the bastards grind you down".

To you, it might be a "stupid symbol", but to millions of people worldwide it's a sign of progress, of freedom and acceptance, qualities which many find hard to come by as they grow up and try and discover who they really are. Pride parades are a celebration of that journey, that togetherness in the community and the freedom to be who you are.

In a perfect world, Pride wouldn't exist. Neither would JSO, BLM or Kick it Out. They only exist because they have to, because if they didn't, nothing would change. The world isn't seeing more Pride parades because society has naturally shifted, society has shifted because of the activism that shifted it. Some cis people get a bee in their bonnet about it, but honestly, that's kind of the point because if you didn't get cross with it, you wouldn't complain about it and the issue wouldn't get spoken about nearly as much.

Society, on the whole, isn't fully inclusive. It isn't. It's better now than it was, but it's far from perfect. When a celeb coming out as gay isn't front page news, or when anything to do with being non-cis isn't prefixed by the word "woke", or when trans people aren't viewed as monsters, you'll know we're getting closer.

Football as a sport, indeed most sports, support these views and issues and want to show solidarity, which is fantastic progress and must be a real boon to those lads who are non-cis in a sport that rarely has openly gay players. To keep football as football, you would have to ban all of the sponsors as well, some of the goal celebrations, even some of the players tattoos I imagine carry messages that are non-football related. When we gave the money from the Hatayspor game to the victims of the Earthquake in Turkey/Syria, was that football related? Or, perhaps it's much easier to have sport play a supporting role in contemporary issues and allow some of the considerable wealth and platforming that it carries to help people affected by them.

I'm sorry if once a year is an issue being "rammed down your throat", the odd press release, pride corner flag or rainbow laces on boots isn't really dominating the landscape is it?

Football as a sport, indeed most sports, support these views and issues and want to show solidarity, which is fantastic progress and must be a real boon to those lads who are non-cis in a sport that rarely has openly gay players.

What I do find rather hypocritical are the likes of Lineker and players such as Jordan Henderson, who say they support these causes and players wearing rainbow laces etc only to **** off for a heap or money to countries that have appalling human rights on these issues.
 
IMHO, the worst thing to happen to LGB rights in recent years has been the forced-teaming with TQ+ along with the confusion of sex versus gender. LGB folk had pretty much got to legal equality in the UK with the introduction of marriage equality (still the state church ie CofE to go), and had majority public acceptance that homophobia is a bad thing. Instead of then focussing on supporting LGB folk in areas where they still faced bigotry (like football!), or for youngsters who are confused about their sexuality and facing hostility from family and community, or supporting LGB people abroad in areas where homosexuality is still illegal, Stonewall went a bit mad with the TQ+ stuff. And now lesbians like Ric's daughter are called sexual racists for preferring their sexual partners to be female bodied, mediocre male athletes are taking over women's sports (all medalists in the women 800m at the 2012 olympics were biological men with a developmental sex disorder, as does Barbra Banda, the captain of Zambia's women's football team) and many schools now have converted their toilet blocks to unisex instead of boys/girls which sound an utter misery for all pupils whatever their sex or gender or sexuality.

How any of that supports LGB people to be able to live their lives free of bigotry and harassment beats me.
 
The problem with conversations like this in an open forum is that it becomes a hot bed of extreme takes on both sides.

Do Trans people deserve to exist? In my view - undoubtedly yes and they deserve more protection.

Should sexualised drag acts be performed in front of children? Absolutely not, but it doesn't really have anything to do with the former does it?

Should trans women (and men) be able to participate in elite sport? Depends on the person, the sport and the science as to how much of an advantage biological sex makes doesn't it? Sport and natural biological performance aren't ever really straight forward conversations.

Does the pride flag appearing in one instagram post mean anything but a show of support? Your view on that, I don't think so but I'd never call it '****' when I know it helps others.

As soon as these kinds of tropes find their way into a conversation about LGBT+ people, I'm afraid to say I lose faith in the conversation. It becomes a pointless bit of political point scoring at the expense of a lot of people who just want to live their lives in a way that isn't going to hurt anyone else.

There are militant people of all colours, religions, sexualities, genders. Just because you've heard one thing about them you don't like doesn't mean that the rest either follow that view point or it devalues all the other reasons that they are allowed to be who they want to be.

This is not me saying these conversations shouldn't be had (before the free speech lovers come calling for my head), but instead don't we owe it to people to take more of a light and shade view than a black and white one?
 
Should trans women (and men) be able to participate in elite sport? Depends on the person, the sport and the science as to how much of an advantage biological sex makes doesn't it? Sport and natural biological performance aren't ever really straight forward conversations.
of course transwomen and transmen should be able to participate in elite sport, as in any other part of public life. In the sex category appropriate for them, like Quinn the Canadian footballer.

The science is clear that men as a category are taller and stronger than women, with greater lung capacity. As a consequence there’s not many elite sports where men and women compete as equals. Dressage is the only one I can think of off the top of my head.
 
of course transwomen and transmen should be able to participate in elite sport, as in any other part of public life. In the sex category appropriate for them, like Quinn the Canadian footballer.

The science is clear that men as a category are taller and stronger than women, with greater lung capacity. As a consequence there’s not many elite sports where men and women compete as equals. Dressage is the only one I can think of off the top of my head.

Darts? :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights and Drew
Status
Not open for further replies.