The "Mighty Juggernaut" thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoddle is a god
  • Start date Start date
  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
There was no need for the comment apart from to increase tension and pressure. We're not stupid, we knew that Chelsea would want to beat us at Stamford Bridge.

The teams don't like each other so it was always going to be a physical game. However Twattenburg allowed it to descend into a battle.

What a crock of **** <laugh> If Clattenburg got anything wrong it was allowing Spurs to keep 11 players on the pitch. Maybe he should have sent one or two of them off and that might have prevented the game descending into an ugly battle.

You are trying to defend the indefensible.
 
What a crock of **** <laugh> If Clattenburg got anything wrong it was allowing Spurs to keep 11 players on the pitch. Maybe he should have sent one or two of them off and that might have prevented the game descending into an ugly battle.

You are trying to defend the indefensible.

Exactly.
The ref DID allow it to descend in to a battle, but only because he kept the ****ing idiots causing the **** on the pitch when their asses should have been hauled off.
 
That's ridiculous!! Pretty low even by your standard.
Keane admitted that he went to break Haaland's leg!..
So where do you draw the line given that eye gouging is apparently acceptable?

Who gets to decide where the line is drawn? Is it a moveable line depending on how aggrieved/bitter you're feeling at any given moment?

Had Costa gouged Dembele's eye would that have been acceptable because Dembele also wanted to win the game?
 
Seriously NSIS, are you justifying Dembele's eye gouge by saying it's because Hiddink questioned spurs' stomach for the fight?

Listen to yourself.

Manager mind games are all part of the game. Your players took the bait and paid the price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodinki
Seriously NSIS, are you justifying Dembele's eye gouge by saying it's because Hiddink questioned spurs' stomach for the fight?

Listen to yourself.

Manager mind games are all part of the game. Your players took the bait and paid the price.

<laugh>
Exactly, sounds ridiculous when you put it like that doesn't it!
I don't defend Costa, as anyone who has seen my posts on the Chelsea match threads (which is no one, because its a toxic, barren wasteland) can tell you, I am the first to let loose on Costa when he acts the ****. But in this particular game he was pretty restrained for him. He reacted a little when one of the Spurs players nearly tore the shirt off his back, but thats it.

You must log in or register to see images
 
Exactly.
The ref DID allow it to descend in to a battle, but only because he kept the ****ing idiots causing the **** on the pitch when their asses should have been hauled off.

Seeing as the ref missed the eye gouging, the stamp and the off the ball kicking, the FA should step in and charge those players and the club for failing to keep it's players under control and for their manager encroaching onto the field of play. Personally I think Spurs should be docked 3 points :)
 
Seeing as the ref missed the eye gouging, the stamp and the off the ball kicking, the FA should step in and charge those players and the club for failing to keep it's players under control and for their manager encroaching onto the field of play. Personally I think Spurs should be docked 3 points :)
<laugh>
 
So where do you draw the line given that eye gouging is apparently acceptable?

Who gets to decide where the line is drawn? Is it a moveable line depending on how aggrieved/bitter you're feeling at any given moment?

Had Costa gouged Dembele's eye would that have been acceptable because Dembele also wanted to win the game?

Dembele has not admitted that he intended to injure Costa. It looked more like a playground fight. Keane freely admitted that he intended to cripple Haaland.

There lies the big difference!
 
Dembele has not admitted that he intended to injure Costa. It looked more like a playground fight. Keane freely admitted that he intended to cripple Haaland.

There lies the big difference!

You melt!
What other intent is there with an eye gouge? <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Seeing as the ref missed the eye gouging, the stamp and the off the ball kicking, the FA should step in and charge those players and the club for failing to keep it's players under control and for their manager encroaching onto the field of play. Personally I think Spurs should be docked 3 points :)

We know we will get fined, as will Chelsea, for failing to control players. In reality, it's Twattenburg who should get hauled up for letting things get that far.
Whatever other charges are brought, we will have to see.
 
So answer the question.....What else could he possibly have intended to do by sticking his finger in another players eye, other than injure him?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueman
So answer the question.....What else could he possibly have intended to do by sticking his finger in another players eye, other than injure him?

If Costa's head was moving - entirely likely in that sort of situation - then it is feasible that Dembele didn't intend to go for his eyes. As I say, he's not that type of player, but as I've admitted it did look like that. Id be interested to hear what either Costa or Dembele have to say about what happened.
 
Dembele has not admitted that he intended to injure Costa. It looked more like a playground fight. Keane freely admitted that he intended to cripple Haaland.

There lies the big difference!
Keane admitted it several years later in his book.

I look forward to Dembele's autobiography in which he describes how he saw an eyelash in Costa's eye and was simply trying to help him out!
 
If Costa's head was moving - entirely likely in that sort of situation - then it is feasible that Dembele didn't intend to go for his eyes. As I say, he's not that type of player, but as I've admitted it did look like that. Id be interested to hear what either Costa or Dembele have to say about what happened.
You're sounding a bit Scouser about Suarez now fella.

No doubt he loves his family and gives money to charity.
 
Even if he didnt intend to get him in the eye, but he still went for his face, which is a straight red card offence.