Serious takeover talk

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
He's made his fair share of poor decisions already, they outweigh the good ones that's for sure. The best decision he can make now is to pass the club onto someone that is able to run a club of our size.
And that is hopefully what the takeover / investment will be
 
Investment sounds like he'll still be here. The man isn't fit or experienced enough to run us. Massively need to be taken over and him shown the door.
Investment also could mean he will have others to answer to as well, it could be a win win for us
 
And that is hopefully what the takeover / investment will be
I think if the takeover/investment meant the departure of donald he would be gone by now or saying it was off.
Somehow I think he is here till the end of the season at least
 
I'm just browsing more at the moment and reading stuff and I may not believe some of the stuff you say but it's easily ignored here by skip reading. However the direct comments at you regarding austitism, paranoia and even starting a thread directed at you were ****ing pathetic! :emoticon-0114-dull:


RTG is already a better place now as it seems a few posters are either banned or thinking before posting. I've just come on here this morning to catch up and you would have thought it was RTG from months ago :emoticon-0138-think:emoticon-0136-giggl

I appreciate this comment a lot mate. I tried PM'ing the fella this morning to try and understand what made him feel like all that was justified. I don't think I've been anything but civil, it's a forum, so I'm going to keep speaking my mind and those that disagree have every right to. They also have every right to ask me to show working out or question my beliefs about it. I'll answer in kind, but if someone calls me paranoid and autistic, they step over a line and that is not ok.

I'll leave it now.
 
I may be wrong but isnt mackem x talking about the spat between owls feller and kitmit?
Aye I was talking about that though he's jesting about RTG stuff as I said it was better than it was before :emoticon-0105-wink: I wasn't joking as I said that as I'm probably commenting on what certain posters have said in the past which they don't really say now. The usual bedwetting stuff or blaming fans ****e from a few select other posters is still there as it will be on most SAFC forums worldwide :emoticon-0105-wink:

Anyway, moving on, I think the investment will happen eventually and we'll get a few decent players in come January. Hopefully someone who can bangs regular goals in as this is what we are missing, the G-Force of Gates and Gabbiadini as we've got G-**** in Grigg and Wyke!

If we do get the right players in then hopefully we'll get a decent run together. Until the investment is announced, it seems that after every result that there will be big reactions with the doom mongers attacking the happy clappers or vice versa depending on the result. When this happens, many like myself will be stuck in the crossfire so I'm just ignoring it all for now <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots
I appreciate this comment a lot mate. I tried PM'ing the fella this morning to try and understand what made him feel like all that was justified. I don't think I've been anything but civil, it's a forum, so I'm going to keep speaking my mind and those that disagree have every right to. They also have every right to ask me to show working out or question my beliefs about it. I'll answer in kind, but if someone calls me paranoid and autistic, they step over a line and that is not ok.

I'll leave it now.

I think I more than justified those comments in a detailed reply to your PM.

Why do you, yet again, want to bring this onto this thread?

Unless, of course, you have an agenda - paid or unpaid!
 
I was replying to someone who recognised that your abuse of me has gone beyond the pale. As did the mods when they removed your vindictive thread. I'm done with you now. No more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blond Bombshell
I asked, :

Can we please just agree on two points?

1) FPP accountants will be good/professional enough to uncover any financial shenanigans and these will be taken into account in any investment/takeover plans they may have.

2) Assuming that you agree with 1), you cease your campaign against SD/CM which, as many others have pointed out is both boring and serves no purpose?


His reply was:

You're not actually engaging with what I'm saying, just insisting that the only way forward is for me to not speak about this. Do you not see how unreasonable this is?

I mean you were wrong on the 5m vs 20m thing...


He's just a troll, no more no less with an agenda (paid for or not, it is obvious it exists)

Just how long will the mods allow him to post his bile?

I just don't understand his arrogance in believing he knows something they will miss and needing to CONSTANTLY restate it!!
 
Last edited:
I asked, :

Can we please just agree on two points?

1) FPP accountants will be good/professional enough to uncover any financial shenanigans and these will be taken into account in any investment/takeover plans they may have.

2) Assuming that you agree with 1), you cease your campaign against SD/CM which, as many others have pointed out is both boring and serves no purpose?


His reply was:

You're not actually engaging with what I'm saying, just insisting that the only way forward is for me to not speak about this. Do you not see how unreasonable this is?

I mean you were wrong on the 5m vs 20m thing...


He's just a troll, no more no less with an agenda (paid for or not, it is obvious it exists)

Just how long will the mods allow him to post his bile?
He may post bile in your (and many others) opinion but I'm not sure where he posted insulting comments or even actions such as starting a thread that weren't justified?

I don't see anyone else getting involved, apart from a few commenting on the ****e going on. I think it best for this thread that both of you let it go as it's a new takeover day that we can all speculate on or keep it in PMs if you want to continue :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
He may post bile in your (and many others) opinion but I'm not sure where he posted insulting comments or even actions such as starting a thread that weren't justified?

I don't see anyone else getting involved and I think it best for this thread that both of you let it go as it's a new takeover day or keep it in PMs :emoticon-0105-wink:

I've tried that route, by starting another thread, plus engaging with him on PM but his agenda is now crystal clear - he wishes to derail this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blond Bombshell
I've tried that route, by starting another thread, plus engaging with him on PM but his agenda is now crystal clear - he wishes to derail this thread.
I don't really want to get involve but I was just adding a neutral view of what it looks like. I've now asked the mods nip this in the bud anyway by reporting my own post as it's adding the square root of **** all to the thread content as I think both of you should just move on now or keep it in PMs.
 
I've tried that route, by starting another thread, plus engaging with him on PM but his agenda is now crystal clear - he wishes to derail this thread.
He only derails a thread if people reply to his post, I've read what he has to say in the past and I don't need to read it again so if I see he's made a comment I skim read it and if he's talking about SD and £20m I go to the next post. As long as you reply to his posts and it gets into a 'you say he says' type of cyclical argument you are as guilty as him of thread crapping.

Can both you and kitten agree to stop responding to each other as all you are doing is creating noise and it makes the thread a chore to read.

Ronnie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.