only if you believe in your so called 1st and 2nd optionsThere's a third option?
Anyway, have we signed anyone else yet?
only if you believe in your so called 1st and 2nd optionsThere's a third option?
Sam Smith and Quentin Crisp.only if you believe in your so called 1st and 2nd options
Anyway, have we signed anyone else yet?
The one’s that are infiltrating certain schools and having trans story hour whilst carrying out sexualised dances in front of very young children. Yes that ****ing offends me.
And you think that actually happens in schools?
trigger
All this because of a multicoloured flag on a Facebook post.
Do we even have mods on this forum any more?.
Interested?All this because of a multicoloured flag on a Facebook post.
Do we even have mods on this forum any more?.
Oh, don't stop there, I'm always willing to learn. Please can you explain your viewpoint?only if you believe in your so called 1st and 2nd options![]()
I have done. I also said I'd rather we left the topic alone now.Oh, don't stop there, I'm always willing to learn. Please can you explain your viewpoint?
I’m offendedAll this because of a multicoloured flag on a Facebook post.
Do we even have mods on this forum any more?.

That doesn’t actually happen in this country.
I posted a video of it happeningWhich isn't happening.
"It only serves to highlight differences".
Yep, exactly. That's exactly why we do it. Because the LGBT community has come under such horrendous abuse, some appalling tragedies and non-sensical legal decisions, we want people to treat us the same as every other human being. Pride is about being able to express who you are, in the same way that people wear a poppy to express respect for fallen soldiers or people of the Muslim faith wearing a Burqa to honour their religion. It isn't a political thing, like BLM (who also make a very good case), it's an identity that we want to be and are proud of. The rainbow flag is, for me, the epitome of "don't let the bastards grind you down".
To you, it might be a "stupid symbol", but to millions of people worldwide it's a sign of progress, of freedom and acceptance, qualities which many find hard to come by as they grow up and try and discover who they really are. Pride parades are a celebration of that journey, that togetherness in the community and the freedom to be who you are.
In a perfect world, Pride wouldn't exist. Neither would JSO, BLM or Kick it Out. They only exist because they have to, because if they didn't, nothing would change. The world isn't seeing more Pride parades because society has naturally shifted, society has shifted because of the activism that shifted it. Some cis people get a bee in their bonnet about it, but honestly, that's kind of the point because if you didn't get cross with it, you wouldn't complain about it and the issue wouldn't get spoken about nearly as much.
Society, on the whole, isn't fully inclusive. It isn't. It's better now than it was, but it's far from perfect. When a celeb coming out as gay isn't front page news, or when anything to do with being non-cis isn't prefixed by the word "woke", or when trans people aren't viewed as monsters, you'll know we're getting closer.
Football as a sport, indeed most sports, support these views and issues and want to show solidarity, which is fantastic progress and must be a real boon to those lads who are non-cis in a sport that rarely has openly gay players. To keep football as football, you would have to ban all of the sponsors as well, some of the goal celebrations, even some of the players tattoos I imagine carry messages that are non-football related. When we gave the money from the Hatayspor game to the victims of the Earthquake in Turkey/Syria, was that football related? Or, perhaps it's much easier to have sport play a supporting role in contemporary issues and allow some of the considerable wealth and platforming that it carries to help people affected by them.
I'm sorry if once a year is an issue being "rammed down your throat", the odd press release, pride corner flag or rainbow laces on boots isn't really dominating the landscape is it?
of course transwomen and transmen should be able to participate in elite sport, as in any other part of public life. In the sex category appropriate for them, like Quinn the Canadian footballer.Should trans women (and men) be able to participate in elite sport? Depends on the person, the sport and the science as to how much of an advantage biological sex makes doesn't it? Sport and natural biological performance aren't ever really straight forward conversations.
of course transwomen and transmen should be able to participate in elite sport, as in any other part of public life. In the sex category appropriate for them, like Quinn the Canadian footballer.
The science is clear that men as a category are taller and stronger than women, with greater lung capacity. As a consequence there’s not many elite sports where men and women compete as equals. Dressage is the only one I can think of off the top of my head.
Darts?![]()