S.A.F.C. - the future

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The problem is, they go around claiming this and that because of their sources, but have they ever provided an exclusive? Genuine question?
TBF, that goes for a few posters on here as well, we seem to laud the ITK's for their claims ( because of their sources ) then someone called Dreyfus pops up as the main man and nee ****er had a clue beforehand. One mans ITK is another mans bullshitter.
 
I'm confused. In one post you say Methven has been on site and running things daily for the last 2 and a half years
but now you're saying he hasn't been on site.
And you're getting upset because people are questioning you. Are you suprised.
Not to mention the "I've already said too much" bollox.

Happy to have you on board mate its a good forum with a lot of lads who know a lot about the club
So if you turn up with an agenda don't spit you're dummy out if people question it.

I should have been clearer. He was on site before he resigned. But the point is he still influences things even though he’s resigned. Apologies for the confusion.

I’m not particularly upset. I’ve said what I’ve said in good faith.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sheepman
Aye, that tippy tappy ****e away at old Trafford when we dominated the game from start to finish, the move that lead to borini hitting the bar etc, was boring as **** to watch like.
This is madness. I never said every single game under Poyet was ****e. It mostly was though and it did finish that way. He also thought that Bridcutt could play for Real Madrid. But, yeah, we played a good game and we made a move that hit the cross bar when Poyet was manager. I guess we should bring him back, after all.
 
People seem worried that the manager will be announced before the SpD. However, could it be possible that the SpD has been chosen but can't be announced until late December, but has had an involvement in the choice of manager, who can take up the position almost immediately?
That’s assuming Stefan Shwartz knows all about Paul Cook <doh>
 
TBF, that goes for a few posters on here as well, we seem to laud the ITK's for their claims ( because of their sources ) then someone called Dreyfus pops up as the main man and nee ****er had a clue beforehand.

One mans ITK is another mans bullshitter.

Do you have anyone down as a bullshitter or are you happy that the lads, who've been posting, are honest?

Did WMS, Mooney, or anyone else ever mention Dreyfus?

Did any of them claim FPP would still be involved?
 
Last edited:
This, I don't understand the clamour to bring him back. His last few games were just marking time waiting for the sack, picking strange teams to accelerate it.
You must have forgotten that we played well at OT and made a good move that we didn't score from when Poyet was manager.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Philftm
I should have been clearer. He was on site before he resigned.

But the point is he still influences things even though he’s resigned. Apologies for the confusion.

I’m not particularly upset. I’ve said what I’ve said in good faith.

He came in with Donald who still owns the club, of course he'd have a voice.

But there's absolutely no evidence to suggest that will continue.

Can I ask, not demand, what has he influenced most since he resigned?

As far as I can see the club has just trundled along aimlessly since then ....


... don't worry about listing them all but could you just give one example of what you're claiming?
 
Northern Echo reporting manager should be announced by weekend..lines up with the info I'm getting...

Lots happening behind the scenes..lots of negativity about as well...

For everyone's info...Dreyfus and Satori want and are determined to be successful here...a 6% shareholder will not distract them from achieving success..

KTF
Satori has been here with the chuckle brothers from day one and I’ve seen little evidence of him wanting to be successful to be honest.
 
Satori has been here with the chuckle brothers from day one and I’ve seen little evidence of him wanting to be successful to be honest.

Sartori has been a minority shareholder with little power other than a voice. For all we know he's been shouting in the background and ignored.

Things may be different when he's a majority shareholder (or part of)
 
He came in with Donald who still owns the club, of course he'd have a voice.

But there's absolutely no evidence to suggest that will continue.

Can I ask, not demand, what has he influenced most since he resigned?

As far as I can see the club has just trundled along aimlessly since then ....


... don't worry about listing them all but could you just give one example of what you're claiming?

Appointing the CEO.
 
I should have been clearer. He was on site before he resigned. But the point is he still influences things even though he’s resigned. Apologies for the confusion.

I’m not particularly upset. I’ve said what I’ve said in good faith.

In terms of what he is influencing since he resigned, can you give examples?
 
Sartori has been a minority shareholder with little power other than a voice. For all we know he's been shouting in the background and ignored.

Things may be different when he's a majority shareholder (or part of)
I thought he was on board mainly for when additional finance was needed in the Championship and Premier League campaigns.
Also didn’t he have the minor matter of a presidential campaign?