Transfer Rumours Summer 2020 Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Geo10 said:
Yes, why what have I missed
Click to expand...
Lichaj was happy to sign an extension with a clause voiding the contract if we went down. They would not have been obligated to pay Lichaj in the event of relegation.

They wanted him to accept a 50% cut to sign a 1-year extension which reneges on the terms THEY put in his contract in their favour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: highpeak tiger
£17k to £20k a week for a bang average player it makes your eyes water. Plus he would have received a nice signing on fee. Good work Darnborough.
I am glad I am not paying his monthly salary. He will be lucky to get half of that next season.
 
785mae said:
£17k to £20k a week for a bang average player it makes your eyes water. Plus he would have received a nice signing on fee. Good work Darnborough.
I am glad I am not paying his monthly salary. He will be lucky to get half of that next season.
Click to expand...

Who are you talking about? Stewart?
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
Lichaj was happy to sign an extension with a clause voiding the contract if we went down. They would not have been obligated to pay Lichaj in the event of relegation.

They wanted him to accept a 50% cut to sign a 1-year extension which reneges on the terms THEY put in his contract in their favour.
Click to expand...
Yes but it was only an option, they’ve obviously decided they don’t think he’s worth his current salary. As we all know they’ll be looking for a younger, cheaper player with a sell on fee.
 
highpeak tiger said:
I think you are an Allam apologist, in my eyes they are quite simply indefensible.
Click to expand...
So we should give a bang average player a contract because we put the option in 2 years ago or whenever it was. I’d rather give his wage to keep stewart. At least he’s carried on playing to help the club stay up.
I think most would agree I’m far from an Allam apologist
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howden Tigress, Howdentiger2 and GLP
I haven't been to a live City match since Bruce left. I'm boycotting, you see,because I despise the Allams, although i remain an avid City fan. When they leave or die, I shall return. For a "far from an Allam apologist" you sure make a lot of excuses for them.
 
highpeak tiger said:
I haven't been to a live City match since Bruce left. I'm boycotting, you see,because I despise the Allams, although i remain an avid City fan. When they leave or die, I shall return. For a "far from an Allam apologist" you sure make a lot of excuses for them.
Click to expand...
Tell me them....
 
Geo10 said:
Yes but it was only an option, they’ve obviously decided they don’t think he’s worth his current salary. As we all know they’ll be looking for a younger, cheaper player with a sell on fee.
Click to expand...
They will be looking for that.

my opinion is that it’s a shame they didn’t agree to his offer of another year which could be cancelled FOC if we went down.
If we stayed up he’d have had a reasonable contract, but hey...we’d have stayed up so suck it up, it would have only been for a year.
If we’d have gone down then no loss
 
  • Like
Reactions: look_back_in_amber
dennisboothstash said:
They will be looking for that.

my opinion is that it’s a shame they didn’t agree to his offer of another year which could be cancelled FOC if we went down.
If we stayed up he’d have had a reasonable contract, but hey...we’d have stayed up so suck it up, it would have only been for a year.
If we’d have gone down then no loss
Click to expand...
Would he have stayed on the same salary he’d currently on had we stayed up
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back