Why would AP be squirming? Even if all the Allam's have alleged is true then absolutely none of it would be AP's fault.
It's always about AP though isn't it. These guys detest the idea of a popular owner that isn't the Allams so they pretend to find issues with AP all the time. Allegiance to the Allams is like a ****ing religion to those three.
Its not impossible but its extremely unlikely. Firstly the vast majority of people in the stadium couldn't give a ****, however lets say a tiny minority do, of this handful of people how many care enough to shout abuse at someone who had nothing to do with the sacking? You could probably count them on one hand. Now consider where the groundsman work and how far it is from the stands. Its all just a bit implausible and as its come from the mouth of a compulsive liar its even more dubious.
Can you give us some evidence that 'these guys detest the idea of a popular owner that isn't the Allams so they pretend to find issues.....' ? Or is it something else you have made up ?
Just in the name of accuracy, PLT doesn't moderate of this board and hasn't done for a long time, the supermods just keep forgetting to remove his title. You're on very dodgy ground accusing anyone on this thread of bias.
This 'abuse' of the new groundsmen consists of some mild piss-taking one of them got on Twitter after posting claims about the penalty spots actually being there. Anyone who thought they were abused on the pitch last Saturday is just a little bit daft.
He's an ironic parody of himself now. Part funny (in a laughing at not with manner) and part just really ****ing tedious.
They're a bitter little set PLT They'd rather be steadfastly and deliberately contradictory than try to have an opinion that maybe Ehab is wrong. You wouldn't change their mindset even if Ehab was caught murdering somebody in cold blood . He'd still be innocent. Save your breath.
So there was some abuse then ? on the subject of being a bit daft I think you should have a word with your fellow mod, PMT. He was claiming earlier that is was a '****ing stupid suggestion' that the new grounds staff had received abuse at the KC then he followed that up saying that he thought it 'was a ridiculous claim'. Obviously wrong then ?
OLM has already told you in post 725 that PLT doesn't moderate on this board and hasn't done for a long while. Do pay attention you tedious ****.
I've had people in my teams working two jobs, with my agreement. However, I made sure it didn't interfere with the work they did for me. I also made sure we had buy in to what was happening. Same as when you give someone permission to finish early or take a day working from home to help with the family situation you just make sure it's all documented for everyone's sake. Of course they do. I've done it myself when I was younger and needed extra money but I didn't do one while I was being paid to do the other. @both: It might of all been above board I honestly don't know but, to me at least its all a little bit muddy. I'm sure many will disagree with me but I just thought I'd express my opinion.
They may have had a gentlemen's agreement which worked in the past, but many have learnt that when dealing with the Allams they do have their own way of interpreting things. The bit in bold, I have never documented anyone working for me going home early or starting a bit late, and I am fairly sure my employers both large and small never did.
Yep you could be right. Really. I'd ask them to send me an email and respond just in case some twat tried to screw them.
Please direct me to the mild piss taking. Thanks. i never said it was. I meant Ap wouldn't want to be dragged into this. Don't you think it likely they will be calling on some FC staff to say what the groundsman did? Do you think AP wants to be involved in that. Will he be finding out for himself what this bloke did as a kit man and why they needed him. Do you think, knowing the Allams, they might look at suing FC for the time he was working for them and not doing his job as a groundsman. If I was AP I'd be finding out what and when he was working. If the kit men lie to him do you think he might look at sacking them. It's sad and a bit disturbing you only read things one way. If I came on her and said Ehab had raped twenty babies. You would agree and say he did it as he does stuff like this look at the concessions. You're a bit disturbed.
