Off Topic YOUR VOTE COUNTED...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

ON 23rd of June which way are you going to vote?.

  • IN

    Votes: 28 43.8%
  • OUT

    Votes: 34 53.1%
  • DON'T KNOW

    Votes: 4 6.3%

  • Total voters
    64
  • Poll closed .
I prefer not to call them racists, but more like xenophobes. And THIS is exactly what a few of us were saying yesterday on the PL board. There's at least 5% who you could say fall into that bracket, along with the mongs who made the decision without looking at the facts but going on soundbites, and finally those who actually didn't eeven know that the decision was final... yes I kid you not, there are people who did not realise the finite implication of a Leave vote... and are now regretting it ffs!
err you might wish to consider your view of peoples "worth" if you are going to throw terms like "mong" around considering that to a disabled person will be viewed in the same way as a member of our Pakistani community would view "Paki"
 
  • Like
Reactions: FedLadSonOfAnfield
Really Rees-Mogg is a bit like Corbyn useful for the party as a counter balance to the party machine but as leader - no no no.
Well actually yes cos i hate the Tory bastards but as an honest opinion he is a non starter yes he was more honest than most during the referendum debate but he wasn't part of the campaign team A Neal etc were talking to him due to his long standing opposition to the EU.
His biggest problem is the mass of the electorate would look/listen to him and go "he has never been anywhere near a real life" and vote for someone else.
He always reminds me of Redwood when he was a candidate for Tory leader -you are not 100% sure they are fully human they seem a bit artificial in the non emotion sense.

Personally i would prefer that our politics moved that way where there was far more real discussion of the issues rather than this pathetic boo hoo politics followed by the desperate buying of the electorate every 5 years but hold out no great hopes

Yeah I said a bit earlier in thread that he doesn't quite have the set of attributes one would normally associate with a party leader but he does have integrity and speaks very well. He's a politician I've got a lot of time for and did even before the EU referendum stuff.

He's very open about being part of the establishment and not having the same experiences as others less fortunate but he's also very down to earth, listens to people and does his best to be a good MP. There is a video of him somewhere being asked the price of bread and milk etc and he gets them all pretty much correct. He's well worth some YouTube time <laugh>

Although you're right I'm not sure everyone would be able to see past his posh voice and incredible use of the English language.
 
err you might wish to consider your view of peoples "worth" if you are going to throw terms like "mong" around considering that to a disabled person will be viewed in the same way as a member of our Pakistani community would view "Paki"

You know full well that I'm not referring to disabled people. Calling someone paki is quite clearly a derogitory term aimed directly at Pakistanis.
 
You know full well that I'm not referring to disabled people. Calling someone paki is quite clearly a derogitory term aimed directly at Pakistanis.
where the **** do you think the derogatory term "mong" comes from it is in essence identical to "Paki" a shortened version of a normal word which has become an insult .
I have to say on all the boards on this forum it is normal to see disablist language used regularly and no-one blinks an eyelid yet i see no difference from demeaning language aimed at people because of their racial identity
 
where the **** do you think the derogatory term "mong" comes from it is in essence identical to "Paki" a shortened version of a normal word which has become an insult .
I have to say on all the boards on this forum it is normal to see disablist language used regularly and no-one blinks an eyelid yet i see no difference from demeaning language aimed at people because of their racial identity

The difference is that I wasn't aiming it at disabled people was I? Can you think of any common occurence you know where the term paki can be said to someone who isn't pakistani? That's the difference. It can only be used for one purpose or intent.

I was going to say Shut It You Slag, but I was worried you might claim I'm being highly offensive to women lol. Give over Spanish!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peter Saxton
The difference is that I wasn't aiming it at disabled people was I? Can you think of any common occurence you know where the term paki can be said to someone who isn't pakistani? That's the difference. It can only be used for one purpose or intent.

I was going to say Shut It You Slag, but I was worried you might claim I'm being highly offensive to women lol. Give over Spanish!
TBF that is why it became a derogatory name, thick people were calling all "Asian looking" people paki's and still do.
 
The difference is that I wasn't aiming it at disabled people was I? Can you think of any common occurence you know where the term paki can be said to someone who isn't pakistani? That's the difference. It can only be used for one purpose or intent.

I was going to say Shut It You Slag, but I was worried you might claim I'm being highly offensive to women lol. Give over Spanish!
easily
almost anyone from the same region of Asia is likely to be called Paki .
Lets get this straight you thought calling people "mong" was an insult i.e. they were to be considered like people considered people with downs syndrome years ago
so yes i still stand by the "there is no difference"
 
easily
almost anyone from the same region of Asia is likely to be called Paki .
Lets get this straight you thought calling people "mong" was an insult i.e. they were to be considered like people considered people with downs syndrome years ago
so yes i still stand by the "there is no difference"

No I ****ing didn't <laugh> It wasn't even in my thoughts, in fact I'd even forgotten that was where it had originated. I called them mongs because they are bloody clueless morons.

You stand where you like, but I'd get off that high horse if I were you, before you fall off.
 
ok done

**** i hope the season starts soon cos this off season is doing everyone's head in
sooner we can get back to bitching about
managers
players
FIFA
agents
blind linesman
Manc refs

the better

i'm off for a drink some codeine and bit of FIFA
 
Provided we both don't see clueless morons as being synonymous with being disabled, neither of us has anything to worry about.

EDIT: Ok I won't use that term again, let's move on!
Weeell, now you mention it......
Almost all of those words - moron, cretin, imbecile, even idiot and dunce, have their origins in quite specific descriptions of various levels of intellectual disability.
It's a minefield. Just call them a load of pricks - can probably still get away with that one for a while.
 
Weeell, now you mention it......
Almost all of those words - moron, cretin, imbecile, even idiot and dunce, have their origins in quite specific descriptions of various levels of intellectual disability.
It's a minefield. Just call them a load of pricks - can probably still get away with that one for a while.

Isn't imbecile a French word originally.

Why am I even asking this! <laugh>