Are we signing any full backs yet?
Maybe we'll play Ali, Longman, Williams as wingbacks as well as Coyle, Fleming and Elder depending on the opposition?
Though there are 3 or 4 more incoming and there's still a month in the window.
Are we signing any full backs yet?
Can't have too many ... keepersWill be interesting having a glut of keepers for once.
Just confused at what that means for Ingram and Cartwright. Other positions I understand as you can get minutes off the bench to develop, but it seems odd with keepers. I can't remember the last time we owned three young keepers which we could if/when we make Baxter permanent.
Why Ingram?
Who says we'll take up the option on Baxter?
We might let Harvey go out on load again or could seek him?
Robson isn't good enough to contend yet..
You just jump to wild conclusions for no apparent reason sometimes
Turner was sold because City had a huge income tax demand which needed paying. Bartlett couldn't lay his hands on any ready cash so Turner was hawked around and it was Sunderland who came up with the readies, in cash, and the tax demand was paid.Reminds me of when we shipped Michael Turner off to Sunderland, he could have done better just as Greaves is better than Boro.
Playing 6 wingbacks would be too many imoMaybe we'll play Ali, Longman, Williams as wingbacks as well as Coyle, Fleming and Elder depending on the opposition?
Though there are 3 or 4 more incoming and there's still a month in the window.
Playing 6 wingbacks would be too many imo
Can't think of many that have three competing for a starting spot, can you name some examples?
Are you having a go? Just want to clarify..
I'm asking about the fact we'd have four senior keepers in the summer as we have an option on Baxter. It's a simple question. Why the overreaction?
The limit has only just been reduced.
Right, thought there was something not right about it.Turner was sold because City had a huge income tax demand which needed paying. Bartlett couldn't lay his hands on any ready cash so Turner was hawked around and it was Sunderland who came up with the readies, in cash, and the tax demand was paid.
I'm not sure the club will not be looking at Cadbury Baxter and thinking twice about spending cash when they have an able deputy or deputies and a young international keeper out on loan... As for Jacob G... where are you going to find another. ?... his biggest selling asset is that he has a left peg!!From the noises Acun has made, I think we'll be signing Baxter. We might not if his injuries keep up, but I can see us easily signing him. If he stays fit, I can't see anybody else being number 1 this season. Great to have two fantastic senior keepers though.
I'm not sure the club will not be looking at Cadbury Baxter and thinking twice about spending cash when they have an able deputy or deputies and a young international keeper out on loan... As for Jacob G... where are you going to find another. ?... his biggest selling asset is that he has a left peg!!
The midfielder Molby signed. Was it Richie Appleby?Trying to think who our worst sick note culprits have been the name Bullard comes to mind
He'll be in the first team, like Ingram and Baxter he'll have to convince the staff he can cut it. But a three year deal with an option suggests a lot of potential.
Alton Thelwell was pretty injury prone.Trying to think who our worst sick note culprits have been the name Bullard comes to mind