You may not agree with it, but it seems a logical argument. Other than disagreeing because it doesn't support your stance what is wrong with it as a statement?
I'd guess OLM was referring to the highlighted above. Anyone knows it was a loaded pair of questions.
I was indeed referring to the loaded ballot results, anyone who thinks that they are an accurate reflection of the fans view of the name change needs their bumps feeling.
I've watched and supported us for 54 years.My view is I would support my club if the name changed.Hull is Hull at the end of the day.But hey presto we can always change it back again!!!
I suspect that very few of the yes voters were around in those days. Those of us who were around then, and in the dire days of the early 80s, had to put up with no end of ridicule because we supported Hull City. Most of us would now like to bask in the glory of what our Hull City are doing now. The name makes no difference to many of the yes brigade. They weren't about in those dark days so the name means less to them. All they want to see is PL football. They won't be watching Hull Tigers if they were not in the PL unlike the fans who,spent decades watching City in the 3rd and 4th division.
Fans booing each other because of the owners actions and most of the ones bowing down to the owner can't see the irony of that
This is it entirely, also they have the belief that we won't get relegated again with the Allams which is ridiculous, imagine how they would carry on when we do go down, and we will eventually as we are not an established Premiership team.
Really poor form from the minority boo boys tonight. Really showed themselves up as classless turds. But I don't see them as anything to fear, judging by this footage I've managed obtained of the yes to Hull Tigers campaign committee, following the FA's decision... [video=youtube_share;JN99jshaQbY]http://youtu.be/JN99jshaQbY[/video]
