Winter transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The problem though, if we move O9 into cm then we are leaving ourselves short at cb. If it was up to me, I'd try to sign a good quality cm rather than moving O9 there. He is a better CD than he is a cm. He is much better when the play is in front of him.
With alese, seelt, triantis we wouldn’t be leaving ourselves short. Hume can cover alese at left back and pembele could come in on the right. We aren’t gonna find out if any of the young lads can cut it if we don’t give them the chance
 
I know Langstaffs dad, hes from Stockton on tees where i live and often turns up to watch Stockton town play.

For sentimental reasons id like him to sign, but in reality its hardly a signing of ambition is it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: master-simpson
Exclusive: Sunderland and Derby County interested in signing League Two goal machine

Notts County could now lose top goalscorer Macaulay Langstaff with Sunderland among the EFL clubs to take an interest in the striker.

County will not let Langstaff leave cheaply though, and it is believed they want around £1.5million to let him go – something which few clubs will be able to afford this month https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2024/01/...nterested-in-signing-league-two-goal-machine/
Nads mentioned this guy a few days back. Could be a good signing
 
  • Like
Reactions: FellTop
It seems that so many people look at o9s negatives - lack of height, pace, being rash - but he brings a lot to the team at centre half. His ability to read game is excellent, as is his passing and bringing ball out of.defence. also his tenacity and willingness to put his body on line. We don't concede a lot of goals so I don't know why we are so obsessed with changing a defensive unit that is decent
I agree. The only reason at some points is we need height. 09 has bad games but rarely.
 
I’d like the option of a sitter with 2 8’s think it would get the best of Neil/jobe/ekwah means sacrificing pritch though
I agree with this. Or 3 centre backs in a 3 4 3 but we’d need a lwb for that and as you say it would miss Pritch playing where he does best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hudson92
Exclusive: Sunderland and Derby County interested in signing League Two goal machine

Notts County could now lose top goalscorer Macaulay Langstaff with Sunderland among the EFL clubs to take an interest in the striker.

County will not let Langstaff leave cheaply though, and it is believed they want around £1.5million to let him go – something which few clubs will be able to afford this month https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2024/01/...nterested-in-signing-league-two-goal-machine/
Not convinced this lad will be of Championship standard, watched him a few times and not sure his all round game is good enough for the championship
 
  • Like
Reactions: Young Ted
Not convinced this lad will be of Championship standard, watched him a few times and not sure his all round game is good enough for the championship

I expect it would be hoped that Roberts, Clarke, Pritchard, etc, would provide enough service ...

... I'm sure they'd welcome Hemir/Mayenda on loan as px.

That would benefit us as they'd have the chance to gain experience and come back better players.
 
I expect it would be hoped that Roberts, Clarke, Pritchard, etc, would provide enough service ...

... I'm sure they'd welcome Hemir/Mayenda on loan as px.

That would benefit us as they'd have the chance to gain experience and come back better players.

Is Langstaff better than those 2 though? He’s been playing in the lower leagues for a team that have been favourites for the title 3 years running and create any amounts of chances for him
 
Exactly. I think its because we've borrowed foreign terminology and in some places they traditionally numbered their back four 2, 3, 4, 5 from left to right (or right to left maybe). Obviously we do 3, 5, 6, 2 because it's adapted from the 235/WM

I always thought it was, but not always the flat 442 shape

—1—
2-4-5-3
7-6-8-11
-9-10-
 
  • Like
Reactions: DH4
Exactly. I think its because we've borrowed foreign terminology and in some places they traditionally numbered their back four 2, 3, 4, 5 from left to right (or right to left maybe). Obviously we do 3, 5, 6, 2 because it's adapted from the 235/WM
And then alexander arnold goes and wears number 66!

The idea of using numbers to articulate positions was fine up until we introduced squad numbers. Now it is a bit of a nonsense to be honest. Even back in the old world you had Bryan Robson wearing 7. Mind you I dont recall calling him an 8, but he was the very epitome of a box to box midfielder.
 
I always thought it was, but not always the flat 442 shape

—1—
2-4-5-3
7-6-8-11
-9-10-
I believe it started with the Victorian 235 formation being

1
2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11
Which is was the most common formation when shirt numbers were introduced (or rather that was the way that all teams were drawn on published team sheets when shirt numbers were introduced)
This became in Herbert Chapman's WM
1
2 5 3
4 6
8 10
7 9 11

Which is why some times refer to centre backs as Centre Halfs because the traditional central half back was dropped back between the two full backs.

And then it became
1
2 5 6 3
7 4 8 11
9 10
In the 442. Another half back was dropped back between the full backs and that was the 6.

Edit: bloody numbers haven't come out they way I typed them but you get the idea.
 
I'm glad someone asked about the numbers, I was thinking about the terminology today

1 - Easy...keeper
2 - LB
3 - RB
4 - CD
5 - CD
6 - CDM
7 - ?
8 - box to box midfielder
9 - out and out striker
10 - player behind striker
11 - winger

That about right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DH4