#YesToHullTigers

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The FRENCH TICKLER said:
Well said. 2517 said NO. 2565 said YES. The rest are not bothered as they did not vote.

I suspect that many of the no voters were not arround during the Fish/Dolan - Hinchcliffe/Buchanan - Lloyd/Wilby years. During those very dark days a name change for what we have now would not have been an issue at all. Some people want it always round.
Click to expand...

Tickles - what does "Some people want it always round" actually mean?
 
originallambrettaman said:
If you seriously believe that, you're an even bigger idiot than I thought you were.

And that would be quite some achievement.
Click to expand...

You may not agree with it, but it seems a logical argument. Other than disagreeing because it doesn't support your stance what is wrong with it as a statement?
 
The FRENCH TICKLER said:
Well said. 2517 said NO. 2565 said YES. The rest are not bothered as they did not vote.

I suspect that many of the no voters were not arround during the Fish/Dolan - Hinchcliffe/Buchanan - Lloyd/Wilby years. During those very dark days a name change for what we have now would not have been an issue at all. Some people want it always round.
Click to expand...

originallambrettaman said:
If you seriously believe that, you're an even bigger idiot than I thought you were.

And that would be quite some achievement.
Click to expand...

TygerTyger said:
You may not agree with it, but it seems a logical argument. Other than disagreeing because it doesn't support your stance what is wrong with it as a statement?
Click to expand...

I'd guess OLM was referring to the highlighted above. Anyone knows it was a loaded pair of questions.
 
I was indeed referring to the loaded ballot results, anyone who thinks that they are an accurate reflection of the fans view of the name change needs their bumps feeling.
 
I've watched and supported us for 54 years.My view is I would support my club if the name changed.Hull is Hull at the end of the day.But hey presto we can always change it back again!!!
 
The FRENCH TICKLER said:
Well said. 2517 said NO. 2565 said YES. The rest are not bothered as they did not vote.

I suspect that many of the no voters were not arround during the Fish/Dolan - Hinchcliffe/Buchanan - Lloyd/Wilby years. During those very dark days a name change for what we have now would not have been an issue at all. Some people want it always round.
Click to expand...

I suspect that very few of the yes voters were around in those days. Those of us who were around then, and in the dire days of the early 80s, had to put up with no end of ridicule because we supported Hull City. Most of us would now like to bask in the glory of what our Hull City are doing now. The name makes no difference to many of the yes brigade. They weren't about in those dark days so the name means less to them. All they want to see is
PL football. They won't be watching Hull Tigers if they were not in the PL unlike the fans who,spent decades watching City in the 3rd and 4th division.
 
boothferryveteran said:
Back our owner, he is the best thing that has happened to to the Club, he has took us a place we could only dream of ..

On Monday night we will fill the KC stadium, the sky camaras will be there, lets show our great chairman we are 100% right behind him

One vision, One Club, One dream, lets join together and make History under the Allam family
Click to expand...

No way sooner he goes the better
 
Castro's Coffin said:
I suspect that very few of the yes voters were around in those days. Those of us who were around then, and in the dire days of the early 80s, had to put up with no end of ridicule because we supported Hull City. Most of us would now like to bask in the glory of what our Hull City are doing now. The name makes no difference to many of the yes brigade. They weren't about in those dark days so the name means less to them. All they want to see is
PL football. They won't be watching Hull Tigers if they were not in the PL unlike the fans who,spent decades watching City in the 3rd and 4th division.
Click to expand...
This is it entirely, also they have the belief that we won't get relegated again with the Allams which is ridiculous, imagine how they would carry on when we do go down, and we will eventually as we are not an established Premiership team.
 
boothferryveteran said:
Im not troll or wum whatever that is, why cant someone support him? After all he has done for the Club, i dont understand why everyone is so against him, i understand he doesnt come across very well, and i can see how he winds people up

Fair enough, i can see both sides to the coin and the things he has said are not great
Click to expand...
Please say this is a wind-up? Are you really this dim?
 
Really poor form from the minority boo boys tonight. Really showed themselves up as classless turds.

But I don't see them as anything to fear, judging by this footage I've managed obtained of the yes to Hull Tigers campaign committee, following the FA's decision...

[video=youtube_share;JN99jshaQbY]http://youtu.be/JN99jshaQbY[/video]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back