Saints Stuff

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
@Libby I think you asked about the club's finances the other day.

You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media
 
@Libby I think you asked about the club's finances the other day.

You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media

If you want to know what is what in the Club have a look at:-
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00053301/charges
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06951765/charges

Check out the Filling History, People etc. You may need help from someone who knows what they are talking about!
 
@Libby I think you asked about the club's finances the other day.

You must log in or register to see media

You must log in or register to see media

Yes asked about the loan last night which is a bit bizarre.

Good that we're looking to refinance it though the reports about SR paying a chunk off seem wide of the mark.
 
You must log in or register to see media

£200 million for Chelsea only.

Is there any chance what Joe Shields has done counts as industrial espionage of sorts?

Seems he came here, scouted our club and academy and immediately took that information to Chelsea.

We should cease any kind of relationship or negotiation with Chelsea, although I could see us losing Livramento as a result but that is probably inevitable anyway, wouldn’t be surprised if they trigger that buy back in January just to continue their trajectory of being as irritating as possible.
 
I can't us selling Lavia in Jan unless Chelsea put a really stupid offer in (i.e. over 100million).

Id expect it would have to be quite a bit more than the buy back price for City (£40m I think?)

Could sour the relationship with City if we sold him at basically the first opportunity, especially with Lavia they probably are planning on exercising the buy back and see this as more of a long term type loan agreement with us. If we sold him after 6 months to a rival I doubt they would he too welcoming with doing similar deals with us again in the future.

However if Chelsea banged down £60m+ for him then they may understand a bit more that we have to accept
 
Id expect it would have to be quite a bit more than the buy back price for City (£40m I think?)

Could sour the relationship with City if we sold him at basically the first opportunity, especially with Lavia they probably are planning on exercising the buy back and see this as more of a long term type loan agreement with us. If we sold him after 6 months to a rival I doubt they would he too welcoming with doing similar deals with us again in the future.

However if Chelsea banged down £60m+ for him then they may understand a bit more that we have to accept

Isn’t there a possibility that City could override a Chelsea bid and bring Lavia back in if they don’t want him to go?
 
Isn’t there a possibility that City could override a Chelsea bid and bring Lavia back in if they don’t want him to go?

Yes they could in theory match Chelsea bid, but I don’t think the buyback clause kicks in until the summer (maybe even summer 2024) so they can’t just buy him in Jan
 
Or just a swap for Gallagher and Broja. I couldn't see that happening though.

Nah I couldn't see mine either just thought I'd throw it out there. Can't see Chelsea offering enough in January either way but the summer will likely be different.