Does the Burnley board realise that we have a new owner, they think that they are dealing with Donald & Co still...Laughable!!!!!!Nee chance we're going to take £9m for him man, absolute insult to the lads ability.
Does the Burnley board realise that we have a new owner, they think that they are dealing with Donald & Co still...Laughable!!!!!!Nee chance we're going to take £9m for him man, absolute insult to the lads ability.
I intimated this the other day with regards to the endless what its regards Stewart.There's a continual onslaught of 'if the club do this it's bad' ...
... but no praise when they don't do that thing.
We've had some real classics from 'if we sell Dan Neil' to 'if we sell Roberts' and many more.
It's as if people want to get a dig in before the club robs them of the chance.
20m is more like what we would be wantingCould be that we value him at 14/15 and they're inching their way towards it. Personally I'd have said no less than 20 but then it's not my money.
If you think joining Burnley is the best thing for your client … agents make no cash from status quo.Agents literal job is to get best deal for their clients.
If he doesn’t they lose their clients.
If you think joining Burnley is the best think for your client … agents make no cash from status quo.
20m is more like what we would be wanting
I also agree we shouldn't be discussing Premiership transfers on here and especially not the scum who mean nothing to me.
it's frustrating thinking updates on here are new news stories about our club when most are not.
This is my thought as well in that it is paper talk.we don't even know if these bids have actually been offered or if it is all just social media 'lets-get-clicks' bollox, every player has a price and at some point the club will decide when the time is right, until then we can only wait...two good lads have been released by the club, both popular with the fans, players and staff but that is how it works unfortunately.
i may be wrong but i thought the club usually throws a list up of pre-season games by now on the safc.com site...anyone knows if/when it gets updated?
Biggest issue with selling Jacky or Roberts is that you cannot improve on them at this level.
Not without spending what we get or more to do so, and somehow either finding an absolute gem from abroad or having someone drop from PL.
To sell Jacky now for anything less than a massive premium would put a question mark over how ambitious we are to reach the PL soon.
We can’t realistically replace like for like, let alone better.
Harte has done no wrong. Deals last summer were based on newly promoted. Established at the higher level it’s right they’d maybe feel they deserve a bit on top and the club will have factored this in.
20m is more like what we would be wanting
Yeah it’s stupid for sky sports to even state that figureAgreed mate, we should be telling them to stop calling unless it’s at least double the last offer.
£9m is an absolute piss take.
9 mill is a jokeDoes anyone know if the KLD twitter account is real?
3 hours ago he put up a tweet saying 'the reaction in the Sunderland board as the third bid for Jack Clarke slides across the table' and it was followed by a laughing gif.
The tweet was then deleted.
There’s evidence of him saying ‘if clubs want to bid we can’t stop them and it might be accepted ‘ in the media which is a thinly veiled invitation to get busy. Sadly it’s what agents do in game ruined by tv money and we’ll be doing the same, but Harte will be pushing him away as it’s more lucrative for Harte.There’s nothing to support Harte pushing him towards Burnley
There’s evidence of him saying ‘if clubs want to bid we can’t stop them and it might be accepted ‘ in the media which is a thinly veiled invitation to get busy. Sadly it’s what agents do in game ruined by tv money and we’ll be doing the same, but Harte will be pushing him away as it’s more lucrative for Harte.