The Premier League Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I think they've earned the right to do what they like.

Of course they have.

I just think it's a risk to be giving players two and half weeks off, immediately before their biggest game of the season. Obviously you don't want to take on Man Utd with a squad full of injuries, but equally you don't want you players to be caught cold. That's a long break to be giving them.
 
Newcastle 46
Burnley 44
Brighton 43
Palace 42
Saints 38
Cardiff 35

Keeps on getting better for us. Not a good night to be a Cardiff or Burnley fan.

Palace 45
Newcastle 45
Brighton 43
Burnley 41
Saints 38
Cardiff 34
 
Keeps on getting better for us. Not a good night to be a Cardiff or Burnley fan.

Palace 45
Newcastle 45
Brighton 43
Burnley 41
Saints 38
Cardiff 34

538's odds have them as a prohibitive favourite for the third spot. Not quite sure I believe that, but they're definitely seeing their path narrow. If they lose to West Ham next week, they will either need to win all of their remaining matches against lower-level opposition or pick up a couple highly unlikely results against good teams. Or have ourselves/Brighton/Burnley absolutely crash and burn.
 
538's odds have them as a prohibitive favourite for the third spot. Not quite sure I believe that, but they're definitely seeing their path narrow. If they lose to West Ham next week, they will either need to win all of their remaining matches against lower-level opposition or pick up a couple highly unlikely results against good teams. Or have ourselves/Brighton/Burnley absolutely crash and burn.
Don’t forget that Bamba will now almost certainly be out for a few games.

Don’t like seeing anyone injured but should benefit us
 
To avoid losing him on a free transfer in the summer (ie hopefully get a transfer fee for him - although god knows why anyone would want to pay to buy him), City have extended Mangala's contract by 12 months.

Man City's statement includes the wording "Everyone at Manchester City wishes Eliaquim the very best for the remainder of his time here." In other words "Even though you've signed a new contract, we're looking to get rid asap." Hardly a celebration of his extension!
 
To avoid losing him on a free transfer in the summer (ie hopefully get a transfer fee for him - although god knows why anyone would want to pay to buy him), City have extended Mangala's contract by 12 months.

Man City's statement includes the wording "Everyone at Manchester City wishes Eliaquim the very best for the remainder of his time here." In other words "Even though you've signed a new contract, we're looking to get rid asap." Hardly a celebration of his extension!

That's a bizarre choice on his part. Being on a free is generally far more rewarding financially, and even if City handed him a rather healthy bonus, it won't recoup what he might have otherwise gotten.

There is one possibility where it would make sense, though: if Mangala and his agent are betting that there won't be significant offers for him even on a free, so at least this way he gets paid City money while being flogged on loan for another year. Which would be kinda hilarious, and also probably not illogical on their part.
 
That's a bizarre choice on his part. Being on a free is generally far more rewarding financially, and even if City handed him a rather healthy bonus, it won't recoup what he might have otherwise gotten.

There is one possibility where it would make sense, though: if Mangala and his agent are betting that there won't be significant offers for him even on a free, so at least this way he gets paid City money while being flogged on loan for another year. Which would be kinda hilarious, and also probably not illogical on their part.
It was probably a club option to extend so Mangala would have had no say.
 
It was probably a club option to extend so Mangala would have had no say.

Certainly a possibility, but if it's a club option at wages commensurate with what he was earning previous, that creates even less incentive for Mangala to take a deal elsewhere, because he's probably looking at a two-thirds wage cut or more.
 
Granted, they should probably have been down to ten men (second weekend running that the officials haven't helped Cardiff one bit), but Wolves should have put about 5 past Cardiff.

It would appear that Cardiff used up all their remaining defending for the season against us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OddRiverOakWizards
Fulham look gone, but Chelsea might aswell beat them anyway just to make extra sure. None of the other results today are of interest, although If Everton can get something from Liverpool that will be fun.
 
That's a bizarre choice on his part. Being on a free is generally far more rewarding financially, and even if City handed him a rather healthy bonus, it won't recoup what he might have otherwise gotten.

There is one possibility where it would make sense, though: if Mangala and his agent are betting that there won't be significant offers for him even on a free, so at least this way he gets paid City money while being flogged on loan for another year. Which would be kinda hilarious, and also probably not illogical on their part.

I wonder if player's and agent's interests get misaligned here in some way. Particularly as agents are also trying to preserve their own relationship with the club. cc Alex McCarthy, who could have been signing for Chelsea this summer.