Summer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Problem is theres nothing really riding on reserve/B team games. I watch a lot of the youth leagues in England and the quality is really good and they are competitive games but every game is the same - they all just play out from the back. For certain positions thats fine but for defenders or GKs they have to go on loan to lower league teams to get used to different playing styles

I think teams should be restricted with hiw many players they can loan out though as this will hopefully stop the top teams hording the talent

I guess I'm in a minority of one on this matter.:emoticon-0102-bigsm I'm not talking about youth leagues,more about competitive reserve (B) leagues,with promotion and relegation,comprised of teams putting out players who are....a) first team players needing game time following injury recovery,b) squad players needing minutes after spending time on the bench and c) younger players looking to make an impression that they're ready for first team consideration.
Would that not be competitive,beneficial and potentially lucrative?
 
  • Like
Reactions: C Montgomery Burns
I did say a properly constructed,competitive reserve league.....ok, a B team league....and there's no reason why it wouldn't be as competitive as English lower leagues 1 and 2.

I can't see any reason it would be anywhere near as competitive as League One / Two? Everyone in it would know the games were effectively meaningless, who would care about a reserve league? It would be nothing like L1/2 imo
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robertson
I can't see any reason it would be anywhere near as competitive as League One / Two? Everyone in it would know the games were effectively meaningless, who would care about a reserve league? It would be nothing like L1/2 imo

It's all about opinions mate.
Btw,can't you change your avatar.....I know you're probably a really nice lad,but,I ****ing hate looking at you!!:emoticon-0102-bigsm :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
Am I being dim here? I don’t think there’s anything in this but usually this sort of tweet (I think he is/was an InsideFootball ‘journo’) have our fans in a flap. I’ve seen no mention of it though - I got it from the Stoke forum.

You must log in or register to see media
"
Possibly one of the worst tweets I've ever seen and that's saying something.
 
Not a fecking chance.:emoticon-0136-giggl:emoticon-0136-giggl:emoticon-0136-giggl
I could see him being a useful squad player but not at anywhere near that price, maybe 200k. I can see us moving for an experienced striker though, even in terms of setting standards etc in training and mentality. We have this is midfield and defence, with the likes of Evans and Batth.
 
I guess I'm in a minority of one on this matter.:emoticon-0102-bigsm I'm not talking about youth leagues,more about competitive reserve (B) leagues,with promotion and relegation,comprised of teams putting out players who are....a) first team players needing game time following injury recovery,b) squad players needing minutes after spending time on the bench and c) younger players looking to make an impression that they're ready for first team consideration.
Would that not be competitive,beneficial and potentially lucrative?
Thats effectively what the u21 league is, they have promotions n relegations but its not a priority for them

For example if a team gets relegated out of L2 then folk at the club lose their jobs due to decrease in money - that adds extra pressure on the players, you cant replicate that with B leagues.

I do get your point but think the days of competitive reserve leagues are done
 
Everton (Simms), Union Berlin (Dajaku), PSG (Michut), and potentially Arsenal and whoever buys Ballard. TBD: Leeds (Gelhardt and Huggins)

Strange you forgot Amid Diallo.

Anyway the loan players weren't ours.
As said by other posters, if Ballard goes we'll get a good fee and reinvest.
The good news is that the recruitment team aren't gannin anywhere so we will be OK.
Trust them as they seem to know what they are doing
 
Thats effectively what the u21 league is, they have promotions n relegations but its not a priority for them

For example if a team gets relegated out of L2 then folk at the club lose their jobs due to decrease in money - that adds extra pressure on the players, you cant replicate that with B leagues.

I do get your point but think the days of competitive reserve leagues are done

Good point marra....I'll bow to your judgement.... was thinking it might benefit those in the lower end of it.
I've kind of suspended my thoughts of it now,I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scout73
Another one signed their first pro contract...

You must log in or register to see media
I really like the look of this lad, he was a big miss for the u18s at the end of the season

Sounds very impressive:


The 18-year-old winger has made 43 appearances across various age groups within the Academy, scoring nine goals and claiming eight assists. He has also made six Premier League 2 appearances along with two games in the FA Youth Cup.

He was part of the side that saw the Under-18's finish as runners-up in the Under-18's Premier League North, narrowly missing out on the title to Manchester City.

Academy Manager Robin Nicholls said: "Ethan’s final season as a scholar saw him make significant contributions to a U18 team that finished 2nd in the U18 Premier League North. Although injury curtailed the season early for him, the pace and power that he displayed for the majority of the campaign leaves us excited about the potential pathway for him here at the club. We are delighted that he has signed his first professional contract here at SAFC."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.