Transfer Rumours Summer 2024 transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Well we can, it’s like Spurs signing Guehi instead of Greaves or someone of that ilk, track record of performing in the division vs a bit more of a gamble.

My point is that you can’t just level the fact he’s only played in league 1. In the same ilk greaves has only ever played championship football and looks miles above it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nikica Jellyfish
Not sure why Philo is getting some bad press on here. Football is a short career. A top player can last for say 15 years, 16 tops...Unless your name is Ronaldo...Make hay while the sun shines...When the sun goes down and its gone you don't want to look back and say if only I'd taken this or that opportunity. If you get the chance you take the opportunities...The one club man is very rare, unless you play for say a Citeh (e.g. Foden) or a Real Madrid, when it doesn't make sense to move on. Therefore I can't see City stopping any player who wants to go, as long as the deal is good for the club.
 
Not sure why Philo is getting some bad press on here. Football is a short career. A top player can last for say 15 years, 16 tops...Unless your name is Ronaldo...Make hay while the sun shines...When the sun goes down and its gone you don't want to look back and say if only I'd taken this or that opportunity. If you get the chance you take the opportunities...The one club man is very rare, unless you play for say a Citeh (e.g. Foden) or a Real Madrid, when it doesn't make sense to move on. Therefore I can't see City stopping any player who wants to go, as long as the deal is good for the club.

I don't think he is getting any "bad press" , most people understand that players want to play at the highest level they can
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I can see the comparison between Grosicki and Philogene.

It’s easy to look too much into things but his body language just suggested he saw us as a stepping stone and nothing more. I can’t fault his talent or even his work-rate tracking back but it all seemed like he was playing for himself, not the team or club as a collective.

Philogene strikes me as the sort of player who would be more happy if he got a goal and an assist in a 3-2 loss than getting no goals or assists in a 1-0 win. Reminds me of Ronaldo hogging free-kicks from ridiculous angles against Slovenia rather than letting someone else whip a ball into the box.

To be fair Acun would prefer that too.
 
I'm pretty concerned we're supposedly signing a striker next week but there's not much noise about any other signings. We need an avalanche of signings at this point but everything seems to be moving at a snail's pace. We need players in and getting up to speed with Walter's style.

I'd be very surprised if we signed a striker next week.
 

Not sure what you're asking me. Last I heard about Ohio was someone said he's signing for some European club for £1.5m.

I just don't think we'll be unveiling a signing in the next week when there's no sign of one being close now. Usually it's several days or even weeks after the point at which we find out about a signing being close that we actually complete the signing.
 
Ok ok, I guessed I missed some latest news, I thought Ohio was the one Acun mentioned as someone familiar as a striker.
 
Not sure what you're asking me. Last I heard about Ohio was someone said he's signing for some European club for £1.5m.

I just don't think we'll be unveiling a signing in the next week when there's no sign of one being close now. Usually it's several days or even weeks after the point at which we find out about a signing being close that we actually complete the signing.

Acun said we would be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
Not sure what you're asking me. Last I heard about Ohio was someone said he's signing for some European club for £1.5m.

I just don't think we'll be unveiling a signing in the next week when there's no sign of one being close now. Usually it's several days or even weeks after the point at which we find out about a signing being close that we actually complete the signing.
We can't announce Harry kane until after england get beat tomorrow
 
This Giles deal seems a bit foggy to me, from what I interpreted from FFP conversations on here, internet info & in real life, it appears teams can spend X & spread it across the length of the contract, but selling a player is immediately in club accounts & ready to spend, even though buying team is spreading the payments over the length of the contract.
It seems to be happening a lot with teams at the moment & looks a dodgy way to work round FFP.
Cameron Archer was transferred to Sheff Utd for £19 million, yet they get relegated & Villa “forced” to buy him back for £19 million.
Therefore, technically loaning him out for a year for £19 million & then buying him back for, let’s say a 4 year deal, £4.25 million a year.
Is this how things are working now?
So Giles cost £1 million a year & we sell for £4 million now, but getting paid the same £1 million a year?
 
This Giles deal seems a bit foggy to me, from what I interpreted from FFP conversations on here, internet info & in real life, it appears teams can spend X & spread it across the length of the contract, but selling a player is immediately in club accounts & ready to spend, even though buying team is spreading the payments over the length of the contract.
It seems to be happening a lot with teams at the moment & looks a dodgy way to work round FFP.
Cameron Archer was transferred to Sheff Utd for £19 million, yet they get relegated & Villa “forced” to buy him back for £19 million.
Therefore, technically loaning him out for a year for £19 million & then buying him back for, let’s say a 4 year deal, £4.25 million a year.
Is this how things are working now?
So Giles cost £1 million a year & we sell for £4 million now, but getting paid the same £1 million a year?

No Giles cost hits all this year if we sell him.
 
from what I interpreted from FFP conversations on here, internet info & in real life, it appears teams can spend X & spread it across the length of the contract, but selling a player is immediately in club accounts & ready to spend, even though buying team is spreading the payments over the length of the contract.
It seems to be happening a lot with teams at the moment & looks a dodgy way to work round FFP.

I wouldn't believe everything I read in these forums either.