Summer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Mackem 10.1 said:
Because he's a good player, and a 1 of the most experienced players in our side
Click to expand...

Who isn't a centre back and got absolutely whooped for both goals today with letting strikes the wrong side of him.

Sorry like but the proof is in the pudding and today shown clearly that dropping our most experience and player of the season in Danny was a mistake.

Simple to understand
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wes, Young Ted, Ffffffftttttmmmmm and 2 others
Prehab26 said:
Who isn't a centre back and got absolutely whooped for both goals today with letting strikes the wrong side of him.

Sorry like but the proof is in the pudding and today shown clearly that dropping our most experience and player of the season in Danny was a mistake.

Simple to understand
Click to expand...
The first goal wasn't his fault, it was a fluke goal. The 2nd was his fault, but he also bailed us out a couple of times when caught on the break. We have lost a game and as per usual someone is always made out to be the fall guy
 
  • Like
Reactions: safc-noggieland, Dorset, safcfansofaraway and 7 others
Mackem 10.1 said:
The first goal wasn't his fault, it was a fluke goal. The 2nd was his fault, but he also bailed us out a couple of times when caught on the break. We have lost a game and as per usual someone is always made out to be the fall guy
Click to expand...

It was. He let broadhead drift past him while being on his heels.

09 was poor all game. Don't know a single person who believes he wasn't. As usual , you only seem to quote my posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wes, Young Ted, Ffffffftttttmmmmm and 1 other person
Prehab26 said:
It was. He let broadhead drift past him while being on his heels.

09 was poor all game. Don't know a single person who believes he wasn't. As usual , you only seem to quote my posts.
Click to expand...
I quote on many people's posts, very strange comment. Sorry but that first goal is a fluke, broadhead is just running into the box and the cross shot hits him in the knee, nothing to do with defending, it was a fluke goal. Like I say the 2nd was his fault as he was caught in 2 minds and it cost us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NC Sanddancer
Prehab26 said:
Who isn't a centre back and got absolutely whooped for both goals today with letting strikes the wrong side of him.

Sorry like but the proof is in the pudding and today shown clearly that dropping our most experience and player of the season in Danny was a mistake.

Simple to understand
Click to expand...
I also agree on batth, he is out best defender, not sure what is going on there
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prehab26
Prehab26 said:
Who isn't a centre back and got absolutely whooped for both goals today with letting strikes the wrong side of him.

Sorry like but the proof is in the pudding and today shown clearly that dropping our most experience and player of the season in Danny was a mistake.

Simple to understand
Click to expand...

Vast exaggeration here like, what about Ekwah bottling an aireal challenge and then Neil heading it straight to Davis for the first?
Second goal granted but it was still a quality pass and finish. After Batths performance at Hartlepool the other night I have no confidence he makes a difference on either goal there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: safcfansofaraway, NC Sanddancer, Sunderland06 and 1 other person
LFT said:
Vast exaggeration here like, what about Ekwah bottling an aireal challenge and then Neil heading it straight to Davis for the first?
Second goal granted but it was still a quality pass and finish. After Batths performance at Hartlepool the other night I have no confidence he makes a difference on either goal there.
Click to expand...

Surely you're not writing off the player of the season due to that Hartlepool game? Where we have 8 or so players who were playing out of position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf
Prehab26 said:
It was. He let broadhead drift past him while being on his heels.

09 was poor all game. Don't know a single person who believes he wasn't. As usual , you only seem to quote my posts.
Click to expand...
Totally agree o9 was poor today, I find that o9 and Gooch are very similar players in that respect. Yes they do give their all and wear their hearts on their sleeves but generally once they stop doing the easy pass etc they become confused with what they can do next. In the 1st half o9 brought the ball out of defence only to lose it and then he was out of postition. Gooch is the same, when he goes down the line his head goes down and genrally there is only one outcome, if we're lucky we'll get a cross or it may go out for a throw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jpdsafc and Prehab26
Blaming O’Nein for the first goal is bloody harsh mind, massive deflection otherwise Patterson would have had it covered.

He also cleared one off the line which would have been a certain goal. I get that he has his pros and cons but thought he was ok today. Baath wouldn’t have made a difference for either of the goals.

After a defeat people will be pointing fingers at players. Had we been better up front we would have won today.

We should be questioning why it took so long to show some fight, and that’s the team as a whole not individuals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dorset, Gordon Armstrong, NC Sanddancer and 2 others
Daz said:
Blaming O’Nein for the first goal is bloody harsh mind, massive deflection otherwise Patterson would have had it covered.

He also cleared one off the line which would have been a certain goal. I get that he has his pros and cons but thought he was ok today. Baath wouldn’t have made a difference for either of the goals.

After a defeat people will be pointing fingers at players. Had we been better up front we would have won today.

We should be questioning why it took so long to show some fight, and that’s the team as a whole not individuals.
Click to expand...
The goal was harsh, yes. But his man-marking was not good. He was about 2-3 feet away from his man.
 
Daz said:
Blaming O’Nein for the first goal is bloody harsh mind, massive deflection otherwise Patterson would have had it covered.

He also cleared one off the line which would have been a certain goal. I get that he has his pros and cons but thought he was ok today. Baath wouldn’t have made a difference for either of the goals.

After a defeat people will be pointing fingers at players. Had we been better up front we would have won today.

We should be questioning why it took so long to show some fight, and that’s the team as a whole not individuals.
Click to expand...
I didnt think o9 was that good today but i do agree that i dont think batth would have done any better

I love batth but hes better against big physical strikers, broadhead n chaplin would have enjoyed running at batth
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dorset, Milton Nunez's Thong, Riever and 3 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back