Overall we have a good squad, but the ownership have left themselves open to criticism for not investing in a striker.
We need to drill some through balls for Rusyn cos he scored some nice goals for the development team !We have added flexibility to the team which is good. Once again though, the striker situation is a specific area of concern. Getting on 2 years under since we had success in it. It's definitely a weakness and it needs sorting. We love a wide forward. Shame they didn't get one sorted yday, more trying but not closing.
That said, I want them to play Rusyn more anyway. So hopefully he gets the mins. CDM would have been preferred over styles for me, but a flat 3, he can do a job I guess. But CDM and striker were the key positions for me and not sure we have addressed that.
We need to drill some through balls for Rusyn cos he scored some nice goals for the development team !
He is on loan but we have an option to buy at the end of the season. Not sure if he is still out injured.Is that right styles is out for 2 or 3 weeks and he's only on loan?
I’m sure I saw he was available despite having his appendix out, wouldn’t have expected him to slot straight in anyway to be honestHe is on loan but we have an option to buy at the end of the season. Not sure if he is still out injured.
He’s had his appendix out. That’ll usually keep a player out for 4-6 weeks. Not sure when he had the operation like.Is that right styles is out for 2 or 3 weeks and he's only on loan?
it think it all depends on how the see styles he plays CDM for hungry, but that's my biggest worry more then a striker personal opinion i don't think we create a lot for one so getting another striker in, wouldn't guarantee a change in that , but a decent cdm who could play infront of the defence, was really important for me, and if the don't see styles as that i'll be disappointed, but we've also made beale look abit daft, said we need grey hair players and made are team younger again.We have added flexibility to the team which is good. Once again though, the striker situation is a specific area of concern. Getting on 2 years under since we had success in it. It's definitely a weakness and it needs sorting. We love a wide forward. Shame they didn't get one sorted yday, more trying but not closing.
That said, I want them to play Rusyn more anyway. So hopefully he gets the mins. CDM would have been preferred over styles for me, but a flat 3, he can do a job I guess. But CDM and striker were the key positions for me and not sure we have addressed that.
it think it all depends on how the see styles he plays CDM for hungry, but that's my biggest worry more then a striker personal opinion i don't think we create a lot for one so getting another striker in, wouldn't guarantee a change in that , but a decent cdm who could play infront of the defence, was really important for me, and if the don't see styles as that i'll be disappointed, but we've also made beale look abit daft, said we need grey hair players and made are team younger again.
Your points about rusyn are spot on, we have a talented striker (forward) there and he needs games to adapt to league. Last season folk just wanted us to sign any striker, in the summer we signed 3 and loaned 1 so they have tried to do something there.We have added flexibility to the team which is good. Once again though, the striker situation is a specific area of concern. Getting on 2 years under since we had success in it. It's definitely a weakness and it needs sorting. We love a wide forward. Shame they didn't get one sorted yday, more trying but not closing.
That said, I want them to play Rusyn more anyway. So hopefully he gets the mins. CDM would have been preferred over styles for me, but a flat 3, he can do a job I guess. But CDM and striker were the key positions for me and not sure we have addressed that.
Dont really agree with the zero chance aspect, sending players out on loan can fast track their development if done right which then helps them make an impact quicker for usYeah I know. Don't rate Beale but again, we seem to be ignoring the words of the head coach and doubling down on the model. We have signed some players in last few windows that simply have had no impact whatsoever and have been loaned or sinked into the u21,s with no sniff of first team football.
That's my criticism of it all. Mayenda was the best part of a million. Zero chance at first team level. Now loaned out. Benette, zero chance, loaned out. Could even argue Matate, zero chance, loaned out.
Is not that easy to get a striker, who could we have signed who is a proven experienced strikerOverall we have a good squad, but the ownership have left themselves open to criticism for not investing in a striker.
Yeah I know. Don't rate Beale but again, we seem to be ignoring the words of the head coach and doubling down on the model. We have signed some players in last few windows that simply have had no impact whatsoever and have been loaned or sinked into the u21,s with no sniff of first team football.
That's my criticism of it all. Mayenda was the best part of a million. Zero chance at first team level. Now loaned out. Benette, zero chance, loaned out. Could even argue Matate, zero chance, loaned out.
Dont really agree with the zero chance aspect, sending players out on loan can fast track their development if done right which then helps them make an impact quicker for us
Henderson had a good loan at coventry before making an impact for us, pickford n patterson has key loans that really helped them
I think loaning players out is a great thing
We needed more experience and styles def has the experience we were asking for, hjelde has played in the championship n the spl so has played in physical leagues before so we have added a bit of experience to the team
Is it not better to loan these lads out, let them get some experience and come back next season to see if they could challenge? Surely better than kicking their heels in the u21s (on the assumption we signed them for their potential)Yeah I know. Don't rate Beale but again, we seem to be ignoring the words of the head coach and doubling down on the model. We have signed some players in last few windows that simply have had no impact whatsoever and have been loaned or sinked into the u21,s with no sniff of first team football.
That's my criticism of it all. Mayenda was the best part of a million. Zero chance at first team level. Now loaned out. Benette, zero chance, loaned out. Could even argue Matate, zero chance, loaned out.
Is not that easy to get a striker, who could we have signed who is a proven experienced striker
It does of the young lads weve signed are betterJust to be replaced by more young lads who’ve barely kicked a ball. Makes no sense whatsoever.
Mayenda had a handful of minutes and looked ok, but realistically he's not going to start any games between now and end of the season. It has to benefit him and us by playing every week.Loans are great but for me , we are becoming a team that's buying and spending money, to then loan players out. Not improving the immediate first 11 so progress seems to slow or halt. When I say zero chance, I mean zero chance to impress here, in our first 11. I mean Mayenda looked canny, then just loaned out.
Is it not better to loan these lads out, let them get some experience and come back next season to see if they could challenge? Surely better than kicking their heels in the u21s (on the assumption we signed them for their potential)