Don't blame them. FA Cup should be their priority.Well they have rested half their team today...
Don't blame them. FA Cup should be their priority.Well they have rested half their team today...
Don't blame them. FA Cup should be their priority.
I think they've earned the right to do what they like.The QF is two weeks away. Seems a little early to be resting players.
Next weekend, fine. But this weekend?
I think they've earned the right to do what they like.

Newcastle 46
Burnley 44
Brighton 43
Palace 42
Saints 38
Cardiff 35
Keeps on getting better for us. Not a good night to be a Cardiff or Burnley fan.
Palace 45
Newcastle 45
Brighton 43
Burnley 41
Saints 38
Cardiff 34
Don’t forget that Bamba will now almost certainly be out for a few games.538's odds have them as a prohibitive favourite for the third spot. Not quite sure I believe that, but they're definitely seeing their path narrow. If they lose to West Ham next week, they will either need to win all of their remaining matches against lower-level opposition or pick up a couple highly unlikely results against good teams. Or have ourselves/Brighton/Burnley absolutely crash and burn.
To avoid losing him on a free transfer in the summer (ie hopefully get a transfer fee for him - although god knows why anyone would want to pay to buy him), City have extended Mangala's contract by 12 months.
Man City's statement includes the wording "Everyone at Manchester City wishes Eliaquim the very best for the remainder of his time here." In other words "Even though you've signed a new contract, we're looking to get rid asap." Hardly a celebration of his extension!
It was probably a club option to extend so Mangala would have had no say.That's a bizarre choice on his part. Being on a free is generally far more rewarding financially, and even if City handed him a rather healthy bonus, it won't recoup what he might have otherwise gotten.
There is one possibility where it would make sense, though: if Mangala and his agent are betting that there won't be significant offers for him even on a free, so at least this way he gets paid City money while being flogged on loan for another year. Which would be kinda hilarious, and also probably not illogical on their part.
It was probably a club option to extend so Mangala would have had no say.
That's a bizarre choice on his part. Being on a free is generally far more rewarding financially, and even if City handed him a rather healthy bonus, it won't recoup what he might have otherwise gotten.
There is one possibility where it would make sense, though: if Mangala and his agent are betting that there won't be significant offers for him even on a free, so at least this way he gets paid City money while being flogged on loan for another year. Which would be kinda hilarious, and also probably not illogical on their part.
Boooo the dream is over. Lloris is the villain.