Summer '24 transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Was thinking exactly this this morning.

My preferred midfield three would be Neil sitting with Rigg and Browne in front. No number 10.

Then if a number 10 is needed, AA is the best option.

Jobe and Ekwah would be backups for the 8 position.

As you say, will be interesting to see how much his game time drops (or not).
I like jobe but it really grated on me how he just seemed to start all the time, a minutes clause will defo be in place if he keeps starting every game for me.

He slows the attack down all the time when we try to counter or get up the pitch fast
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Professor
I like jobe but it really grated on me how he just seemed to start all the time, a minutes clause will defo be in place if he keeps starting every game for me.

He slows the attack down all the time when we try to counter or get up the pitch fast

I don't think he'll have a clause in his contract about number of minutes etc, but I can definitely see that there was a "gentleman's agreement" about it.
 
Random thought but i really don't think Jobe gets in this squad for me. Browne, Rigg, Neil / Browne, Neil, AA / Neil, AA, Rigg maybe even ekwah are a better 3 man midfield than any ones where jobe is in and we should hopefully have an experienced striker come in too. Gonna be a weird one, if he keeps starting all the time surely there is a minutes clause

Jobe will be starting because his value is rocketing and he’s probably our most valuable asset moving forward for reasons not solely related to his performance. If we don’t give him much game time this season or he’s an impact sub then nobody will be wanting to shell out £25m+ for him.
 
I like jobe but it really grated on me how he just seemed to start all the time, a minutes clause will defo be in place if he keeps starting every game for me.

He slows the attack down all the time when we try to counter or get up the pitch fast
He started all the time because he was our 2nd biggest goal threat last season along with being one of our better ball carriers and his ability to receive the ball in high areas. Suggesting a player who's being linked with £20m+ moves is only starting for a championship side because of a minutes clause is conspiracy theory bullshit
 
I remember when we signed Quinn, he had a bad run with injuries, there was one game at The Sol after his come back, he missed a sitter, v Norwich I think, I was in the pub with afterwards (The Avenue, whatever it was called back then) and one of the lads I was out shouted "Lads, this daft ****er thinks Quinn is a good player" I did say if we gave him the service he would prove it, players need the right service, I am rambling, maybe the penny will drop with Hemir, he did seem more aggressive on his last outing, good luck to the lad

i think a lot had my 'impression' of quinny as the most we had to watch back then were MotD or shoot highlights but some of the stuff i saw him do on the pitch were amazing...i remember saying to my nephew 'if that philips lad learns to read quinns knock downs he could grab a few goals'
 
Last edited:
Just because some fans have other preferences for who should be playing doesn’t mean there’s a ‘minutes clause’ or ‘gentleman’s agreement’ for Jobe.

Maybe it’s just that the coaches and/or the club see it differently. Based on their minutes in Spain Jobe looked a more accomplished player than Browne (I know it’s an unfair comparison, I’m being slightly flippant) and there’s no Prem clubs hovering around with fees close to £15m-£20m for Aouchiche…
 
He started all the time because he was our 2nd biggest goal threat last season along with being one of our better ball carriers and his ability to receive the ball in high areas. Suggesting a player who's being linked with £20m+ moves is only starting for a championship side because of a minutes clause is conspiracy theory bullshit
Jobe will be starting because his value is rocketing and he’s probably our most valuable asset moving forward for reasons not solely related to his performance. If we don’t give him much game time this season or he’s an impact sub then nobody will be wanting to shell out £25m+ for him.
You’ve both put it much better than me!
 
He started all the time because he was our 2nd biggest goal threat last season along with being one of our better ball carriers and his ability to receive the ball in high areas. Suggesting a player who's being linked with £20m+ moves is only starting for a championship side because of a minutes clause is conspiracy theory bullshit
Don't agree, I personally think he slowed down the team's attacks constantly and there was a very long run where he was constantly letting games pass him by where some were even saying he looked knackered but wasn't dropped once. His brother Jude asked for the same thing at Man Utd when he was close to going there - maybe there isn't a minutes clause but I can't honestly say during that big run where he looked shattered that he was starting because he was performing well
 
Just because some fans have other preferences for who should be playing doesn’t mean there’s a ‘minutes clause’ or ‘gentleman’s agreement’ for Jobe.

Maybe it’s just that the coaches and/or the club see it differently. Based on their minutes in Spain Jobe looked a more accomplished player than Browne (I know it’s an unfair comparison, I’m being slightly flippant) and there’s no Prem clubs hovering around with fees close to £15m-£20m for Aouchiche…
Aouchiche, if given a run, would make us way more dangerous IMO, he actively gets up the pitch a lot faster and looking at games under le bris so far, the transitions are a lot faster with him in the team. I still like jobe like I say but there was a big run where I think him in midfield wasn't working, upfront on the other hand, I do like him there
 
Not really. I do have a soft spot for the lads who come through our place but realistically he would likely be be behind Hemir, Mayenda, Rusyn and, if he comes in, Mendy. He did okay at Burton but didn't pull up any trees, from what I can see, his level is probably League One at this moment in time.

Agree with this, Mendy and a loan similar to Stansfield would be ideal I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pure River Slut
I still want Tom Cannon and I'm amazed there seems to be no buzz about him from anywhere at the moment. Is he injured?
he has been playing pre-season at Leicester not sure if he's going on loan

- Nonetheless, the £6m recruit from Everton a year ago has a decent pedigree, and it seems new Foxes boss Steve Cooper wants to see what the 21-year-old Irishman can do before deciding if a loan is the best option in his development, according to The Telegraph.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Southern A
Aouchiche, if given a run, would make us way more dangerous IMO, he actively gets up the pitch a lot faster and looking at games under le bris so far, the transitions are a lot faster with him in the team. I still like jobe like I say but there was a big run where I think him in midfield wasn't working, upfront on the other hand, I do like him there

It’s not that I don’t agree mate I think AA looks a player and deserves a chance in the 10 role - I’ve said for a while I don’t think Jobe is a 9 nor is he a 10 he looks perfectly suited to be an 8 or even a 6. Big enforcer type in the middle of the pitch. But as of now he’s just came off the back of a decent season and is a valuable asset so they’ll play him. This is the problem when you’re trying to develop young lads all battling for the same position
 
Don't agree, I personally think he slowed down the team's attacks constantly and there was a very long run where he was constantly letting games pass him by where some were even saying he looked knackered but wasn't dropped once. His brother Jude asked for the same thing at Man Utd when he was close to going there - maybe there isn't a minutes clause but I can't honestly say during that big run where he looked shattered that he was starting because he was performing well
I mean the data agrees with me so i'll go with that.
 
he has been playing pre-season at Leicester not sure if he's going on loan

- Nonetheless, the £6m recruit from Everton a year ago has a decent pedigree, and it seems new Foxes boss Steve Cooper wants to see what the 21-year-old Irishman can do before deciding if a loan is the best option in his development, according to The Telegraph.

Yeh it seems he could be an odd case of barely getting in the team in the championship to playing regularly after promotion. I guess similar to Dan Neil on our promotion from league one
 
On the minutes clause thing for Jobe - as I've said I doubt its in his contract. But what I do remember is a Birmingham ITK putting on twitter (before he came to us), that one of the reasons he was looking to leave was that the club promised his Dad that he'd start X number of games when he signed his pro deal, but that he hadn't been ready so they hadn't, so they decided to take him elsewhere.

It was also rumoured that the Dad was asking for similar for Jude when he made the move from Birmingham.

So I absolutely would not be surprised if Speakman as part of the transaction to bring Jobe here, made such a promise.

Now, whether the data is there to back up that Jobe deserved to start is another matter. He probably did.

What will be interesting NOW is that Rigg is probably moving ahead of him in the pecking order, and is a Sunderland product. So if and how Jobe's minutes decrease will be interesting, as I'd say its pretty likely he will have reduced playing time this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CR17
Aouchiche, if given a run, would make us way more dangerous IMO, he actively gets up the pitch a lot faster and looking at games under le bris so far, the transitions are a lot faster with him in the team. I still like jobe like I say but there was a big run where I think him in midfield wasn't working, upfront on the other hand, I do like him there
That's fine, you're entirely entitled to that opinion but it's the accusations of favourable treatment or contract clauses that put the player's interests ahead of the club's that bother me.

A lot of our fans (not necessarily including you in this) have a weird issue with Jobe and his family, he became a scapegoat last year for many and it was unjustified in my opinion and largely driven by conspiracy theory based agendas.
 
That's fine, you're entirely entitled to that opinion but it's the accusations of favourable treatment or contract clauses that put the player's interests ahead of the club's that bother me.

A lot of our fans (not necessarily including you in this) have a weird issue with Jobe and his family, he became a scapegoat last year for many and it was unjustified in my opinion and largely driven by conspiracy theory based agendas.
yeah for sure, I'm not trying to bring him down or come up with some weird conspiracy I just do think naturally given our options now and rigg's breakthrough I naturally ee jobe's play time decreasing and if it doesn't I'll be quite surprised