S.A.F.C. - the future

TBF, that goes for a few posters on here as well, we seem to laud the ITK's for their claims ( because of their sources ) then someone called Dreyfus pops up as the main man and nee ****er had a clue beforehand. One mans ITK is another mans bullshitter.

 

I should have been clearer. He was on site before he resigned. But the point is he still influences things even though he’s resigned. Apologies for the confusion.

I’m not particularly upset. I’ve said what I’ve said in good faith.

 

This is madness. I never said every single game under Poyet was ****e. It mostly was though and it did finish that way. He also thought that Bridcutt could play for Real Madrid. But, yeah, we played a good game and we made a move that hit the cross bar when Poyet was manager. I guess we should bring him back, after all.

 

I've been told it's Cowley but hope it's not right.

 

That’s assuming Stefan Shwartz knows all about Paul Cook

 

Do you have anyone down as a bullshitter or are you happy that the lads, who've been posting, are honest?

Did WMS, Mooney, or anyone else ever mention Dreyfus?

Did any of them claim FPP would still be involved?

 

You must have forgotten that we played well at OT and made a good move that we didn't score from when Poyet was manager.

 

He came in with Donald who still owns the club, of course he'd have a voice.

But there's absolutely no evidence to suggest that will continue.

Can I ask, not demand, what has he influenced most since he resigned?

As far as I can see the club has just trundled along aimlessly since then ....


... don't worry about listing them all but could you just give one example of what you're claiming?

 

Satori has been here with the chuckle brothers from day one and I’ve seen little evidence of him wanting to be successful to be honest.

 

Ha ha that was funny

 

Sartori has been a minority shareholder with little power other than a voice. For all we know he's been shouting in the background and ignored.

Things may be different when he's a majority shareholder (or part of)

 

With or without a sporting director? A post earlier said him or Poyet wouldn't work with a sporting director but can't remember which way round it was

 

Appointing the CEO.

 

Hopefully he will have a pivotal role in lifting barriers to the fans.


On match days to let them out of the car park.

 

Agreed, and understand. Time will tell..

 

In terms of what he is influencing since he resigned, can you give examples?

 

Would love the rumour of Schwartz being DOF to have some truth behind it

 

I thought he was on board mainly for when additional finance was needed in the Championship and Premier League campaigns.
Also didn’t he have the minor matter of a presidential campaign?

 

And, do you expect Rodwell to keep his job at Sunderland?

 

I didn't just mean that man, we played some lovely football at times under him.